One of seven proposed neighborhoods in the Merriam Mountains.
  • One of seven proposed neighborhoods in the Merriam Mountains.
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

To North Country residents living near Merriam Mountains, it feels like Dr. Frankenstein is bringing that monster back to life. A monster called urban sprawl the community chased out of their backcountry in 2010.

"If you look closely, you can still see old Native American marks across the land, along with old rock carvings from passersby in the early 1900s."

Stop Newland Sierra

Back then, the mammoth housing development was called Merriam Mountains. It's now called Newland Sierra, but the opposition's pitchforks are jabbing at the same worries: density, traffic, wildfire evacuations, water, air quality, noise, views, greenhouse gas emissions, general plan amendments, and the matter of blasting apart a mountain range formed when dinosaurs still roamed the earth.

Michael Beck at June planning commission hearing:"So the policy doesn't say what I read it to say and that is that you need to mitigate in the county?"

Abagail Henry, San Marcos native, started a Stop Newland Sierra Facebook page a couple years ago. She said Merriam Mountains are special to her and others who've gotten engaged there and who hold memorials for people and animals. "If you look closely, you can still see old Native American marks across the land, along with old rock carvings from passer-bys in the early 1900s."

A team of well-connected ladies and lads have been lobbying the county hard for Newland. From June's meeting, Phil Rath at podium and city planning commissioner Jim Whalen in red tie in back.

Henry said Twin Oaks Valley (San Marcos) residents are no strangers to blasting, having had "to endure blasting from two different rock quarries since the early-1980s." Residents say the worst of it is the fine dust that covers everything, making it difficult to breath.

Deer Springs Road winding toward the I-15 past the Golden Door.

Kathe Robbins

The proposed project within Merriam Mountains is along the I-15 corridor in San Marcos (unincorporated area), east of Vista and north of Escondido, sandwiched between the communities of Twin Oaks Valley and Hidden Meadows.

Bobcat at Robbins ranch on August 20.

Kathe Robbins, a retired teacher, lives 1.2 miles away and can view the hilltops where Newland Sierra homes are proposed. She moved to Twin Oaks Valley in 1985 to live in a more rural setting to raise her children and to grow her own food. "We traded convenience for space." Robbins said this is the third time in thirty years a developer has come to "carve out giant pieces of our granite mountain" to develop "a new city the size of Del Mar."

Robbins' main concerns are the destruction of the mountain that hundreds of wildlife call home (county staff said blasting will take five years), how approving this project ignores the county's 2011 general plan (that down-zoned Merriam Mountains), and how the developer is not building the needed infrastructure before building homes.

As Robbins was gearing up for battle at the September 26 county board of supervisor's hearing, she received some welcome news on September 13. A superior court judge issued a stay on the approval of projects in unincorporated areas of San Diego that rely on offsetting greenhouse gas emissions with purchased carbon credits from out of the country. The lawsuit was filed by the Sierra Club and Golden Door (luxury spa across from project).

February 2018 guidelines (part of the county's climate action plan) state that projects requiring general plan amendments, that might intensify greenhouse gas emissions, are allowed to purchase carbon offset credits to make up for any emissions they can't manage with onsite design and mitigation. Opponents say the county's claim to be a leader in fighting climate change doesn't jive with paving urban sprawl with tens of millions in carbon credits.

Newland Sierra has touted their project as the county's "first carbon neutral community." Their technical report points to carbon credits. While these credits don't change the actual environmental impacts to a community, it allows Newland to legally make the "carbon neutral" claim.

At June's planning commission hearing, commissioner Michael Beck asked county staff about greenhouse emission policies that "require mitigation to occur in the county." Staff said they didn't interpret the policy to mean that all emissions need to be mitigated within the county.

Beck replied, "So the policy doesn't say what I read it to say and that is that you need to mitigate in the county? That policy doesn't say that?" Staff replied, "That's not the way the county interprets that policy. No."

The next court date for the carbon credits lawsuit is December 21, leaving some to wonder if Newland Sierra's upcoming hearing will be rescheduled. Developers likely have the votes with the current make-up of the board.

The future is less certain with two long-serving supervisors termed out this year (Bill Horn and Ron Roberts) and two more termed out in 2020 (Greg Cox and Dianne Jacob).

