Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Archives
Classifieds
Stories
Events
Contests
Music
Movies
Theater
Food
Legal Guide
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Ex pros in San Diego: Ron Mix, Todd Washington, Eddie George, Matt Birk, Lamond Murray Geoff Miller
I knew, years ago, a former professional football player working at the same seasonal job making minimum wage plus room and board. He told me how it all came so quick, and left so fast. He was sometimes unable to walk with the unbearable pain in his knees. He had attended three years of "college" before he turned pro. When the job was over, I helped him fill in his unemployment form. He couldn't read or write. He was a great guy, admired and pampered for a few years with clothes, cars and women, then dumped. He left San Diego when I lent him enough money for a bus to Texas where he hoped to get a job as a helper on a construction site. How many college players never even make it to the pros? What do they do after this? If they've neglected to learn much in school, which is reported to be common, how will they contribute to society and care for themselves? More wasteful is the displacement effect. The money we shower on athletics, in effect free training for the professional sports entertainment businesses, is money not spent on actual education. The talents we waste on the ball fields are talents not applied to other areas of life. In this economic crisis, when classes are being cut, could we examine whether it's really wise to continue making semi-pro "college" games a priority in our country? Shouldn't we invest our money, and the efforts of our most talented hard-working young people, in something more worthy?— November 7, 2009 9:53 p.m.
For Cliff Sitters
JF, right on again. ADA in firehouses?! Uh, if you're in a wheelchair, I'm guessing it's not a great idea to become a professional firefighter. Dispatcher...great. But slinging hose? Nuh uh... You are absolutely correct about surge capabilities. I think we agree that firefighting/paramedic work, though fluctuating daily, has a certain average level...until we're hit with a firestorm and we suddenly require ten times the resources. It would make sense to me that developers in the back country areas, and existing homeowners on canyon edge properties, ought to be able to forward locate equipment and water infrastructure at strategic places. Further, residents of the neighborhood ought to be trained on how to prepare that equipment and basic operations so they're helping before firefighters even arrive. The locals should also have responsibility for evacuation routines, with elderly and vulnerable people identified in advance. So much we could do to improve fire safety in San Diego. So much we could do to improve almost any operation of our local governments. For such a smart and beautiful place, why do we have such corrupt, wasteful, and sometimes criminally stupid government?— November 7, 2009 8:52 p.m.
Shield for All
Men watching female soccer makes a lot of sense. I, for one, have never understood the men who watch other men on the field, adjusting their crotches, patting each other on the butt... Strangely, not participating in or appreciating these homoerotic sports in modern America is considered somehow unpatriotic and "gay". Strange society. As to welfare cheats, in San Diego it's considerably harder to get benefits from the county than in other places in the state. This is largely the work of a few crusaders a decade and a half ago and some favorable editorials in the UT denouncing the scammers. The unfortunate result, in hard times like these, is the same policies often prevent deserving and eligible folks from receiving these emergency benefits they've paid for in taxes all these years. Meanwhile our glorious political establishment is raiding the grandkids piggy banks to pay for convention centers, city halls, libraries, and stadiums downtown for the benefit of the privilaged few who will blow their profits on extravagances and puffery...and campaign contributions of course. While directing outrage at the little scammers who, as Cuddle pointed out, amount to very small losses, the same politicians and media insiders promote giveaways to big time crooks.— November 6, 2009 10:55 p.m.
Employment Numbers Worse Than Reported, but Main Street's Pain Is Wall Street's Gain
I read somewhere recently that one of the effects of white collar workers becoming underemployed long term is that recruiting volunteers for political campaigns has never been easier. Intelligent, reliable, hard working, efficient and well connected professionals who would rather interact than sit alone at home can make a big difference politically. Imagine how effective a political force these underemployed can potentially become. Consider the "teabaggers". How many of them are able to participate precisely because they're underemployed?— November 6, 2009 9:38 p.m.
