Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Close to Home — What it’s like on the street where you live
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
A pleasantly fun fish house
Someone should visit Chef John's Fish & Chips in Lemon Grove. Best fish and chips I have had anywhere. 1 piece of fish with a pile of fries $7.99 That's all I can eat. 2 pieces $11.49 and 3 is $14.49 Chef John is the owner and operator. Perfectly fried and not greasy.— February 26, 2017 8:57 a.m.
The fight for a wood-burning fireplace
First world problems.— February 23, 2017 3:14 p.m.
A pleasantly fun fish house
Do you mind sharing what was unfair and why it was so unfair it had to be removed?— February 22, 2017 11:53 a.m.
Fake Twitter account prompts lawsuit
She won't get jack shit. Defamation lawsuits only make money for the lawyer. There is still free speech, lampooning, and pranks. Before you can demand any damages for defamation you have to have character that has been defamed. LOL— February 21, 2017 11:41 p.m.
A pleasantly fun fish house
Visdah, I just found it. I've learned some work arounds. The Reader went to some effort to remove the story. They scrubbed both their server from the story but flushed the cache from Google's repository. Somebody wanted that story gone. This does not sit well with me. I consider myself a 'foodie' I love to cook and love the food scene. I used to subscribe to Food & Wine, Saveur, Gourmet, and others. Today I use Yelp and The Reader for reviews on food and restaurants. I read them all two Ian's and Candice. I did not find that restaurant review to be condemning enough to be removed. It was an honest and candid review. I blush at reviews that I read that are deliberately negative. But this review was not. If it were too negative to publish, why did it get past the editor? It may seem a big fuss to question the missing review. But to me it clearly begs what The Reader is up to. This little matter has a great impression on my opinion on the bias and credibility of The Reader. Are you going to be less critical on potential advertisers? Or what is the reason to remove a story and follow it up with a favorable one. I suppose this is a 'perk' for online publications because they can selectively 'erase' a story if, for some reason, it post-publishing became unpopular in 'the news room.' In the good old days of all print, a 'retraction' would be required. Today it is 'snip' In the present media environment, I am leery of every source. This is interesting.— February 21, 2017 9:53 p.m.
A pleasantly fun fish house
Click on the image to enlarge: http://www.sandiegoreader.com/users/photos/2017/f… "Lucy, you've got some 'splaining to do!"— February 21, 2017 8:27 p.m.
A pleasantly fun fish house
I hope The Reader isn't going low and doing the kind of crap that Yelp does. Pay-to-play. I remember reading that review as well and now it looked like it has been scrubbed. On another note, the same thing happened with a trendy, but horribly overpriced place called "Trust." A not so flattering review came out, then it was followed by Barbarella and another writer with more glowing accolades.— February 21, 2017 8:13 p.m.
Drop the shovel — more court for Plaza de Panama plan
What exactly is wrong with it now? The cars have been removed from the large area in front of the Museum of Art. Of course most of those parking spaces were for the disabled. Are people (I mean the rank and file, not the silicon peddling elite) petitioning for more parking? I know it gets crowded, but even on Earth Day I am able to find a spot to park. Parking is a big business. I'll take bets on the company that will get the parking concession (Ace). As soon as there is a fee for parking in the park, the zoo will begin charging for parking as well.(After 25 years I let my zoo membership go because the society is getting too cheap on the membership perks and commercializing the zoo too much). This parking garage is the camels nose under the tent because if it gets built, then the domino effect will be to charge for parking everywhere. We know the zoo wants to underground their parking and expand (the zoo on top of the parking structure), so this is just the beginning or making a visit to the park a costly one.— February 21, 2017 8:09 p.m.
Drop the shovel — more court for Plaza de Panama plan
Maybe emergency access?— February 21, 2017 5:06 p.m.
Dalai Lama causes a stir at UCSD
Dan, can you cite your source; "the total number of foreign student in the whole system is less than half of that in the UC system, only 3 or 4 percent."— February 20, 2017 8:46 p.m.