4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs

UCAN Joins Fight Against Utility's Treatment of Customers

Utility Consumers' Action Network, local utility watchdog, has filed a complaint with the California Public Utilities Commission against San Diego Gas & Electric's attempt to pass uninsured costs of the 2007 wildfires and future fires to ratepayers, instead of to shareholders.

Attorney Mike Aguirre and Ramona's Mussey Grade Alliance have been battling SDGE's planned customer-fleecing, which Aguirre has shown was almost certainly the result of a secret meeting between commissioners and the company.

This has been traced in Reader News Ticker items under my name on Jan. 17, 24, 26, 28, and Feb. 15, along with a column Feb. 15. Most recent filings by Aguirre and Mussey are appended to the Feb. 15 column.

"Aguirre has made strong points on the possibility of collusion," says David Peffer, the consumers' network attorney. "We're trying to stop this from happening." Already, "San Diego ratepayers pay the highest rates in the country," says Peffer. (See chart of stock performance of Sempra vs. other utilities on News Ticker and my column of Feb. 15.)

"This is absolutely unconscionable." SDG&E clams that increasing the safety of lines and buying more insurance "does not pass a cost-benefit analysis test," so the utility wants to pass the cost to ratepayers. "They say [picking up the costs] would damage their financial health." Shareholders? SDG&E was found negligent in the 2007 fires.

Yet shareholders get to escape, although the stock of Sempra, SDG&E's parent, soared 208% from 2000 to 2010, while the average utility stock edged up 8% over the period. Those aren't my numbers: they are Sempra's, from its 2010 annual report

Pictured: David Peffer

Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all

Previous article

Sergei Eisenstein: purveyor in Russian formalism

October: Ten Days that Shook the World and Alexander Nevsky
Next Article

Stuck on Russian ship in Ensenada, in Baja for the eclipse

Mexican cusswords, refugee on Coronados islands, Baja boom towns, woman pilots bring help, Orange Co. surfer adopted by farmers, Toyota crashes 300 miles south of San Diego, writer climbs 10K peak

Utility Consumers' Action Network, local utility watchdog, has filed a complaint with the California Public Utilities Commission against San Diego Gas & Electric's attempt to pass uninsured costs of the 2007 wildfires and future fires to ratepayers, instead of to shareholders.

Attorney Mike Aguirre and Ramona's Mussey Grade Alliance have been battling SDGE's planned customer-fleecing, which Aguirre has shown was almost certainly the result of a secret meeting between commissioners and the company.

This has been traced in Reader News Ticker items under my name on Jan. 17, 24, 26, 28, and Feb. 15, along with a column Feb. 15. Most recent filings by Aguirre and Mussey are appended to the Feb. 15 column.

"Aguirre has made strong points on the possibility of collusion," says David Peffer, the consumers' network attorney. "We're trying to stop this from happening." Already, "San Diego ratepayers pay the highest rates in the country," says Peffer. (See chart of stock performance of Sempra vs. other utilities on News Ticker and my column of Feb. 15.)

"This is absolutely unconscionable." SDG&E clams that increasing the safety of lines and buying more insurance "does not pass a cost-benefit analysis test," so the utility wants to pass the cost to ratepayers. "They say [picking up the costs] would damage their financial health." Shareholders? SDG&E was found negligent in the 2007 fires.

Yet shareholders get to escape, although the stock of Sempra, SDG&E's parent, soared 208% from 2000 to 2010, while the average utility stock edged up 8% over the period. Those aren't my numbers: they are Sempra's, from its 2010 annual report

Pictured: David Peffer

Sponsored
Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all
Comments
50

Great news for everyone that is not a shareholder in SDG&E! + How do we increase Solar usage nation wide in the shortest amount of time:

Or What Is Holding America Back?

http://www.grist.org/solar-power/2011-08-08-clever-accounting-lets-utilities-cash-in-when-you-go-solar

The Utilities want to maximize the profits for the shareholders and so they donate to Candidates to get them to support traditional Energy Production, which does not include anything but a token amount of Solar... We are being "forced" to accept their Energy "mix", instead of using our own and being fairly paid for the Energy we produce and push INTO the grid!!