Two Republican candidates vying for supervisor seats in 2018 are likely to vote Newland's way (former district attorney Bonnie Dumanis and San Marcos mayor Jim Desmond), while two Democrat candidates are less certain to (former state assembly member Nathan Fletcher and legislative analyst Michelle Gomez).

Dumanis and Fletcher are vying for Roberts' seat and Desmond and Gomez are vying for Horn's seat. Desmond is Horn's pick to replace him and both Desmond and Dumanis are endorsed by the building industry association or BIA. At a February BIA event, Dumanis said she would not support an initiative requiring countywide public voting for general plan amendments in unincorporated areas (think Lilac Hills). This initiative is likely to be on the 2020 ballot.

Rita Brandin of Newland (Newland Sierra front-person) is vice chair of the BIA PAC (consists mostly of homebuilders) that endorses Desmond and Dumanis and doesn't support statewide measure Proposition 10 or a local measure in National City (rent control).

In July, supervisors unanimously voted through (Jacob absent) one bundle of three projects (3,850 homes) south of Newland Sierra in San Dieguito (Harmony Grove and Valliano) and in Otay Mesa (Otay 250).

The county is bundling these large projects because they're only allowed to amend the general plan four times a calendar year (bundled projects count as one amendment). Watching planning commissioner David Pallinger and county development services director hash this out on video, it sounded like a loophole to me. A lawsuit was reportedly filed against the board of supervisors about this.

If the board votes through Newland Sierra (2135 homes) in September and in December votes through another bundle (Lilac Hills, Warner Ranch, and Otay Ranch Village: 4056 homes), that will be 10,000 homes approved in three hearings. Voters defeated Lilac Hills in 2016.

  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

Comments

Julie Stalmer Sept. 25, 2018 @ 12:19 p.m.

After publication, Kathe Robbins let me know that the court ruled today to not stay the board of supervisors hearing (Newland Sierra's hearing will go ahead Wednesday, Sep 26). Robbins is leading a bus load of people from Twin Oaks Valley to the hearing tomorrow.

A petition will be circulated starting Saturday for a referendum. More than 120,000 signatures are needed within 30 days.

0

Cassander Sept. 25, 2018 @ 1:30 p.m.

This is the same BIA that pushed the Climate Action Plan and density at the sacrifice of quality of life on the city with the argument that "we have to build up, not out." Yet here they are at the county level, gutting environmental protections and dynamiting mountains to accommodate sprawl.

Remember this hypocrisy the next time you read BIA president Borre Winckel have the gall to call anyone in San Diego other than himself "disgusting." https://www.kpbs.org/news/2016/nov/22/san-diego-housing-crisis-forges-new-alliance-yimby/

0

Julie Stalmer Sept. 25, 2018 @ 2:21 p.m.

As people testified at the June hearing, I noted who they were and looked into each one of them. I was just curious because I catch a lot of proponents at city council and planning commission meetings that pretend they are concerned citizens when in fact they are hired guns or have some connection to someone working for the opposition or applicant (and neglect to disclose that). When you look at BIA's project greenlight, you can see why so many proponents flooded meetings. And why. It waters down the opposition numbers. Even if it's not a project they are affiliated with, they know the favor will be returned when they need it.

1

Cassander Sept. 25, 2018 @ 2:30 p.m.

And I'm sure you also see Circulate San Diego at these meetings as well. They're also paid to shill but claim to be a charity, and espouse "smart growth" for urban areas but then endorse the opposite, such as the original One Paseo and now running a highway through Civita. Their only unifying "principle" is that developers should get their way, all the time and everywhere. And with the same big builder donors footing for the astroturf, it's no wonder, https://circulatesd.nationbuilder.com/corporate

0

Visduh Sept. 25, 2018 @ 3:47 p.m.

Today, 9/25, the U-T ran its lead editorial in favor of approval of this development. That would not have been surprising a few years back when either Manchester or the Copley Press ran the rag. Now I do find it a bit surprising, because the editorials are usually those of the LAT. In this case, since it was a purely San Diego County matter, the Times probably didn't care, and let the locals write the piece.

0

Julie Stalmer Sept. 26, 2018 @ 12:51 p.m.

The funny thing about Nimbyism is that it's only that if it's not in one's own neighborhood. It seems to be the way that works.

0

Julie Stalmer Sept. 26, 2018 @ 1:39 p.m.

Right now, a resident that lives across from the proposed project is giving testimony as to why he doesn't believe Newland Sierra is different enough from Merriam Mountains (with charts/graphs).

