The radioactive material would be 108 feet from the ocean now, but rising oceans will put it under water eventually.
  • The radioactive material would be 108 feet from the ocean now, but rising oceans will put it under water eventually.
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

A terrorist attack that could endanger 8.5 million people. Who cares? A tsunami or earthquake that could spread even wider damage. Yawn. A potentially disastrous meltdown. Fuhgeddaboudit. A utility stock that zooms upward, paying fat dividends. Bingo! Finally, you are talking about something important.

Workers construct canisters to receive radioactive waste at San Onofre. The waste will be radioactive for the next 250,000 years. The canisters are warrantied for 10-25 years.

Workers construct canisters to receive radioactive waste at San Onofre. The waste will be radioactive for the next 250,000 years. The canisters are warrantied for 10-25 years.

Wall Street has that view: the only thing important about utilities is whether their stocks and dividends go up. That is understandable. But, pathetically, that view is also shared by the California and federal agencies that are supposed to regulate utilities in the public interest. Tragically, regulators seem to be as fixated on rising utility profits as Wall Street is. Officially, regulators’ mission is to protect the public.

Charles Langley of Public Watchdogs: “Some type of accident at the waste dump is inevitable, unavoidable.”

Charles Langley of Public Watchdogs: “Some type of accident at the waste dump is inevitable, unavoidable.”

For the past decade, I have watched as the California Public Utilities Commission, as well as other regulators, put the financial health of utilities ahead of the financial and physical health of citizens. During that period, I have also watched financial reports on the state’s three investor-owned utilities — Sempra Energy, Edison International, and Pacific Gas & Electric — emanating from Wall Street. I can’t remember seeing discussions of those utilities’ well-publicized attempts (usually successful) to fleece or endanger the population: Edison’s shifting most costs of the San Onofre fiasco to ratepayers, Pacific Gas & Electric’s negligence leading to the San Bruno explosion, Sempra’s mismanagement worsening the disastrous 2007 fires, Sempra’s carelessness leading to a major gas leak at Aliso Canyon, and, potentially most disastrous, Edison’s plan to bury 3.6 million pounds of deadly nuclear waste 108 feet from the water at San Onofre State Beach Park.

Wall Street generally pays no attention to such calamities because it knows that regulators will give the utilities a gentle and Machiavellian wrist slap — say, making a big deal of slapping a fine on the utility, then granting the company a fatter-than-expected rate of return that will cover the so-called fine — and then some.

“We consider California a constructive regulatory environment,” enthused investment research firm Morningstar in its May 2 report on Sempra. In the first two pages alone, there were five references to accommodative state regulation. On the next day, Morningstar had five laudations in the first two pages for Edison’s regulatory environment. In neither report was there one mention of both companies’ possibly expensive problems.

Southern California Edison, part of Edison International, owns almost 80 percent of San Onofre. San Diego Gas & Electric, a unit of Sempra Energy, owns 20 percent.

On May 17, a group called Public Watchdogs came out with a 450-page study of Edison’s frightening plan to bury nuclear waste near the water at North County’s now-shuttered San Onofre nuclear plant. A disaster there could release 40 times the radiation unleashed at the Chernobyl disaster in the Ukraine in 1986. According to Public Watchdogs, the San Onofre plutonium waste could be deadly for 250,000 years but will be stored in thin-walled canisters warrantied for only 10 to 25 years.

The study, called “Radiological Regulatory Failure,” pins much of the blame on the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Federal Emergency Management Agency (called FEMA). The report points out that, thanks to federal laxity, Edison doesn’t have to do emergency planning outside of the San Onofre perimeter; doesn’t have to do terrorist preparedness with local police; is not required to notify the public within 15 minutes of a radiation release; and has no requirement to sound an air-raid siren in a nuclear emergency. Only three people will patrol the nation’s largest privately owned radioactive nuclear waste dump. And get this: under consideration is “reduced requirements for Drug and Alcohol Testing” for those three people guarding the facility that has millions of pounds of nuclear waste buried near the ocean. Three stoned monitors would be almost an invitation to terrorists.

