4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs

Disposal of nuclear waste: think Camp Pendleton

Each state should manage its own spent fuel, says study lauded by experts

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station

Ray Lutz of Citizens' Oversight has published a new study suggesting that nuclear waste should possibly be disposed of locally, with each state responsible for its own spent fuel. Lutz says moving the waste long distances can be a difficult problem. Also, the study stresses that the waste be buried in double-layer canisters, not single-layer ones.

Ray Lutz

The study, "A New Strategy: Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel Waste," states, "'Local' implies that the waste will likely be moved from the on-site situation but not moved all the way across the country. There is a fairness to the idea that each state should be responsible for [its] own waste in a suitable location."

Southern California Edison has plans to bury spent nuclear fuel from the now-closed San Onofre plant to spots only 100 feet from the ocean. Many think that is crazy. Edison has agreed to consider moving the waste elsewhere, although it says it is "practicing" going ahead with the original plan to put it near the ocean.

An August agreement calls for all parties to investigate possible distant sites, including Palo Verde in Arizona (part-owned by Edison) and a location in New Mexico. Lutz points out that the agreement does not ban any other site — hence, a site in California could work, but there would be problems.

 William and Rosemarie Alley

San Diegans William and Rosemarie Alley, authors of Too Hot to Touch, a book on the problems of burying radioactive waste, praise Lutz's new study. The Alleys, who concentrate on transportation problems, would like to see San Onofre waste moved a short distance to Camp Pendleton, although that would require many steps, including getting the military's permission.

"There is a mesa at Camp Pendleton, a perfect place for moving the waste," says Rosemarie Alley. Lutz says that a move to Pendleton would be permissible under the August agreement.

Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all

Previous article

31 thousand lawsuits pile up in Tijuana

Shamanata goes to Mexico City after her kids
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station

Ray Lutz of Citizens' Oversight has published a new study suggesting that nuclear waste should possibly be disposed of locally, with each state responsible for its own spent fuel. Lutz says moving the waste long distances can be a difficult problem. Also, the study stresses that the waste be buried in double-layer canisters, not single-layer ones.

Ray Lutz

The study, "A New Strategy: Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel Waste," states, "'Local' implies that the waste will likely be moved from the on-site situation but not moved all the way across the country. There is a fairness to the idea that each state should be responsible for [its] own waste in a suitable location."

Southern California Edison has plans to bury spent nuclear fuel from the now-closed San Onofre plant to spots only 100 feet from the ocean. Many think that is crazy. Edison has agreed to consider moving the waste elsewhere, although it says it is "practicing" going ahead with the original plan to put it near the ocean.

An August agreement calls for all parties to investigate possible distant sites, including Palo Verde in Arizona (part-owned by Edison) and a location in New Mexico. Lutz points out that the agreement does not ban any other site — hence, a site in California could work, but there would be problems.

 William and Rosemarie Alley

San Diegans William and Rosemarie Alley, authors of Too Hot to Touch, a book on the problems of burying radioactive waste, praise Lutz's new study. The Alleys, who concentrate on transportation problems, would like to see San Onofre waste moved a short distance to Camp Pendleton, although that would require many steps, including getting the military's permission.

"There is a mesa at Camp Pendleton, a perfect place for moving the waste," says Rosemarie Alley. Lutz says that a move to Pendleton would be permissible under the August agreement.

Sponsored
Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all
Previous article

Thanksgiving Day Dining Cruise, Dua Lipa: Studio 2054 Livestream, Soft Kill: Dead Kids, R.i.p City

Events November 26-November 28, 2020
Next Article

The two Harumamas

Cute bao maker spins off second Carlsbad location
Comments
11

That is a very bad/crazy idea storing nuclear waste on Camp Pendleton near the ocean. It could contaminate the water, air, soil etc..

Nov. 10, 2017

SportsFan0000: Many agree with that Pendleton is a bad/crazy idea. But many say that trying to move it a long distance -- say, to Arizona -- is crazy, too, because other states won't permit it. Best, Don Bauder

Nov. 10, 2017

Looking for simple answers to this matter is tempting, but will not get it solved. Actually, the current situation cannot be "solved" at all. Containing it is the best you can hope for. That spent fuel/waste will be highly radioactive and dangerous for 100,000 years and beyond. Because of that, it is impossible for humans at our current stage of development to store such stuff in a way that cannot possibly cause degradation.

The plan for Yucca Mountain in Nevada is fairly well developed. Is it the perfect spot for storing this radioactive mess? No, it is not. But I've not heard or seen anything about a better spot. Part of the plan was to construct many, many miles of a brand-new railroad into Yucca mountain that would avoid hauling through Las Vegas and other population centers, although I have a hard time imagining why shipping it is such a dangerous proposition. Before that plan can go forward, a big dose of political will is needed, and the affected states cannot be allowed to block it.

