Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Print Edition
Classifieds
Stories
Events
Contests
Music
Movies
Theater
Food
Life Events
Cannabis
April 24, 2024
April 17, 2024
April 10, 2024
April 2, 2024
March 27, 2024
March 20, 2024
March 13, 2024
March 6, 2024
February 28, 2024
February 21, 2024
February 14, 2024
February 7, 2024
Close
April 24, 2024
April 17, 2024
April 10, 2024
April 2, 2024
March 27, 2024
March 20, 2024
March 13, 2024
March 6, 2024
February 28, 2024
February 21, 2024
February 14, 2024
February 7, 2024
April 24, 2024
April 17, 2024
April 10, 2024
April 2, 2024
March 27, 2024
March 20, 2024
March 13, 2024
March 6, 2024
February 28, 2024
February 21, 2024
February 14, 2024
February 7, 2024
Close
Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Mountain-bikers don't want illegal trails either
I get really frustrated when neglect and inaction on the part of the CDFW gets projected onto people using the land. There are certainly far more "illegal trails" than necessary, but that is because there are no apparent legal trails. Right now it is a wild west of neglect out there -- nothing is marked, CDFW 'rangers' randomly throw up signs or put up dangerous obstacles on random trails, riders are angry, the CDFW is angry, and nothing good is coming of the situation. This could be fixed so easily. Even the article says: "Nygaard stressed how the nearby Lake Calavera Preserve serves as a prime example of an area riddled with illegal trails that was corralled into something more legal and organized." Exactly! So the logical conclusion is that the CDFW land should follow this model. First, all parties need to agree that this public land needs to be accessible to the public in some form, both on feet and on bikes. It sits in the middle of a city of 113,000 people and growing. You can't prevent that many people from using this land -- no number of signs or fences around such a perimeter will protect the land. It is a miracle and a blessing that the land hasn't been developed, and we all want it to remain that way. I think history clearly shows us that having people use, enjoy, and care about a natural space is critical for that space's longevity. Open spaces need as many friends as they can gather. Next, a small group of riders and reps from CDFW and Preserve Calavera need to sit down and come up with a small number of trails that (a) are least likely to negatively affect soils and habitats, (b) protect the areas of the land that are the most sensitive, and (c) offer riders a reasonable number of interesting and varied trails that connect together in a logical way and allow for longer rides to be formed. Yes, not everyone will be happy. Yes, some 'favorite trails' will close. But I think that is a much better situation than what we've got now. Boards with these LEGAL trail maps then need to be posted at all entrances. Trails not on this list are then closed off with boundary signs. Legal trails then need to be marked at their starting points, and preferably named. If funding issues are the reason for CDFW's seeming ongoing neglect of the land, then it should be put under the "CDFW Lands Pass" program, where they can raise a bit of money and use that money to manage the property properly.— January 24, 2018 8:48 a.m.