Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Archives
Classifieds
Stories
Events
Contests
Music
Movies
Theater
Food
Legal Guide
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
In San Diego, Sherrod Says She'll Sue Breitbart
So this blogger puts edited video of her on the internet, the NAACP, who has the entire unedited video, then called on the current administration, who also had the entire unedited video, to fire her, reportedly under pressure from the White House she was fired. After all this happened, and after they went back and watched the full video again, she was offered her job back, within 24 hours of losing it. Do I have this right? Okay, what harm has been done to this woman? She was unemployed against her will for less than 24 hours, she was most likely offered a big raise if she returned to work, is highly sought after for speaking engagements across the nation, and was personally apologized to by the President of the United States. With all that, I am trying to figure out what "she deserves justice" really means. She wasn't physically harmed and actually made money and gained national fame and sympathy. So this blogger, who definitely wasn't playing nice, caused her no actual harm and made her money, but she still wants to sue him for what? We are entirely too sue happy in this country, no wonder we are all getting more and more miserable in our daily lives.— July 29, 2010 6:25 p.m.