Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Print Edition
Classifieds
Stories
Events
Contests
Music
Movies
Theater
Food
Life Events
Cannabis
May 1, 2024
April 24, 2024
April 17, 2024
April 10, 2024
April 2, 2024
March 27, 2024
March 20, 2024
March 13, 2024
March 6, 2024
February 28, 2024
February 21, 2024
February 14, 2024
Close
May 1, 2024
April 24, 2024
April 17, 2024
April 10, 2024
April 2, 2024
March 27, 2024
March 20, 2024
March 13, 2024
March 6, 2024
February 28, 2024
February 21, 2024
February 14, 2024
May 1, 2024
April 24, 2024
April 17, 2024
April 10, 2024
April 2, 2024
March 27, 2024
March 20, 2024
March 13, 2024
March 6, 2024
February 28, 2024
February 21, 2024
February 14, 2024
Close
Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Don’t take this personal, Joe
Thank you for proving my point. You write as though you have inferred that my exchange with Mr. Gonzalez was ordered by (or at least known by) the City Attorney. If so, you are wrong on either count. I speak for myself. My issue was with Mr. Gonzalez and had nothing to do with any matters related to Mr. Briggs and the City of SanDiego.— June 28, 2015 1:11 p.m.
Don’t take this personal, Joe
Truly a high class response Mr. Gonzalez. Not since Melville has the English language had a wordsmith of your caliber. But what did Diogenes get wrong? And who chose to pass this personal exchange between you and me, this event that was "no story at all" to the Reader? Do you agree with Diogenes that the entire exchange should be printed? Shouldn't the readers see your clever turn of a phrase? Who but a consummate professional like Marco Gonzalez can fit words like "Dude" and "Duh" into his messages to opposing counsel or brag about the fact that he tried to distort a commonplace event into appearing as unethical conduct solely because he saw an opportunity for "setting up" the City Attorney's Office so that he might be awarded attorneys' fees from the taxpayers he claims he is trying to protect? You weren't "simply" asking about a hearing on a closed case. You have already admitted you initiated the whole exchange and wrote it the way you did in the hopes of turning this non-story into money directly into your pocket. You are quite the guardian of the public fisc.— June 17, 2015 12:32 a.m.
Don’t take this personal, Joe
Key points from Diogenes--100% accurate: * The fact that lawyers have heated words means little unless the exact context is provided. * If a hearing date for an ex parte hearing was reserved, then there is no story here at all. * Just reading documents does not always provide the necessary context. * I read what Mr. Cordileone said. If I understand it, he says that he reserved an ex parte date. Is that what actually happened? Then Marco Gonzalez was blowing smoke. * This is an example of reading emails without the full context.— June 16, 2015 1 p.m.