bunburry
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Close to Home — What it’s like on the street where you live
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Bunny v. Bunny
I genuinely hope the San Diego Reader acknowledges their error in being favorable towards this band, who acted inappropriately towards a respectable and established band. The fact that the boy king claimed "we quickly realized that we actually have the upper hand and a very solid course of action against him if it comes to a court case" should be taken as being disingenuous and just wrong. You appear to have been lazy in choosing a band name and it appears that you are trying to get free publicity from gullible newspaper reporters. Get your act together San Diego Reader...— October 30, 2012 1:55 p.m.
Bunny v. Bunny
Couldn't agree more...great point. I'm glad someone brought this young pretender to order. Just because he hasn't heard of something, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. If I claim I never heard of the "Arctic Monkeys", could I call my band that?? NO!— October 30, 2012 1:45 p.m.
Bunny v. Bunny
Yeah I love they way he said that they've been 'Bunny Gang' since the beginning, i.e. 3 years after the actual 'Bunny Gang' set up. And the way the article states that they "did not file his application for the trademark and service mark for “Bunny Gang” with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office until August 28, 2012". You know, because every British band should register themselves in the U.S. just in case they get famous! This band did not have a leg to stand on legally - that is why they changed their name. What a shower of jokers!!!— October 30, 2012 1:40 p.m.