Live feed here: http://sdcounty.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=9&event_id=1013

0

Julie Stalmer Sept. 26, 2018 @ 4:45 p.m.

The board voted YES on Newland Sierra (Jacob absent)

Supervisor Bill Horn: "I think this is a good project." Horn said he hasn't added a lot of growth in his 24 years on the board. He also touched on his favorite argument of the site being zoned for mining. He made this same case in 2010.

Supervisor Kristin Gaspar: "We are working under some tricky conditions." The argument being that we have not built enough housing, "vicious cycle, always behind." She said every housing project is met with protest/litigation. "We need some relief."

Supervisor Greg Cox: "Whether this project is built or not, traffic is going to be a problem." He then asked about fire safety and was told by Tony Mecham Cal Fire Chief that because the project will have clustered houses it will take less resources to fight fires. "They have done as much as they can."

https://www.sandiegoreader.com/users/... https://www.sandiegoreader.com/users/...

Supervisor Ron Roberts: "We heard a lot of conflicting testimony." He said this project is different than when it was heard it before (Merriam Mountains). "We are lacking in housing period." He said we aren't building enough housing and taking thousands of units out of use because of Airbnb. "People who work here and are making decent incomes and they can't find housing." "Every time we talk about housing, we have this same battle." He touched on NIMBYISM without saying the word. He said many of the communities we have now weren't even a thought at one time. "We need housing . . . it overshadows everything."

ABSENT:

Supervisor Dianne Jacob was out (her husband died over the weekend).

0

Julie Stalmer Sept. 26, 2018 @ 6:09 p.m.

Statement from Tiffany Yap of the Center for Biological Diversity after the hearing:

“The board’s approval of Newland Sierra sets the stage for the destruction of over a thousand acres of pristine wildlife habitat. This ill-conceived development will evict imperiled animals, level a beautiful hillside and create more sprawl in a region already struggling with smog and traffic. Destroying a beautiful wild place to put people far from their jobs and at risk of wildfire is not the solution to the housing challenges facing San Diego County.”

0

AlexClarke Sept. 27, 2018 @ 7:27 a.m.

The building restrictions and the cost of housing in San Diego (City/County) built Temecula. You can't be much farther away from your San Diego job than Temecula. San Diego has no affordable housing. Affordable housing is defined as 80% of market. Market rate for housing in San Diego is such the most working by the hour, also known as the middle class or working class, can not afford either market rate or "affordable" rate. Many employers think that $12 an hour is good pay. The problem is twofold: 1. Housing is too expensive and 2: Wages are too low. The Newland Sierra development is not affordable for the working/middle class.

0

Julie Stalmer Sept. 27, 2018 @ 9:30 a.m.

There are many factors and you name a huge one, wages for the average worker in San Diego don't keep up with the cost of living in San Diego.

As far as the housing being affordable at Newland Sierra. This is an exchange at June's planning commission hearing that was interesting (about not requiring Newland Sierra to have affordable housing):

There was a lot of back and forth between planning commissioner Michael Beck and county staff about how they interpreted policy he took as straightforward. When it came to county staff answering his questions, there was often a lot of preamble before getting to the answer and even then, further clarification was sometimes needed.

One example is when Beck pointed to 2-1/2 lines (H-1.9) in the general plan that requires developers requesting a general plan amendment for large-scale residential projects to provide affordable housing. County staff said it wasn't "legally feasible" to either require affordable housing or in-lieu fees because the county doesn't have an ordinance. Assembly Bill 1505 took effect in January 2018 making it easier for cities and counties to establish inclusionary housing requirements via ordinance if they want.

H-1.9: https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/pds/generalplan.html

1505: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180AB1505

Beck expressed his frustration several times at language in the general plan he saw as straightforward that "the public thought meant something" and was being ignored because the county said "those words are not as clear as they seem to be."

1

Julie Stalmer Oct. 11, 2018 @ 5:20 p.m.

"No on Newland Sierra" petition gatherers were out in force today.

0

Julie Stalmer Oct. 18, 2018 @ 11:20 a.m.

None

The opposition got 110,000 signatures. When the signatures are vetted, the board of supervisors will vote to rescind the project or put it to voters in 2020. More to come.

1

Sign in to comment

Let’s Be Friends

Subscribe for local event alerts, concerts tickets, promotions and more from the San Diego Reader

Close