State-by-state storage locations would be, at best, temporary storage sites. When/if some better place to stash the radioactive waste can be found, or some other means of disposal, then it could be moved out of those locations. Whatever we do with it, we are kicking the can down the road, and leaving it to future generations to deal with.

Nov. 10, 2017

Visduh: San Diegan William Alley, co-author with his wife Rosemarie of the book "Too Hot to Touch," worked in a key position at Yucca for quite awhile. He is convinced it won't work. Ray Lutz is not bullish on Yucca, either. The idea of storing the radioactive fuel where it was produced -- a government-favored solution -- is OK for some plants in the U.S., but is disastrous for San Onofre. Burying spent fuel 100 feet from the ocean, in casks that won't last, is insane.

The Alleys believe that Arizona and New Mexico will nix putting the waste in their states.What's so worrisome is that this is the kind of problem that current and future leaders will just put off for later generations -- and then one day it will be too late. Best, Don Bauder

Nov. 10, 2017

Visduh has some valid thoughts. I like Yucca mountain best of current ideas.

But I have a question: How dangerous is this stuff? We have seen plants, animals and humans survive intense exposure without serious consequences. There have been deaths among Chernobyl workers, but others were not seriously damaged. If a trainload of packaged waste passed through Las Vegas, would they have to decontaminate the city? I understand the concern about a train wreck in the center of the city; is this likely? What would be the greatest negative outcome if that happened?

Regarding Chernobyl: "Ivanov et al. (2001) [8] studied nearly 66,000 liquidators from Russia, and found no increase in overall mortality from cancer or non-cancer causes..." - a typical conclusion from this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_liquidators

Perhaps it is the political outcome that weighs heaviest in the minds of decision makers. A population of paranoid, brainwashed people would react negatively to any decision that put them at the slightest risk.

Nov. 10, 2017

@Swell: You are not correct, and have been very selective in citing information from that Wikipedia entry! For example, you purposely left out the next sentence pertaining to that study: "However, a statistically significant dose-related excess mortality risk was found for both cancer and heart disease." Granted, this is hard to study due to lack of accurate data. However, the "typical conclusion" (your words) from the Wikipedia article is actually that there were likely thousands of premature deaths from Chernobyl. It seems you have an ulterior motive to prove your belief that environmentalists are "paranoid" and "brainwashed"...

Nov. 11, 2017

DonFlow:"A statistically significant dose-related excess mortality risk was found for both cancer and heart disease." That seems meaningful to me. Best, Don Bauder

Nov. 11, 2017

swell: You raise a good question. Just how dangerous is radioactive waste? It takes a long time for some effects of radiation to show up. I was surprised that Fukushima didn't seem to create as much of a health problem as many expected. However, again, these problems may show up much later. Best, Don Bauder

Nov. 10, 2017

I was around when SONGS was built. Nuclear power was touted as cheap and safe. It seems to me that nuclear power will turn out to be the most expensive power per Kwh ever produced. This is proof that those with money and power can sell anything to the public.

Nov. 13, 2017

AlexClarke: There is no doubt that in the 1960s and 1970s, nuclear power was considered the answer to utilities' air pollution. But people didn't consider the problems, and the magnitude of the problems, of disposing of spent nuclear fuel. We even elected a nuclear engineer, Jimmy Carter, as president. Best, Don Bauder

Nov. 16, 2017

don bauder, Actually, Pres. Carter was not a nuclear engineer. He was chosen for the nuclear submarine program in 1952, later being assigned to Schenectady, New York in March of 1953, where he took graduate work at Union College in reactor technology and nuclear physics. However, after his father died, he resigned his naval commission and he was honorably discharged from the Navy in late 1953. Not to worry though. I always thought the same thing, until I read his biography

Nov. 16, 2017

Sign in to comment

Sign in

Art Reviews — W.S. Di Piero's eye on exhibits Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed Best Buys — San Diego shopping Big Screen — Movie commentary Blurt — Music's inside track Booze News — San Diego spirits City Lights — News and politics Classical Music — Immortal beauty Classifieds — Free and easy Cover Stories — Front-page features Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts Famous Former Neighbors — Next-door celebs Feast! — Food & drink reviews Feature Stories — Local news & stories From the Archives — Spotlight on the past Golden Dreams — Talk of the town Here's the Deal — Chad Deal's watering holes Just Announced — The scoop on shows Letters — Our inbox [email protected] — Local movie buffs share favorites Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news News Ticker — News & politics Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated Of Note — Concert picks Out & About — What's Happening Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated Poetry — The old and the new Pour Over — Grab a cup Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers Reading — The hunt for intellectuals Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds SD on the QT — Almost factual news Set 'em Up Joe — Bartenders' drink recipes Sheep and Goats — Places of worship Special Issues — The best of Sports — Athletics without gush Street Style — San Diego streets have style Suit Up — Fashion tips for dudes Theater Reviews — Local productions Theater antireviews — Narrow your search Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads Waterfront — All things ocean Your Week — Daily event picks
4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs
Close