“Contrary to the assertions by Public Watchdogs, the…San Onofre dry cask storage facilities are built to withstand tsunamis and earthquakes,” insists Edison. But, rejoins Charles Langley of Public Watchdogs, “Some type of accident at the waste dump is inevitable, unavoidable,” especially as global warming puts the canisters and their deadly content under water. The project is “mind-bogglingly insane.”

Late last year, San Diego attorneys Maria Severson and Mike Aguirre filed suit against the California Coastal Commission, which has approved the volcanic burial-by-the-beach. (Edison was named as a real party in interest.) As the suit tells in detail, and Aguirre explains in an interview, “Edison placed irreconcilable demands on the steam generators; they wanted them to last longer and produce the same amount of power. They limited the design to avoid regulatory scrutiny.” Those are just the kinds of shortcuts Wall Street loves. Generator equipment built to last 40 years sprung a radioactive leak in less than a year, and ultimately, Edison closed down the entire San Onofre operation. Then Edison had a secret meeting with Michael Peevey, at the time head of the California Public Utilities Commission and formerly Edison’s president. This was highly illegal, but thanks in great part to gubernatorial duplicity, the utility and the purported regulator got away with a plan to screw ratepayers and fatten Edison.

Result: ratepayers got stuck with $3.3 billion of the $5 billion tab for decommissioning San Onofre, though ratepayers had absolutely nothing to do with the calamity. It was all management stupidity and greed. Thus, shareholders should have paid the entire $5 billion.

Aguirre’s objective is to see the San Onofre nuclear waste moved. Aguirre and Severson believe that storage locations for the waste can be found — probably in Arizona or New Mexico — and transportation won’t be a problem.

In April, Edison agreed to launch negotiations with Aguirre and Severson on whether the radioactive material should be moved.

However, “Edison has not backed off on construction” of the project, says Langley. “They are going great guns to complete it.” Edison’s scheduled talks with Aguirre and Severson “seem to me a big stall by Edison.” Aguirre disagrees.

These negotiations could be interesting. In their filing last November against the coastal commission, Aguirre and Severson made this statement: “Edison has made a series of false statements to California State officials at the [California Public Utilities Commission] and to the public that demonstrate that it is unreasonable to rely on Edison’s statements regarding San Onofre.”

Wall Street has listened to Edison’s lies. Is it invited?

Happy negotiations.

  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it


shirleyberan June 14, 2017 @ 2:34 p.m.

What weighs more, 3 pounds of profit for SoCalEdison and SDGE or thousands of irradiated souls young and old, or normal judgement plus a few critical thinkers with 3 lbs of adult human brain each?


swell June 14, 2017 @ 7:20 p.m.

3 Cheers for Aguirre and Severson. I hope everyone is listening to Mike on KNSJ radio every day. He's fun, perceptive and has a vast understanding of law, history and justice.


Don Bauder June 15, 2017 @ 11:47 a.m.

shirleyberan: That is the point of this column. Best, Don Bauder


Don Bauder June 15, 2017 @ 11:48 a.m.

swell: Aguirre, Severson, Langley, and Lutz are doing an excellent job fighting the stranglehold that the CPUC and the utilities have on ratepayers. Best, Don Bauder


Don Bauder June 15, 2017 @ 11:49 a.m.

Clive Peters. Please. Come now. Best, Don Bauder


Don Bauder June 15, 2017 @ 11:51 a.m.

Clear Lee Raines: I guess you could be called a political independent. Best, Don Bauder


Don Bauder June 15, 2017 @ 11:53 a.m.

Kevin Blanch: You are right: the radical right in the U.S. has the same characteristics as the Soviet Union dictatorship of yore. Best, Don Bauder


Don Bauder June 15, 2017 @ 11:56 a.m.