When The Energy Utilities pay each of us for the energy we put into the grid, at the same rate that the Utility charges for that same energy someone else uses at that exact time, then you will see Solar being installed Nation wide!

Because Solar is generated during the daytime, it is the most valuable since the Utilities charge the most for daytime usage (where they have SMART metering)! Everyone pays an additional amount to support the infrastructure (The Grid) so that when the Energy Utilities begin to pay the same as what they charge (no pun intended), then it will make adding Solar panels a no brainer, since the payback period will be much shorter. Another benefit for all of us is that during a power outage, all the small solar panel producers can help to keep power flowing which will be a huge benefit during such times as hurricane, tornadoes and flooding!

Feb. 20, 2012

Sorry for the non working link, please try this one: http://is.gd/eQog1d

Feb. 20, 2012

Very interesting article, Founder. The utilities, colluding with their regulators, have found ways to pile up profits from solar. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 20, 2012

Add to the colluding all the connected people that support the Leaders that are supposed to appoint or elect and monitor those very same regulators...

In short it is a vicious cycle:

A. The well connected working to support "their" Candidates...

B. Candidates, now Leaders passing "helpful" policies ... (think political payback) those that elected them.

C. Those that want access to Leaders must "play their game"...

Feb. 20, 2012

You can add D. Court, particularly the Supreme Court, encouraging the crooked games to go on. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 20, 2012

Solar (on individual homes, not imported) is certainly the answer in San Diego County. There is lots of sun, sky-high utility rates, and an arrogant utility management that has alienated and outraged customers, and seems intent on escalating its bullying. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 20, 2012

How many reading this article are saying to themselves, Enough is Enough?

Why is it that SDG&E Shareholders can continue to make huge profits but rate payers are supposed to accept all "loses" by SDG&E?

What is wrong with that picture? Do you hear the "R-R-R-R-Rip Off" sound?

Our elected Leaders need to start putting the Public Good ahead of what is good for SDG&E shareholders of these BIG Donors that donate to these same Politicos that provide SDG&E Oversight! Until that happens, ALL rate holders will continue to get "Shorted" by SDG&E...

Please write Governor Brown and urge him to revamp the California Public Utilities Commission: (866) 849-8390, so we will not continue to get ripped off by our own Public Utility which is being "run" like the monopoly it is...

Feb. 20, 2012

Your thesis is correct, Founder. What SDGE is doing is a classic case of corporate socialism -- privatization of the gain and socialization of the risk. It is time for utility shareholders to carry the burden of mismanagement at the top of companies whose stock the buy. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 20, 2012

Yes, I agree and we can see signs of very same thing at City Hall and even the State and Federal level and in every major Project paid for with City, State or Federal money!

The Political "fix" is in and until there are MAJOR changes in the way our Leaders are chosen and how they collect donations, we will see much more of the same thing, especially since the SCOTUS changed one man one vote to one dollar one vote!

Feb. 20, 2012

True, but it's really one hundred thousand dollars, one vote. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 20, 2012

Founder, there were many people saying "enough is enough" in the late 70's and early 80's. Yet, what came of it? Not much at all. We have been overpaying for electricity to SDGE for decades, and without some drastic action that will not change. No matter who has been our state governor, the CPUC has had a consistent pro-utility bias. Don't forget that the green folks have encouraged economic disincentives for those who are heavy energy users. Have a swimming pool? "Green" doesn't like you. Use a lot of A/C? Same thing. There is an unholy alliance between those who would see us consume less energy and the money-hungry utility companies who want to soak us all.

