Anchor ads are not supported on this page.

4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs

Sweetwater school district invites more suspicion

Former felonious port commissioner David Malcolm appointed to committee

Tom Calhoun
Tom Calhoun

The Sweetwater Union High School District has four pieces of property it wants to sell.

Sweetwater real estate locations

At the December 9 board meeting, Tom Calhoun, the executive director of facilities for Sweetwater, gave a presentation on asset utilization — more to the point: what the district wants to do with the surplus property.

The disposition of property has become increasingly urgent as the district continues to deficit-spend — as the note on the L Street property comes due July 2014 — and as the district maneuvers to purchase additional land on the east side of Chula Vista.

As often is the case, the district works in circuitous and less-than-transparent ways.

Problem one: Who was appointed to the advisory committee to make recommendations to the board about the property?

At the November 18 board meeting, the district decided a 7-11, or district advisory committee, should be set up. (The committee must be comprised of between 7 and 11 members.) The committee, by education code, is supposed to reflect the community demographically and have a teacher, an administrator, a parent, and people with real estate expertise.

Some districts solicit applications for their 7-11 committees. Sweetwater chose to have each trustee appoint one person (the fact that four trustees were indicted seemed irrelevant), the superintendent appointed one, and Ramon Leyba, director of state and federal programs, appointed one.

Leyba appointed Isaura Martinez. Indicted trustee Bertha Lopez appointed Kevin O’Neill. Now-former trustee Arlie Ricasa appointed Carmelita Vinson. Indicted trustee Pearl Quiñones appointed Jim Delgado. Indicted trustee Jim Cartmill appointed Doug Kerner. Superintendent Ed Brand appointed Burt Grossman. Trustee John McCann appointed David Malcolm.

Sponsored
Sponsored

Many districts bring their slate back to the board for approval. But at the December 9 meeting, Lopez had to ask Calhoun to tell the board the names of all the people who had been appointed — and who had appointed them.

That was the same night the district was finally giving the presentation on surplus property that Lopez had been asking for over a year.

Meanwhile, the 7-11 committee had already met twice and concluded their business, declaring the Third Avenue property surplus.

Critics complain that appointments to the 7-11 committee look political. The state department’s best practices website states: “…it is important that this expanded school-closure (or surplus property) committee be perceived as objective and independent from suspected school board or other political agendas.”

To even the most casual reader, the list of appointees looks more political than reflective of the community.

One example is Burt Grossman. Two members on the board of trustees frequently challenge Brand on the dais — Quiñones and Lopez. Brand’s appointee to the 7-11 committee, Burt Grossman, ran first against Quiñones and then against Lopez in the 2012 election cycle. Contacted by email, Grossman preferred not to comment because of concerns about Brown Act violations.

David Malcolm is another name that raised eyebrows. Malcolm is a former San Diego Unified Port District commissioner who pleaded guilty to a felony conflict-of-interest charge in 2003. The felony was later expunged. (His LinkedIn profile makes no mention of his Port District employment.)

In a December 16 phone interview, the Reader had three questions for Malcolm. The questions were: What are your qualifications to be on the committee? Why did John McCann appoint you? And, have you ever expressed interest in purchasing or leasing the L Street property?

Malcolm began by saying that perhaps age qualified him for the demographics. He stated that, by way of experience, he had worked on the county assessment appeals board and has held a realtor’s license for many years.

Most importantly, Malcolm told the Reader that the committee will likely never meet again — they’ve done their work in declaring Third Avenue surplus. Malcolm said the time frame for the other properties goes into next year at best, and there will be other trustees by then.

He acknowledged he lives in San Diego but not in the district. When asked if he owned property in Chula Vista and if that made him eligible for the committee, Malcolm seemed to become upset. Among other things, he said, "You've always done whatever you can nasty against me." He ended the conversation by abruptly hanging up.

Problem Two: Education code (section 17387) dictates policy regarding surplus property: “It is the intent of the Legislature to have the community involved before decisions are made about school closure or the use of surplus space, thus avoiding community conflict and assuring building use that is compatible with the community’s needs and desires.”

So, why is the district spending thousands of dollars to have all but one piece of property entitled for high-density apartments when they have yet to engage with the community? (To entitle a piece of property means to get any zoning and licensing done with the city to sell it to a developer.)

In a December 16 email, Sweetwater facilities director Calhoun countered: “We did get the input of the community during the entitlement process on the Third Avenue property which went before the CV Planning Commission and City Council as well as holding two publicly noticed 7-11 Committee meetings. The report adopted by the 7-11 committee recommending that the Board surplus 3rd Avenue will be going to the Board in January.”

But was the public engaged in the Third Avenue area simply to approve plans for the Colony or were they given an opportunity to say what they would like to see on that site — maybe even a district office?

Problem Three: Lack of transparency: The district’s L Street property has been the subject of many articles by several media.