Mike Murphy: The executives of Edison would certainly get fried if there is a nuclear explosion at the burial site in North County. Probably the CPUC brass would not get burned badly because they live close to San Francisco. But the NRC and FEMA people would be far away. Best, Don Bauder


Don Bauder June 15, 2017 @ 11:59 a.m.

Kevin Blanch: I have had two open heart surgeries and am doing fine (the last one was in 1990) so it's possible you will be be OK, although admittedly I don't know your circumstances. Best, Don Bauder


Don Bauder June 15, 2017 @ noon

Ted Archibald: You are absolutely right. I cannot think of a worse location for nuclear waste than right near the ocean in North County. Best, Don Bauder


MURPHYJUNK June 15, 2017 @ 3:26 p.m.

maybe they figured it it was a good enough location for a power plant, its a good enough place to plant the waste.


Don Bauder June 15, 2017 @ 7:34 p.m.

Murphyjunk: That sounds like Edison logic. Best, Don Bauder


Don Bauder June 15, 2017 @ 12:01 p.m.

Ted Archibald: I am not following Hanford, but if you want to enlighten us, please do. You seem to understand the situation. Best, Don Bauder


teddybear June 16, 2017 @ 9:14 p.m.

Hanford WA processed plutonium for the Nuc bombs that hit Japan. The place is now a waste repository that is rusting and leaking. (google HANFORD LEAK). also google WORST RADIOACTIVE SITES - HANFORD is about #10 in the world. Who knows, Seattle may be the next Pripyat (the city near Chernobyl that is now abandoned.) Remember what J. Robert Oppenheimer said when he saw the first atomic bomb test - "I am become death, the destroyer of worlds" (from the Bhagavad Gita)

We have discovered the power of the atom and it seems that it will eventually destroy us - maybe slowly by creating more and more "no go radioactive hot zones" or quickly by stupid people dropping nuc bombs.

I live near Vancouver BC so I am very mindful of what HANFORD might become.

Also see WIPP - and the kitty litter fiasco that caused major problems for the high level nuc waste site. I expect more to come.


Don Bauder June 18, 2017 @ 3:06 p.m.

teddybear: What's especially so worrisome is that those bombs were dropped in 1945, and now the waste is a real threat. Think of San Diego and Orange counties 70 years from now. Best, Don Bauder


teddybear June 17, 2017 @ 12:07 p.m.

If the CASCADIA EARTHQUAKE hits then all stored nuclear waste will be spread over hundreds of square miles thus making many cities uninhabitable and many people doomed to an early death.


Don Bauder June 18, 2017 @ 3:08 p.m.

teddybear: Does the NRC have anything to say about this? Best, Don Bauder


teddybear June 22, 2017 @ noon

Don - I entered a full response about "captured agencies" but this site has a problem and it did not post. And I did it again and same. Argggg.


Don Bauder June 22, 2017 @ 3:50 p.m.

teddybear: Sorry we disappointed you. Try to post it again. Best, Don Bauder


teddybear2 June 29, 2017 @ 10:47 p.m.

Problems with password -> new username. Google CAPTURED AGENCY. This will give you an idea what is going on. Big corporations now control governments. NRC is controlled by the nuclear industry.


Don Bauder June 22, 2017 @ 3:43 p.m.

Ray Lutz: Thanks for the info. I thought Edison execs would live close enough to San Onofre to get scalded with everybody else. Best, Don Bauder


Don Bauder June 22, 2017 @ 3:46 p.m.

Roger Ervine: I wouldn't dig in the sand in front of San Onofre, just to be on the safe side. Best, Don Bauder


Don Bauder June 22, 2017 @ 3:48 p.m.

Ray Lutz: Yes, but I have mentioned Citizens Oversight in other coverage of this possible disaster. Best, Don Bauder


Sign in to comment

Let’s Be Friends

Subscribe for local event alerts, concerts tickets, promotions and more from the San Diego Reader