Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Archives
Classifieds
Stories
Events
Contests
Music
Movies
Theater
Food
Legal Guide
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Border Patrol agents may testify
Vis, not only would the criminal threat of "killing" someone be a felony 422 beef, that is also a "strike" offense when charged as a felony. So you are 100% correct, the old double standard is alive and well here......— February 6, 2013 11:57 a.m.
El Cajon Police dog attacks La Mesa officer
#But when officers from El Cajon released their dog, instead of proceeding to the crawl space it instead turned and charged a group of La Mesa officers standing about 15 feet away. LOL...that gave me a veyr good chuckle!— February 6, 2013 10:48 a.m.
Top Gun brought back in IMAX 3D (for those who care)
There HAS to be an error :)— February 6, 2013 10:47 a.m.
Border Patrol agents may testify
#Multiple witnesses testified that they heard Gerald Torello threaten to “kill” someone if they spoke again to his companion, Kallie Helwig; OK, if that is true then the 422 is a FELONY criminal threats beef, NOT a misdemeanor.— February 6, 2013 10:43 a.m.
Border Patrol agents may testify
Multiple witnesses?? How many? Unless they had direct confirmation of the sex acts I don't know if it is that solid. I hope the two defendants take the stand and give THEIR side of the story, because if they don't I think they are going down, their only hope would be to give their side and hope they had a credible explanation.— February 6, 2013 10:42 a.m.
Did you charge more than $100,000 on your expense account?
It's called crony capitalism.— February 6, 2013 10:36 a.m.
Mary Jo White fretted about "aggressive" regulator
Don, it goes to show you that those DAR's, the digital recording devices, can prove exactly what goes down in a police/citizen encounter, and that recording cuts both ways, protecting the cop from bogus complaints, and protecting the citizen from dirty cops.— February 6, 2013 7:43 a.m.
Bonnie Dumanis kicks off campaign for fourth-term as District Attorney
#What about Bonnie's continued crusade, along with Duffy, against the pot dispensaries? I can't STAND Duffy or Dumbass, but the policy of the US Attorneys office is dictated by the President, it is policy set in Washington, DC, not locally. So as much as I cannot stand either of these clowns, the pot issue is not an issue that Duffy has any discretion over, and we cannot blame her for the policy on pot.— February 5, 2013 11:38 p.m.
Top Gun brought back in IMAX 3D (for those who care)
You guys are way too harsh on a GREAT movie!!!!!!!!!!!! I cannot vouch for the reality of it, but i did love the picture!— February 5, 2013 10:43 p.m.
Mary Jo White fretted about "aggressive" regulator
#Don, it's not only the militarization (though that is deadly serious)...it's also about "testifying" under oath, so casually done every day by almost every cop This is sooo funny that you mention testilying, as I was stopped for, of all things, an alleged violation of an "obstructed license plate" (BS). I will make a long story short, the cop was a young kid with probably just 1 or 2 years under his belt and he tried to give me the third degree on things like what was I doing, where was I going, blah blah blah. I was trying to be cool, but this ass clown thought he was Super Cop and was so aggressive that he finally set me off. I finally laid the law down to him, told him question time was over and to either write up a ticket or get the hell out of Dodge. He wrote the ticket. I went to court to fight it- as I do all tickets even an obstructed license plate- and this douchebag claimed that I had "admitted" to him that my bumper was obstructed. Problem is I never made such an admission, and the claim was even more improbable as I had requested the traffic citation be set for trial at the "county seat", which proves the ticket was being contested. What a lying POS dirtbag! But this was a MAJOR mistake on his part, as he was wearing what is known as a "Digital Audio Recorder" ("DAR") during the traffic stop, that recorded everything he said, and everything I said. DAR'S are for the safety of the cop- but also the public as it records exactly what goes down. His second gigantic problem is the traffic court was **ALSO ** recording everything he said in court, including the claim that I "admitted" the bumper was obstructed. I had him, and I had him dead-to-rights. He was toast, he just didn't know it yet. His ticket was tossed, now I had legal standing/status to sue. I wrote his Chief, explained in excruciating detail the perjury by his officer, I told him he owed me $2,500 for the time I spent and if the didn't pay up I would sue as many parties as I could, and promptly received no reply. The next a major problem for Dirty Young Cop is I am very experienced in suing cops in federal court, and that is exactly what happened, and $20,000+ later Dirty Young Cop learned his lesson and now has a federal police misconduct lawsuit under his belt.— February 5, 2013 4:32 p.m.