Solar should be one big answer to this alliance. Who cannot love solar? If you are SDGE, you should welcome it as a way to reduce strain on the power grid and help you out when the load is the highest, i.e. summer afternoons. If you don't like the idea of burning oil, coal, or natural gas to make electricity just so you can sit comfortably in your sealed-up office on a hot day, solar is the answer. Then, why is SDGE trying to make investment in rooftop solar panels a loser? That is the question, and it has to do with power--not electrical power--to pick your pocket going and coming for electrical power.

Follow the money and the influence.

Feb. 20, 2012

I can't argue with a thing you say, Visduh. SDGE has been scamming us for decades. Sempra is devoted to running up its stock and granting very hefty pay and retirement benefits to its top brass. Period. It has never cared much about customers. When two regulatory bodies said SDGE negligence was a major factor in the 2007 fires, the company at first refused to give information to investigators, then fought the findings. It could have spent the money doing something about its faulty lines and practices. It is high time this arrogant company heard from the San Diego public. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 20, 2012

"Public" utilities, my a$$. Power companies. Honk, honk!

Feb. 21, 2012

You are right, Twister. "Public utilities" has become a euphemism, and nowhere is this more true than in San Diego. Ditto for California PUBLIC Utilities Commission. If only the commission gave a damn about the public. The public has just become a vehicle for boosting the common stocks of utilities. Soak the public, satisfy Wall Street is the shibboleth today. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 21, 2012

Extend the trend . . .

Feb. 21, 2012

Extending the trend is the mission of SDGE in collusion with CPUC. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 21, 2012

It is starting to look like we are being told that out utility really supports going green , yet in reality they are doing it in such a manner that is really just tokenism, while the Utility just further cements it's strangle hold on all it's rate payers while demanding ever more money for energy!

In reality they should change their name to $DG&E...

Feb. 23, 2012

Wall Street appears to think SDGE will get away with forcing customers to pick up uninsured fire costs from 2007 and into the future. Sempra stock was $55.42 on Jan. 13, when the three-day hearings ended in San Francisco. The stock has moved up since then to $57.70, although the overall market was up during that period and it's down almost 1% today. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 23, 2012

KUDOS It is a joy to be able to actually leave comments, ... and read your replies!

Sempra is out for $EMPRA and until everyone in CA understands that and demands Political change ... We are all doomed to ever more rate increases...

Now even our Water is being "sold" as a vanishing ... resource, which bye the way is also going up in cost!

Feb. 23, 2012

At the same time SDGE is seeking to foist the cost of its negligence on its customers instead of on its shareholders, the company is also seeking a general rate case increase. San Diegans MUST turn out for those meetings in April. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 23, 2012

Is UCAN a fifth column outfit? What about Shames?

Feb. 23, 2012

Check my recent columns and blog posts on Shames by going to the Reader search box. UCAN's internal situation is quite interesting. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 26, 2012

I searched: Bauder Shames. I got this:

Message: A server error has occurred. Description: Check server response code in details. Details: 500

I don' know nuthin' 'bout code . . .

Feb. 26, 2012

Try bauder + shames. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 26, 2012

There is now a petition based upon this article:

STOP RIPPING OFF SOLAR ENERGY !

http://signon.org/sign/stop-ripping-off-solar?source=c.url&r_by=2743636

Feb. 26, 2012

San Diego is ideally suited for solar energy use. But SDGE is determined to frustrate customers who would like to use it. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 26, 2012

I wouldn't say that SD is ideally suited. According to NOAA data, SD receives only about 68% of available sunlight, based on about 60 yrs of data. That's about average for most of most of southern cal and is in the range of most of the southern US, excluding the desert southwest. The areas best suited run across the deserts from Cal thru Az and NM and into Texas. The central valley is also well suited, getting about 10% more sunshine than SD. Not surprising, considering the amount of agro there. According to the NOAA date, the best place in the country foor solar, in terms of amount of sunlight, is the Yuma area with about 90%.

