Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Close to Home — What it’s like on the street where you live
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
New Details Released In Brittany Killgore Investigation
There is pleny of evidence from just what I read-just from the cell phone use in Fallbrook. Thye are done, all of them.— July 18, 2012 8:55 p.m.
The So-Called Suicide Note
This comment was removed by the site staff.Traffic Cop Questioned in Encinitas
No, you are not clear on my position, if the "law" or anyone else wants to charge ANYONE with a criminal act, THEY need to prove it, the party making the charge needs to prove their case-and that is whether you are innocent or guilty, otherwise we would have Star Chambers again.....I thinnk if you google basice speed law and CA you will find teh answer, it is-I belive from memory- VC 22350, but dont quote me on that one.— July 18, 2012 12:18 p.m.
San Bernardino Council Votes for Bankruptcy
No, Scalia is very intelligent and he uses his superior intellect to push hid ideology, I thought he was going to be the one nominated for chief justice when Renquist died........ But the bottomm line is the law, the Constitution, is all a game of interpretation, there is eough room in the interpretation to make the law go anyway you want it to.....— July 17, 2012 8:58 p.m.
San Bernardino Council Votes for Bankruptcy
if the statement is true that they only have $150K in liquid cash, and that will not last 3 weeks, then BK is coming, because the fact is the pension costs are rising exponentially, no matter how much they save today-that pension scam is going thru the roof with every new day.........that will never be corrected without either a BK or a major renegotiation of contracts-including for current retirees IMO.— July 17, 2012 8:54 p.m.
Traffic Cop Questioned in Encinitas
Yes, it is rigth-even if you are guilty, because the duty of proof is on the one making the allegation, if they cannot prove it then they should not make the charge, regardless of the guilt or innocence. The fact is guilt or innocence is almost never black and white and many times falls in the gray area. A good example is the Basic Speed Law, which states you can drive at any speed that is safe for the conditions, regardless of the posted limit. Many times it is perfectly legit to drive faster than the posted limit but some cop with a RADAR or LASER gun wants to write 20 tickets at $500 a shot, and that is a good example of right and wrong being subjective. Another example is the cop or DA using two standards in charging -unequal application of law, that is another example of when it is right to win despite guilt.— July 17, 2012 8:42 p.m.
Traffic Cop Questioned in Encinitas
Is it RIGHT to beat the tickets just because you can? === Well, it is called due process of law and guaranteed to us under that pesky Constitution.........so yes, it is right, if the GED educated cop can't win a ticket in court they have no business writing it in the first place. As for " reporting" cops to their "supervisors", you have to be kidding me!!! Do you know how many complaints are upheld????????? I know one medium sized police agency that had not substantiated a SINGLE complaint ii over 7 full years, thousands of complaints filed yet not one was upheld....you are either a cop or related to one.— July 17, 2012 5:59 p.m.
Irwin Jacobs and Jerry Sanders: Billionaires and bullies create a false picture of public support for Plaza de Panama
Randy-you have a brass set buddy! Well said— July 17, 2012 1:23 a.m.
Traffic Cop Questioned in Encinitas
Actually a lessee has ALL the rights of the trust deed owner, once that lease is signed there is no legal difference between the lessee and the trust deed owner, except the trust deed owner no longer has the rights to the real property subject to the lease. Don't know who is advising you on your real estate law sfmc, but you are wrong-again, for the second time here..........and if the property is private all the owner or lessee has to do is say you're out of here and it is game over, property no longer open to the cop. Me thinks you need to go back to the academy and retake some law classes.— July 17, 2012 1:17 a.m.
Traffic Cop Questioned in Encinitas
Hate to break the news to you sfmc, but cops have to follow the rules/law too- like the rest of us-and they do not get to break the law of private property, or get an "exception" as you put it. In fact they should be held to a higher standard......that's reality.— July 17, 2012 1:12 a.m.