It has always been a screwy deal. The property was purchased under superintendent Brand’s first term in 2005 — as a location for the district office. The district paid about $34 million. The same day the property was purchased, the title was transferred to a "nonprofit" named California Trust, which is also Plan Nine Partners, LLC. The proceeds from the sale of other district properties must, according to an exchange agreement, be used to pay down the debt on L Street.

The district has already stated that it intends to seek pricey entitlements for high-density housing on the L Street property — although again the community has not been consulted.

In the December 9 surplus-land presentation, Calhoun told the trustees that Plan Nine Partners “wanted to get out from under the agreement” with the district.

Wait a minute.

According to Plan Nine Partners/California Trust CEO Marc Litchman, he sent an offer to Brand on December 6 for a long-term ground lease that would ultimately reimburse the district for its investment, create an ongoing revenue source for the district that could support classroom instruction, and that would enable the land to be used for a “state of the art academic programs and opportunities for Sweetwater students.” In a December 16 email, Calhoun acknowledged that he was aware of the offer when he made the presentation.

In a December 12 interview, Litchman said that he and other members of his board of directors are anxious to see the L Street property put to its “highest and best use.” Litchman says the most preferable choice would be to have the district go forward with the initial plan and put the district offices and corporate yard on the premises.

Litchman has also been gathering support from the community for a sports complex and charter school on the property. Regarding the charter school, he said his first step would be to work with the teachers’ union.

Problem Four: Is the committee legal? On the two agendas posted in the remote hinterlands of the chief facility executive’s website are the agendas for the slam-bam meetings on 11/21/13 and 12/5/13. Both meetings have 700 forms agendized. But the conflict-of-interest forms are not posted on the site.

On Tuesday, December 10, an email request for the 700 forms was sent to the board's clerk. On December 20 at 4:10 p.m., the Reader received this response: "The district is still in the process of collecting the Form 700's for the 7-11 committee members. We will provide the responsive documents once they have all been received. Please be advised that we will be closed the next two weeks for winter break, so we will have the documents to you in January."

(rev. 12/21, 8:25 p.m.)

Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all
Previous article

Nation’s sexy soldiers stage protest at Pendleton in wake of change in Marine uniform policy

Semper WHY?
Next Article

SDSU pres gets highest pay raise in state over last 15 years

Union-Tribune still stiffing downtown San Diego landlord?
Tom Calhoun
Tom Calhoun

The Sweetwater Union High School District has four pieces of property it wants to sell.

Sweetwater real estate locations

At the December 9 board meeting, Tom Calhoun, the executive director of facilities for Sweetwater, gave a presentation on asset utilization — more to the point: what the district wants to do with the surplus property.

The disposition of property has become increasingly urgent as the district continues to deficit-spend — as the note on the L Street property comes due July 2014 — and as the district maneuvers to purchase additional land on the east side of Chula Vista.

As often is the case, the district works in circuitous and less-than-transparent ways.

Problem one: Who was appointed to the advisory committee to make recommendations to the board about the property?

At the November 18 board meeting, the district decided a 7-11, or district advisory committee, should be set up. (The committee must be comprised of between 7 and 11 members.) The committee, by education code, is supposed to reflect the community demographically and have a teacher, an administrator, a parent, and people with real estate expertise.

Some districts solicit applications for their 7-11 committees. Sweetwater chose to have each trustee appoint one person (the fact that four trustees were indicted seemed irrelevant), the superintendent appointed one, and Ramon Leyba, director of state and federal programs, appointed one.

Leyba appointed Isaura Martinez. Indicted trustee Bertha Lopez appointed Kevin O’Neill. Now-former trustee Arlie Ricasa appointed Carmelita Vinson. Indicted trustee Pearl Quiñones appointed Jim Delgado. Indicted trustee Jim Cartmill appointed Doug Kerner. Superintendent Ed Brand appointed Burt Grossman. Trustee John McCann appointed David Malcolm.

Sponsored
Sponsored

Many districts bring their slate back to the board for approval. But at the December 9 meeting, Lopez had to ask Calhoun to tell the board the names of all the people who had been appointed — and who had appointed them.

That was the same night the district was finally giving the presentation on surplus property that Lopez had been asking for over a year.

Meanwhile, the 7-11 committee had already met twice and concluded their business, declaring the Third Avenue property surplus.

Critics complain that appointments to the 7-11 committee look political. The state department’s best practices website states: “…it is important that this expanded school-closure (or surplus property) committee be perceived as objective and independent from suspected school board or other political agendas.”

To even the most casual reader, the list of appointees looks more political than reflective of the community.

One example is Burt Grossman. Two members on the board of trustees frequently challenge Brand on the dais — Quiñones and Lopez. Brand’s appointee to the 7-11 committee, Burt Grossman, ran first against Quiñones and then against Lopez in the 2012 election cycle. Contacted by email, Grossman preferred not to comment because of concerns about Brown Act violations.

David Malcolm is another name that raised eyebrows. Malcolm is a former San Diego Unified Port District commissioner who pleaded guilty to a felony conflict-of-interest charge in 2003. The felony was later expunged. (His LinkedIn profile makes no mention of his Port District employment.)

