Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
The good old days that never were
The case for Howard the Duck and “Kyrie” is with the jury
There were plenty of good movies in the ’80s, but what about Howard the Duck?
Dear Hipster: I have been thinking about the popularity of retro stuff recently, at least from a pop-culture standpoint. To me, it seems like people remember the past as distinctly better than it actually was. For example, everybody — especially hipsters — likes to talk about how great ’80s music was. But for those of us who actually lived through the ’80s, well, let me tell you, a lot of the tunes on the radio back then were utterly forgettable. Really! It was pretty much the same as it is now. If you’re not convinced by that, look at how much more likely people were to die of various injuries and diseases only a few decades ago. Or, if that’s not convincing enough, consider movies. Sure, there were plenty of good movies in the ’80s (Blade Runner, amiright?), but what about Howard the Duck? If, as I suspect, nostalgia sanitizes the past, I think it becomes really hard — perhaps impossible — to be into retro, hipster-y stuff. But, then again, what if I’m wrong? What if retro stuff actually is cool because it pays homage to great moments in the past, heretofore unequaled? I guess the matter comes down to this: do you think the world really was legitimately better “then” (whenever that was), or do we now live in a better, more enlightened world? — Danae
Now, I’m not usually in the position of making value judgments about people’s preferences for arts and entertainment, so... oh, wait, hold on. Scratch that. I totally make value judgments all the time, with reckless impunity and wanton disregard for the feelings of others. It’s kind of my thing, ergo:
You’re totally right, after a fashion.
Only 32 years ago, “Kyrie” by Mr. Mister, topped the Billboard Hot 100 over better songs by better bands. Yup. You read that right, a synth-pop ode riffing on a Greek prayer outperformed “Manic Monday” and “West End Girls.” But we remember 1986 for “Papa Don’t Preach” and “Sledgehammer” dropping as singles, not “Kyrie” dominating the airwaves. There are two ways you can unpack that fact. Either (a) we selectively cherry-pick the best of the past and discard the rest to the trash-heap of history; or (b) what looks like nostalgia is just the end result of the historical process, by which the cream rises to the top.
The first option appeals to the curmudgeonly old bastard in all of us, just sitting there on the metaphorical front porch, waiting to regale the neighborhood kids with stories of “back in my day” that none of them want to hear.
The second option speaks to the hipster within, the pop-culture cognoscente who take it upon themselves to separate all the world into two piles, one cool, the other not. Knowing the difference is the whole battle.
Both of these things contain at least some truth...perhaps together they frame up a whole truth, or something close to it. In the end, it’s just difference, devoid of any value judgment outside that which we impose on it in hindsight. What you see in the past is just a reflection of how you think about the present, and maybe what you speculate for the future. So, in another sense, I guess you’ve got it backward. Play around with that a little and get back to me, unless history swoops in to render us all irrelevant.
Here's something you might be interested in.
The good old days that never were
The case for Howard the Duck and “Kyrie” is with the jury
The good old days that never were
The case for Howard the Duck and “Kyrie” is with the jury
There were plenty of good movies in the ’80s, but what about Howard the Duck?
Dear Hipster: I have been thinking about the popularity of retro stuff recently, at least from a pop-culture standpoint. To me, it seems like people remember the past as distinctly better than it actually was. For example, everybody — especially hipsters — likes to talk about how great ’80s music was. But for those of us who actually lived through the ’80s, well, let me tell you, a lot of the tunes on the radio back then were utterly forgettable. Really! It was pretty much the same as it is now. If you’re not convinced by that, look at how much more likely people were to die of various injuries and diseases only a few decades ago. Or, if that’s not convincing enough, consider movies. Sure, there were plenty of good movies in the ’80s (Blade Runner, amiright?), but what about Howard the Duck? If, as I suspect, nostalgia sanitizes the past, I think it becomes really hard — perhaps impossible — to be into retro, hipster-y stuff. But, then again, what if I’m wrong? What if retro stuff actually is cool because it pays homage to great moments in the past, heretofore unequaled? I guess the matter comes down to this: do you think the world really was legitimately better “then” (whenever that was), or do we now live in a better, more enlightened world? — Danae
Now, I’m not usually in the position of making value judgments about people’s preferences for arts and entertainment, so... oh, wait, hold on. Scratch that. I totally make value judgments all the time, with reckless impunity and wanton disregard for the feelings of others. It’s kind of my thing, ergo:
You’re totally right, after a fashion.
Only 32 years ago, “Kyrie” by Mr. Mister, topped the Billboard Hot 100 over better songs by better bands. Yup. You read that right, a synth-pop ode riffing on a Greek prayer outperformed “Manic Monday” and “West End Girls.” But we remember 1986 for “Papa Don’t Preach” and “Sledgehammer” dropping as singles, not “Kyrie” dominating the airwaves. There are two ways you can unpack that fact. Either (a) we selectively cherry-pick the best of the past and discard the rest to the trash-heap of history; or (b) what looks like nostalgia is just the end result of the historical process, by which the cream rises to the top.
The first option appeals to the curmudgeonly old bastard in all of us, just sitting there on the metaphorical front porch, waiting to regale the neighborhood kids with stories of “back in my day” that none of them want to hear.
The second option speaks to the hipster within, the pop-culture cognoscente who take it upon themselves to separate all the world into two piles, one cool, the other not. Knowing the difference is the whole battle.
Both of these things contain at least some truth...perhaps together they frame up a whole truth, or something close to it. In the end, it’s just difference, devoid of any value judgment outside that which we impose on it in hindsight. What you see in the past is just a reflection of how you think about the present, and maybe what you speculate for the future. So, in another sense, I guess you’ve got it backward. Play around with that a little and get back to me, unless history swoops in to render us all irrelevant.
Comments