For Cliff Sitters
JF, your explanation sounds spot on. Jeez! Instead of residents donating money for benches, you'd think the city would be glad to allow them to install them personally...but we all know that's against the rules too. And that's a pity. Look at the houses along Sunset Cliffs. The homeowners could afford to collectively install something fantastic for the public to better access and appreciate the place, making their homes more valuable in the process. Instead they'll get city benches, guaranteed ugly, expensive, and (probably) designed more to keep homeless people sleeping than to allow the public to sit comfortably and watch the sunset.— November 6, 2009 9:32 p.m.
Did Dominelli Study Ponzi?
San Diego scams continue unabated as well. The biggest involve government money. I need not repeat the notorious frauds involving the stadium and ballpark, bribery of public officials, political payoffs, employment of former city managers, and so on... But have a look at CCDC. It issued or underwrote bonds for how many of downtown's see-through condo buildings and office towers? How much are we on the hook for? Does anyone know? As the markets continue to splatter, and these buildings are defaulted on, who has to pay off that debt WE guaranteed because it was part of "redevelopment"? Oh, San Diego is so pretty, so likeable...and so dumb.— November 6, 2009 9:26 p.m.
Did Dominelli Study Ponzi?
Back to Ponzi schemes... I have zero expectation of getting any money ever from any government. Though I have paid plenty in taxes over the years for the retirement I'll never receive, at least I was able to resist the endless calls over the last fifteen years to "invest in the market for your future". A dollar put into the market ten years ago is worth what today? The game was rigged. It's not only social security that won't pay out, it's all those 401Ks that might turn out to be nothing but paper when it's time to pay out. How on earth can finance represent such a huge proportion of our economy for so long? It should be the clerical process of allocating and negotiating prices and such...an administrative overheard, and a cost to the economy, not a revenue generator. When we look for our lost money in the coming decades, maybe we'll point back to the present time and realize that none of it existed in the first place, and what little "real" money there was originally has disappeared into the pockets of the fraudsters on top.— November 6, 2009 9:22 p.m.
Did Dominelli Study Ponzi?
Don, the heavens have aligned. Russl and I both agree that it's "poli" rather than "poly". Rather than simply quote some boring old dictionary, let's test it the newfangled way... Go to Google. Type "polisci". Click Search. Note that all the top results are related to political science. Now search "polysci". While there are results that are related to the study of politics, it's mixed in with scientific firms that claim to engage in a multitude of disciplines. This is because "poly" is entymologically "poly- repr Gr. polu-, comb. form of polús, polú much, pl. polloi many" (source http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O27-poly.html) But "politics" is derived from the Greek word for citizen "polites", which is derived from the word for city..."polis". Therefore poly-sci and poli-sci are logically quite different things. I'm sure Heather and Russl will both agree that although I once studied poli-sci at SDSU, my current responsibilities with a multitude of technologies requires me to understand "poly-science". The shortening of "political science" into "polisci" might have happened after WWII when the acronym accustomed former GIs arrived on campus. But let's be absolutely sure...we'll check what the University of San Diego calls it today -- poly- or poli-sci. The answer is in the web address itself, which is: www.sandiego.edu/cas/polisci/ As to the $10 I could have hypothetically earned for reporting this most trivial misusage by my hero Don Bauder, I'd rather see that go to the commenter who is homeless, studying at City College, and logs on to the Reader at the library downtown. She needs it more than me...any way, oh mighty Reader powers, to get that to her? :-) Fred Williams President Don Bauder Fan Club— November 6, 2009 9:12 p.m.
Hard Water, Question Mark
Ask-clamation?! Yes!— November 6, 2009 8:38 p.m.
Defense, Fire Reconstruction Propel San Diego Economy
Tourism represents 4.5% of our economy, but seems to receive a huge percentage of government subsidies and incentives. When I look at the percentages for finance and insurance, I'm a bit suprised. San Diego doesn't seem to be a center for these industries. I wonder how much of that percentage will turn out to be phoney-baloney paper-shuffling that represents no genuine economic activity at all...— November 5, 2009 11:53 p.m.