Contentious May 9 meeting of Oceanside City Council
  • Contentious May 9 meeting of Oceanside City Council
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

In the last six years, the Oceanside city clerk says he can only remember one other time when anyone blurted out “recall” from a city council meeting audience.

“It was when the council approved district elections,” says Zack Beck. “But it was only one person.”

That wasn’t the case at Wednesday’s (May 9) council meeting. A chorus of unhappy locals rudely and loudly blurted out the r-word to the newly appointed mayor, and two other councilmen who ignored 25 locals imploring the council to reject a 99-room hotel that was approved to be built on a slope west of I-5 on Oceanside Boulevard.

The fact that every single resident who spoke said they do not want the five-story Fairfield Inn and Suites at Oceanside Boulevard and its massive concrete retaining wall in their neighborhood was ignored by Mayor Peter Weiss and councilmen Jerry Kern and Jack Feller.

“It looks like a hospital on the hill,” says Michael Witboard who works at Tri-City Hospital. “I bought west of I-5 for a reason. Let’s not sell ourselves short for a two-star hotel.” Witboard says he has noticed soil movement on his property that overlooks the proposed development and suggests the upcoming grading will only cause his property value to endure a further downhill slide.

Other speakers called the development “trash,” “a cement fortress,” and “an eyesore on the hill.” Some said a newly planned U-turn in front of a 7-11 to accommodate the development welcomes more auto accidents.

Ex-Marine Sean Heskew says he bought his seaside home to accommodate his four children but that the new hotel would drastically downgrade his homesite. “I don’t want my children to live in a neighborhood like that.”

The Fairfield Inn project had already been denied by the Oceanside planning commission on a 6-1 vote in January.

“I know we need to bring in more TOT [hotel-delivered transit occupancy tax], but this is the wrong project in the wrong location,” according to planning commissioner Kyle Krahel, who says the hotel might be fine somewhere else. “We need a planned-out gateway. Throwing a hotel there arbitraliry is not good planning.”

“The main objection I had, was this was incompatible with the adjoining neighborhood,” says Dennis Martinek, who rejected the hotel complex as a voting planning commissioner. “There is a safety issue with too many cars entering onto Oceanside Boulevard, which already has too much traffic.” Martinek says he can’t fathom why the council ignored the unanimous resident outcry.

“There does seem to be a cozy relationship with certain council members and developers,” says Martinek. “This is typical of the Oceanside city council.”

Councilmen Feller and Kern both said at the May 9 meeting that they look forward to the TOT revenue that is projected to come in from the hotel.

Although Weiss said he initially had reservations about “The need for the excessive retaining walls and the overall size of the project,” he said he’s decided the project is now “overall beneficial.”

When asked about the complaint stated by some residents that Weiss seems like a shill for the BIA (Building Industry Association), Weiss responded “Not exactly sure what you mean by that, as the BIA generally deals with residential builders.”

The only speaker who said the Fairfield Inn and Suites at Oceanside Boulevard was a good idea was Scott Ashton, who was speaking as the CEO for the Oceanside Chamber of Commerce.

But even real estate professionals decried the development at the May 9 meeting including real estate broker Robyn Goodkind (a planning commissioner) and attorney Michael Grehl who lives near the development and has been a real estate developer and broker since 2003. Grehl broached the idea that OCNA (Oceanside Coastal Neighborhood Association) may file a lawsuit to halt the project.

“There has been some discussion within the OCNA as to whether a lawsuit should be filed,” says Grehl. He adds there is a 30-day window to file such a suit. “The discussion is ongoing.”

Meanwhile, Oceanside’s civic freak flag was flying high at the May 9 council meeting when apparent infighting between council members Chuck Lowery and Esther Sanchez caused a head scratching moment.

Lowery grew up and now lives in the historic Plumosa Heights neighborhood, which is most impacted by the planned hotel. After an impassioned speech about how the project cheapened and degraded his neighborhood, Lowery made a motion to reject the rezoning changes, accept the planning commission recommendation, and stop the hotel.