Feb. 26, 2012

Nice reply! Seen this chart: AREA Required for Solar http://is.gd/oYgd5d

or this California's biggest energy utility announced a deal Monday to purchase 200 megawatts of electricity from a startup company that plans to beam the power down to Earth from outer space, beginning in 2016. http://is.gd/oYgd5d

Feb. 26, 2012

Yeah, I'm familiar with SCE. You should try downloading their field guide for renewable energy technologies. It makes good bedtime reading. As for the PG&E deal, well let's just say I'm in the camp that considers the agreement a public-relations maneuver to show that the utility is attempting to meet its mandate to use renewable energy. Solaren never raised the money, $1billion. They said they were going to be launching their first satellites in 2011 and 2012. As far as I am aware, there have been no launches, and in fact no contracts awarded to build. Color me a non believer in Solaren's claims.

Feb. 26, 2012

Sadly that is what I'm now thinking also!

I think the correct word is "canard," as in meant to fail in order to promote yet more Nuclear which is a Trillion Dollar Eco-Disaster RISK for California!

Feb. 26, 2012

If it looks like a canard, walks like a canard, and quackeries like a canard, it just might be an ()gly #()ck!ng [email protected]!!ng!

Feb. 26, 2012

Twister, you mean that if it looks, walks and quacks like a canard, it is probably not a canary? Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 26, 2012

Up on the bar, Don, and give us a song!

Feb. 26, 2012

I know lawyers who never passed the bar and I know some who never passed a bar. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 27, 2012

Maybe a P-crock?

Feb. 26, 2012

Strutting like a P-crock? Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 27, 2012

I don't know about it being meant to fail. It was a no lose proposition for PG&E, which is why I think it was done for the PR. And I highly doubt it was done in order to promote more nuclear energy. Section 25524.1(b) of the California Public Resources Code prohibits the building of any nuclear fission thermal powerplant requiring the reprocessing of fuel rods until (paraphrasing)the CEC finds the federal gov't has approved a demonstrated technology or means for the permanent and terminal disposal of high-level nuclear wastes. Put simply, until the feds have a way of disposing nuclear waste, no new plants in Ca. The ban could be repealed by the Legislature, or through a ballot initiative,neither of which is likely any time soon. Every attempt in the Legislature has been killed and nothing has been close to getting on the ballot for a vote. I doubt any of the utilities would waste the time effort and money to even bother, especially considering the opposition they're getting just to relicense the existing reactors. Nope, no more nukes in Ca anytime soon, at least probably not in my lifetime.

Feb. 26, 2012

You are correct: there has to be a way to dispose of nuclear waste. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 27, 2012

Last I heard, which was more than a year ago, PGE and SCE were ahead of SDGE in adapting renewable energy. But that may have changed. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 26, 2012

The goal was 20% by 2010. SCE had a little over 19%, and PG&E had almost 18% but SDGE is lagging big time, less than 12%. That said California by far has the most grid connected PV capacity, almost 1/2 of the US total.

Feb. 26, 2012

How does San Diego compare to Germany? Are they stoopid?

Feb. 26, 2012

I'm sure San Diego is more suited to solar than gray Germany. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 26, 2012

Obviously, the climate in SD is more suited for solar PV use than is Germany. However, you might be interested to know that according to the EPIA, in 2011 Germany had the largest installed PV capacity in the EU, about 24.7K mw. That is around 70% of the entire amount of solar pv in the EU and it also represents about 20% of Germany's power usage. And I believe the overall cost of electricity has been reduced as well, even to non PV customers. It seems that Germany has less to work with, yet they still do a better job. What was it Tom Devoe said, "if you want things done, put a German on it."

Feb. 27, 2012

Sounds like San Diego is well suited for solar, not necessarily ideally suited. I would think parts of the back country and places such as Borrego Springs may be ideally suited. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 26, 2012

Ideally suited? Virgin back country versus, oh say, the miles and miles of existing commercial rooftops here in the city? Directly on top of the San Andreas Fault?Really? I'm a gonna beg to differ with you on that one, DB.

SDG&E's a Sempra subsidiary,one of the country's corporate mega-monster who just happens to be in business with Petróleos Mexicanos--so much for relieving ourselves of foreign fuel dependency. Ethically, I've got some issue with some of their choices.

