From eneformable.com comments
snip
We are now are being ruled by those in Nuclear Denial*; instead of by Leaders that demand an end to the Trillion Dollar Eco-Disaster RISK that Nuclear poses to mankind!
How would the UK pay for a Fukushima
or
Deal with a 50 mile NO GO ZONE ?
Remember Nature does not follow design basis calculations or even engineering RISK formulas…
The nuclear industry is fighting tooth and nail to maintain it’s market share; yet NOW Solar (of all flavors) is far less costly to construct, faster to construct and carries with it N☢ Nuclear radioactive baggage that can kill a Countries economy and or those living nearby!
Ask The Japanese!
*Nuclear Denial
http://is.gd/XPjMd0
The illogical belief that Nature cannot destroy any land based nuclear reactor, any place anytime 24/7/365!
— February 27, 2012 3:44 p.m.
The NRC gave the Nuclear Industry a "PASS" on the tube wear issue before on San Onofre and other reactors around the Country http://wp.me/p21p6a-77L
BUT NOW
They are realizing that they have a much bigger problem than they first "imagined"; metal erosion cannot be tolerated when the radioactive leakage is not only high in temperature but also high in amount of radiation!
Would you use a dangerous leaking pressure pot day after day,
... or would you be smart and replace it with something safer?
+
Why nuclear is on the way out:
1. Radiation is dangerous to man
2. Expensive to build compared to Competitive Power Sources.
3. Creates long lasting radioactive waste
4. Risky because Nature can destroy any land based nuclear reactor,
… Any place anytime 24/7/365!
5. No meaningful insurance for MAJOR radioactive damages to property or people! — February 27, 2012 12:04 p.m.
Haiku - A - Day
☯ First I was nervous Then I became committed Now in recovery— March 9, 2012 11:37 a.m.
Haiku - A - Day
☯ As the time go by Life seems to accelerate We all wonder why— March 7, 2012 5:47 p.m.
Safety Report Reveals More San Onofre Violations
From eneformable.com comments snip We are now are being ruled by those in Nuclear Denial*; instead of by Leaders that demand an end to the Trillion Dollar Eco-Disaster RISK that Nuclear poses to mankind! How would the UK pay for a Fukushima or Deal with a 50 mile NO GO ZONE ? Remember Nature does not follow design basis calculations or even engineering RISK formulas… The nuclear industry is fighting tooth and nail to maintain it’s market share; yet NOW Solar (of all flavors) is far less costly to construct, faster to construct and carries with it N☢ Nuclear radioactive baggage that can kill a Countries economy and or those living nearby! Ask The Japanese! *Nuclear Denial http://is.gd/XPjMd0 The illogical belief that Nature cannot destroy any land based nuclear reactor, any place anytime 24/7/365!— February 27, 2012 3:44 p.m.
Safety Report Reveals More San Onofre Violations
Join the Women of Fukushima on 311 at San Onofre http://decommission.sanonofre.com/ Join us for a day of PEACEFUL PROTEST at San Onofre, the nuclear power plant with the worst safety record of all 104 reactors in America. + How Do We Still Have Power When San Onofre is not Operating (19 days and counting)? http://decommission.sanonofre.com/2012/02/nuclear…— February 27, 2012 2:55 p.m.
Safety Report Reveals More San Onofre Violations
I agree with your comment 100%. Remember San Diego is within San Onofre's No Go Zone should it suffer a meltdown like Fukushima and even if they had a partial meltdown the radiation fallout would make property values drop to almost zero! Why take that RISK when we can get along just fine (we are doing it right now) without either of them since they have been "off line" for some time now!— February 27, 2012 2:46 p.m.
Safety Report Reveals More San Onofre Violations
More on this here: Latest Accident at San Onofre Nuclear Plant Worries Activists, Residents http://is.gd/QGfzxF— February 27, 2012 12:10 p.m.
Safety Report Reveals More San Onofre Violations
Please search the Reader site for additional stories on San Onofre and the peaceful protest on 3/11/12...— February 27, 2012 12:08 p.m.
Safety Report Reveals More San Onofre Violations
The NRC gave the Nuclear Industry a "PASS" on the tube wear issue before on San Onofre and other reactors around the Country http://wp.me/p21p6a-77L BUT NOW They are realizing that they have a much bigger problem than they first "imagined"; metal erosion cannot be tolerated when the radioactive leakage is not only high in temperature but also high in amount of radiation! Would you use a dangerous leaking pressure pot day after day, ... or would you be smart and replace it with something safer? + Why nuclear is on the way out: 1. Radiation is dangerous to man 2. Expensive to build compared to Competitive Power Sources. 3. Creates long lasting radioactive waste 4. Risky because Nature can destroy any land based nuclear reactor, … Any place anytime 24/7/365! 5. No meaningful insurance for MAJOR radioactive damages to property or people!— February 27, 2012 12:04 p.m.
UCAN Joins Fight Against Utility's Treatment of Customers
Sadly that is what I'm now thinking also! I think the correct word is "canard," as in meant to fail in order to promote yet more Nuclear which is a Trillion Dollar Eco-Disaster RISK for California!— February 26, 2012 6:35 p.m.
UCAN Joins Fight Against Utility's Treatment of Customers
Nice reply! Seen this chart: AREA Required for Solar http://is.gd/oYgd5d or this California's biggest energy utility announced a deal Monday to purchase 200 megawatts of electricity from a startup company that plans to beam the power down to Earth from outer space, beginning in 2016. http://is.gd/oYgd5d— February 26, 2012 4:20 p.m.