No one seconded the motion although it was clear Sanchez was against the project. Members of the audience yelled out “Second it, Esther,” but she ignored them and sat silent. An eventual vote had Sanchez and Lowery voting against it, but some wondered if Sanchez was playing politics, since she and Lowery both live in District 1, and she and Lowery will be running for the same seat in November. Did Sanchez not want the record to show that she would second one of Lowery’s motions?

Sanchez was asked via email about her failure to second. She did not respond.

“I’ve been involved in developments for 15-plus years and I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a city council behave in that matter,” says Grehl.

  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it


Visduh May 11, 2018 @ 5:23 p.m.

Mr. Witboard refers to Fairfield as a "two star" hotel. Actually it is the "economy" brand of the Marriott Corporation, and strives to be something nicer than that. BUT, I've had experiences with Fairfield operations that fell far short of anything to be proud of. And, after the last one I just swore off Fairfield completely. Hilton's "economy" operations, Hampton Inns, are far better.

So, what they build there will likely deteriorate rapidly, and could be a typical "Patel motel" within twenty years. That spot doesn't need a standard chain motel like just any other Interstate highway interchange. Oceanside keeps trying to boost its image, but this doesn't do anything like that.


AlexClarke May 12, 2018 @ 7:09 a.m.

Sounds like the city council has the vision of an Ostrich. Some are just trying to put lipstick on a pig it is Oceanside after all.


Ken Leighton May 12, 2018 @ 12:46 p.m.

Although its council members sometime show a lack of public decorum and behave with a hog wild, anything-goes abandon, the city itself is not a pig. Although if you ask any of the 25 neighbors who spoke on Wednesday, they would tell you oside has become hog heaven for developers who are cheerfully turning it into Temecula South....Pig sty by the sea.


Visduh May 12, 2018 @ 6:33 p.m.

Geez, Ken. Why don't you tell us how you REALLY feel? I've posted harsh comments about my neighboring city, but you've gone over the top. And Jerry Kern wants to replace "Bulldozer Bill" Horn as the No County supervisor? Good luck Jer, and good luck to anyone who votes for him. There have to be better choices than he.


GetofmyLawn May 12, 2018 @ 7:12 p.m.

Oceanside can be the city of NIMBYs but one thing remains fact, the city council of Oceanside does not care about residents or their home values.

I has been said many, many times, if it is a cement project it is APPROVED. Never mind what the residents want, or think they want. What they need is more parking garages, more condos and less poor people. Heck we need more micro breweries how can we fast track that?

They, the 'conservative' city council, wants to raise the sales tax here. They say they need more money for the police, fire and streets. Lets have a conversation about how and where the city council has squandered funds. Some officials double dipping or getting a golden parachute upon swift departure out of city hall.

Goat Hill golf course, Oceanside airport, and the list continues. These venues provide little to no income for the city but cost the city a great deal of money. Who benefits? The residents? TOT - what hogwash.

Ken I would like to know if you contacted the hotel group about the planned 'budget class' project they are about to construct? Careful now, you don't want anyone from the chamber calling your phone about writing a slanted story. . .


Ken Leighton May 12, 2018 @ 11:26 p.m.

As I said, Oceanside itself is not a lipsticked pig as two originals commenters said. The disgust I was referring to was what was projected by 100% of the 25 neighbors who commented about how this project will degrade their neighborhood and cheapen the city. Please watch the replay of the meeting on the city's or KOCT's website and you will see what I was talking about and what I trying to reflect in the article. Why did not one neighbor say they wanted this?


Ken Leighton May 13, 2018 @ 10:41 a.m.

A few months ago, Tom Shepard, who may be the single most dialed in San Diego politico, said on TV (paraphrasing) that he could not think of a more dysfunctional san Diego county political entity than the oside city council. Before you anonymous bloggers get your panties too twisted, please note that I objected to the lipsticked pig comparison to the CITY of Oceanside. But its city council's ongoing combative demeanor and its current coincil's rush to make it like Temecula is where the pig slur may be on point.


Sign in to comment

Let’s Be Friends

Subscribe for local event alerts, concerts tickets, promotions and more from the San Diego Reader