In a December 16 phone interview, the Reader had three questions for Malcolm. The questions were: What are your qualifications to be on the committee? Why did John McCann appoint you? And, have you ever expressed interest in purchasing or leasing the L Street property?

Malcolm began by saying that perhaps age qualified him for the demographics. He stated that, by way of experience, he had worked on the county assessment appeals board and has held a realtor’s license for many years.

Most importantly, Malcolm told the Reader that the committee will likely never meet again — they’ve done their work in declaring Third Avenue surplus. Malcolm said the time frame for the other properties goes into next year at best, and there will be other trustees by then.

He acknowledged he lives in San Diego but not in the district. When asked if he owned property in Chula Vista and if that made him eligible for the committee, Malcolm seemed to become upset. Among other things, he said, "You've always done whatever you can nasty against me." He ended the conversation by abruptly hanging up.

Problem Two: Education code (section 17387) dictates policy regarding surplus property: “It is the intent of the Legislature to have the community involved before decisions are made about school closure or the use of surplus space, thus avoiding community conflict and assuring building use that is compatible with the community’s needs and desires.”

So, why is the district spending thousands of dollars to have all but one piece of property entitled for high-density apartments when they have yet to engage with the community? (To entitle a piece of property means to get any zoning and licensing done with the city to sell it to a developer.)

In a December 16 email, Sweetwater facilities director Calhoun countered: “We did get the input of the community during the entitlement process on the Third Avenue property which went before the CV Planning Commission and City Council as well as holding two publicly noticed 7-11 Committee meetings. The report adopted by the 7-11 committee recommending that the Board surplus 3rd Avenue will be going to the Board in January.”

But was the public engaged in the Third Avenue area simply to approve plans for the Colony or were they given an opportunity to say what they would like to see on that site — maybe even a district office?

Problem Three: Lack of transparency: The district’s L Street property has been the subject of many articles by several media.

It has always been a screwy deal. The property was purchased under superintendent Brand’s first term in 2005 — as a location for the district office. The district paid about $34 million. The same day the property was purchased, the title was transferred to a "nonprofit" named California Trust, which is also Plan Nine Partners, LLC. The proceeds from the sale of other district properties must, according to an exchange agreement, be used to pay down the debt on L Street.

The district has already stated that it intends to seek pricey entitlements for high-density housing on the L Street property — although again the community has not been consulted.

In the December 9 surplus-land presentation, Calhoun told the trustees that Plan Nine Partners “wanted to get out from under the agreement” with the district.

Wait a minute.

According to Plan Nine Partners/California Trust CEO Marc Litchman, he sent an offer to Brand on December 6 for a long-term ground lease that would ultimately reimburse the district for its investment, create an ongoing revenue source for the district that could support classroom instruction, and that would enable the land to be used for a “state of the art academic programs and opportunities for Sweetwater students.” In a December 16 email, Calhoun acknowledged that he was aware of the offer when he made the presentation.

In a December 12 interview, Litchman said that he and other members of his board of directors are anxious to see the L Street property put to its “highest and best use.” Litchman says the most preferable choice would be to have the district go forward with the initial plan and put the district offices and corporate yard on the premises.

Litchman has also been gathering support from the community for a sports complex and charter school on the property. Regarding the charter school, he said his first step would be to work with the teachers’ union.

Problem Four: Is the committee legal? On the two agendas posted in the remote hinterlands of the chief facility executive’s website are the agendas for the slam-bam meetings on 11/21/13 and 12/5/13. Both meetings have 700 forms agendized. But the conflict-of-interest forms are not posted on the site.

On Tuesday, December 10, an email request for the 700 forms was sent to the board's clerk. On December 20 at 4:10 p.m., the Reader received this response: "The district is still in the process of collecting the Form 700's for the 7-11 committee members. We will provide the responsive documents once they have all been received. Please be advised that we will be closed the next two weeks for winter break, so we will have the documents to you in January."

(rev. 12/21, 8:25 p.m.)

Comments
Sponsored
Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all
Previous article

Nation’s sexy soldiers stage protest at Pendleton in wake of change in Marine uniform policy

Semper WHY?
Next Article

OSHA rules wall falls our fault

Who, U.S.?
Comments
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed Big Screen — Movie commentary Blurt — Music's inside track Booze News — San Diego spirits Classical Music — Immortal beauty Classifieds — Free and easy Cover Stories — Front-page features Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts Feast! — Food & drink reviews Feature Stories — Local news & stories Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore From the Archives — Spotlight on the past Golden Dreams — Talk of the town The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it Letters — Our inbox Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news News Ticker — News & politics Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated Poetry — The old and the new Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers Reading — The hunt for intellectuals Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds SD on the QT — Almost factual news Sheep and Goats — Places of worship Special Issues — The best of Street Style — San Diego streets have style Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves Theater — On stage in San Diego this week Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads Your Week — Daily event picks
4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs
Close

Anchor ads are not supported on this page.