Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Archives
Classifieds
Stories
Events
Contests
Music
Movies
Theater
Food
Legal Guide
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
City decks NFL proposal with lots of folly
And the gullible rabble of suckers will vote for it, their social instincts appropriated by The Great Manipulators to convince them that a bunch of billionaires and multimillionaires are "home teams." They will suck the rest of us into this black hole and banish us from the paradise of "America's Finest City" to slabs on the desert and other places more befitting our economic status.— December 30, 2015 9:55 p.m.
San Diego won’t be any more affordable next year
Oops! I opened myself up to more digression--nay, displacement activity. Why can't she (or s/he) be used as a gender-neutral pronoun as well as "he?" So back to the point. Regardless of the sex of the "victim," when one DEMANDS or lusts after some consumer product that is not essential to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, one is claiming to "need" something that is EXCESS to true needs. This leads to an imbalance of resources out of proportion to fundamental need. Just because we take "prosperity" (and an ever-increasing level of DEMAND) for granted, it does not erase the fact that we are eroding the same resource-base from which true NEEDS are drawn. By fulfilling our fantasies of endless "progress," we are making the potential for meeting true needs scarcer and scarcer.— December 29, 2015 8:38 p.m.
San Diego won’t be any more affordable next year
If I may be so presumptuous as to "correct" you, you have conflated need and greed. The victim may SAY she "needs" that much money, but there is no proof that she needs it vs WANTS it. I must presume that you do "get it," but are just having fun. I'm still serious.— December 28, 2015 3:38 p.m.
San Diego won’t be any more affordable next year
Just add grr. But I'm serious. Greed and need ARE conflated. THAT'S the problem. The distinction is crucial, but it's ignored.— December 28, 2015 1:07 a.m.
San Diego won’t be any more affordable next year
Greed and need need not be conflated.— December 26, 2015 12:59 p.m.
Mark Twain speaks again in St. Louis
I agree on both counts.— December 25, 2015 6:49 p.m.
San Diego won’t be any more affordable next year
Additional link: https://peterlachnewinsky.wordpress.com/2012/05/1… https://peterlachnewinsky.wordpress.com/2012/05/1…— December 24, 2015 6:44 p.m.
San Diego won’t be any more affordable next year
Good ol' Ron Cobb said it best: http://creativeclassics.blogspot.com/2006/01/la-p…— December 24, 2015 6:14 p.m.
Mark Twain speaks again in St. Louis
No--you are, aren't you?— December 24, 2015 6:05 p.m.
San Diego won’t be any more affordable next year
Even a parasite "knows" better than to suck all of its prey dry. When the Great Shift of wealth happens, who will buy more and more and more TV's, stadiums, and the vast array of trinkets to salve our souls?— December 24, 2015 9:24 a.m.