I've lonnnng been in favor of solar energy. With most of the patents held by the oil mongols, don't know how we ever expect it to be affordable--truly. Here's a question though:IF we could generate electricity AND fuel from solid waste which was not contingent upon the weather--at its source-- for a fraction of the cost of other renewables and with significantly less carbon footprint--would we, the public, fabricate some resistance to that technology or would we scramble to buy up shares? Just asking.

Feb. 26, 2012

Those who plunk money into startups and also rush into IPOs are unlikely to care about anything except their expected return on investment. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 27, 2012

Mr. Bauder, as I recall, don't you have a good portion of your retirement funds invested in stocks, something around 40%? And didn't you recently say you were going to be buying more , I think you said because of the way the Fed is pumping things up? Surely you can't expect us to believe that with that much of your retirement in the market, with more to come, that you don't expect a good return on your investment. In fact, haven't you said something to the effect that you ONLY invest in stocks that have a good return?

Feb. 27, 2012

I have 31% of my financial assets in stocks, almost all the rest in bonds and almost nothing in cash. Reason: the Federal Reserve, in keeping short rates near zero and driving long rates to record lows, is trying to run up the stock market, although it insists it is trying to help the economy. The only way you can get income is through common stocks that yield 3.5% to even 8% or so. This means that about 80% of that 31% is in utilities, but I also have some blue chip pharmaceuticals, oils, and consumer staples that were yielding generally at least 4% when I bought them. The Fed's strategy is copied by other central banks around the world. The U.S. suffered the worst economic decline and weakest recovery therefrom since the Great Depression. Yet stocks have doubled since 2009. Why? The main reason is the liquidity created by central banks, particularly the Fed. This will end unpleasantly some day -- as in 2008 -- but I can't predict when. The stock market is more closely related to liquidity than it is to the economy. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 28, 2012

I didn't detect a direct answer in there, but if I can decipher what you said, then it appears the answer to the question is yes, you buy stocks based on an expectation of a good roi. So given that, what else is it that you consider, what other factor would stop you from buying something that has a good return and is within your budgetary/risk constraints? By way of disclosure, let me say this. We have been invested in the market for quite awhile, about 35 yrs, give or take. I would say the 2 things we have always looked at are what kind of return are we going to get and the longevity of the investment. We have always tried to invest in stocks that would give us good returns over a long period of time. I'm just uncertain as to what other considerations you think would override those things. Maybe it's just my market naivety, but anything else would seem to be counterintuitive.

Feb. 28, 2012

One constraint, only relevant to me, is that I won't invest in anything based in San Diego -- stock, bond, whatever. This is obvious: for ethical reasons, I can't invest in an asset whose price I might be able to affect. Generally, as I said, I invest in blue chip stocks yielding at least 4%, sometimes slightly less. Occasionally I speculate in a high-yielding stock or bond, but not very often. You said I like roi. Of course. Everybody does. But if you get a good dividend and have reason to believe it will not be suspended, you are part of the way there. That's why I like dividend-paying stocks. We don't spend those returns (we may have to some day) but I think that over a long period of time, one is better off buying blue chip stocks with good dividends. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 28, 2012

Sign in to comment

Sign in

Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed Big Screen — Movie commentary Blurt — Music's inside track Booze News — San Diego spirits Classical Music — Immortal beauty Classifieds — Free and easy Cover Stories — Front-page features Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts Feast! — Food & drink reviews Feature Stories — Local news & stories Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore From the Archives — Spotlight on the past Golden Dreams — Talk of the town Letters — Our inbox [email protected] — Local movie buffs share favorites Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news News Ticker — News & politics Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated Poetry — The old and the new Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers Reading — The hunt for intellectuals Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds SD on the QT — Almost factual news Sheep and Goats — Places of worship Special Issues — The best of Street Style — San Diego streets have style Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads Your Week — Daily event picks
4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs
Close