When San Diego Republican mayor Kevin Faulconer ascended to power three years ago, he promised to clean up the mess left by fallen Democrat Bob Filner, but city hall traditions die hard, including loose handling of the city's electronic credit card accounts, based on a new report by city auditor Eduardo Luna.
In the week before Filner took off on a Paris junket in June 2013, emails later uncovered by the Union-Tribune revealed, city procurement officials quietly raised the spending limits of so-called purchasing cards, also known as P-Cards, used to transfer funds to cover official expenses.
"Please increase my p-card transaction limit and month limit this month to $30,000 so that I am able to purchase airfare for the Mayor [some words redacted] for an international trip planned for next week,” wrote Rimah Khouri, acting deputy director in the city’s Human Resources Department to p-card administrator Dianne Owalla, according to the U-T's July 2013 account.
"No city officials returned calls to explain why the increase was needed, or how much was actually spent," the story added.
Now comes auditor Luna with word via the city's anonymous Fraud Hotline that certain unnamed, highly ranked city officials have been playing fast and loose with the electronic payment system during Faucolner's reign.
"The Office of the City Auditor received an anonymous Fraud Hotline report alleging that a Department of Information Technology manager intentionally overrode Procurement Card policies and internal controls," says Luna's March 28 report to assistant chief operating officer Stacey LoMedico.
"During the course of our investigation, we determined that the named manager, and two other senior managers had violated P-Card internal controls."
Noted Luna, "Our investigation determined that the poor oversight of P-Card use has been ongoing for the last year and was reported to have been an issue for much longer."
The auditor found that "one manager intentionally overrode P-Card internal controls regarding split transactions, after being specifically advised not to use the P-Card to make the purchase in question by the City’s P-Card Administrator."
According to the report, "a split transaction involves breaking up a high-dollar purchase into smaller transactions in order to circumvent the internal controls limiting the maximum dollar amount for a single transaction. The practice of splitting transactions is 'strictly prohibited and viewed as a serious infraction.'"
Making things worse, "A second manager was found to have been in possession of the P-Card assigned to a subordinate...When we asked the manager about inappropriate use of the P-Card in question, the manager did not disclose their own inappropriate use."
Auditors also found that "a third manager was not honest and forthcoming regarding the misuse of the manager’s assigned P-Card, and did not reveal prior internal control and policy violations that we had confirmed through independent sources and documents.”
Says the document, “we identified over $8,000 in charges made on the P-Card issued to the manager on a day when the manager was out of the office."
Concludes the report, "While we did not identify fraudulent transactions such as personal purchases, our findings are especially concerning given the Department of Information Technology’s responsibility for the City’s information technology security, and the specific involvement by managers who have a significant role in the City’s internal controls."
The audit's recommendation that "the Assistant Chief Operating Officer take the appropriate corrective action with respect to the employees identified in the confidential report" was agreed to by the Faulconer hands, with a target implementation date of May 1.
When San Diego Republican mayor Kevin Faulconer ascended to power three years ago, he promised to clean up the mess left by fallen Democrat Bob Filner, but city hall traditions die hard, including loose handling of the city's electronic credit card accounts, based on a new report by city auditor Eduardo Luna.
In the week before Filner took off on a Paris junket in June 2013, emails later uncovered by the Union-Tribune revealed, city procurement officials quietly raised the spending limits of so-called purchasing cards, also known as P-Cards, used to transfer funds to cover official expenses.
"Please increase my p-card transaction limit and month limit this month to $30,000 so that I am able to purchase airfare for the Mayor [some words redacted] for an international trip planned for next week,” wrote Rimah Khouri, acting deputy director in the city’s Human Resources Department to p-card administrator Dianne Owalla, according to the U-T's July 2013 account.
"No city officials returned calls to explain why the increase was needed, or how much was actually spent," the story added.
Now comes auditor Luna with word via the city's anonymous Fraud Hotline that certain unnamed, highly ranked city officials have been playing fast and loose with the electronic payment system during Faucolner's reign.
"The Office of the City Auditor received an anonymous Fraud Hotline report alleging that a Department of Information Technology manager intentionally overrode Procurement Card policies and internal controls," says Luna's March 28 report to assistant chief operating officer Stacey LoMedico.
"During the course of our investigation, we determined that the named manager, and two other senior managers had violated P-Card internal controls."
Noted Luna, "Our investigation determined that the poor oversight of P-Card use has been ongoing for the last year and was reported to have been an issue for much longer."
The auditor found that "one manager intentionally overrode P-Card internal controls regarding split transactions, after being specifically advised not to use the P-Card to make the purchase in question by the City’s P-Card Administrator."
According to the report, "a split transaction involves breaking up a high-dollar purchase into smaller transactions in order to circumvent the internal controls limiting the maximum dollar amount for a single transaction. The practice of splitting transactions is 'strictly prohibited and viewed as a serious infraction.'"
Making things worse, "A second manager was found to have been in possession of the P-Card assigned to a subordinate...When we asked the manager about inappropriate use of the P-Card in question, the manager did not disclose their own inappropriate use."
Auditors also found that "a third manager was not honest and forthcoming regarding the misuse of the manager’s assigned P-Card, and did not reveal prior internal control and policy violations that we had confirmed through independent sources and documents.”
Says the document, “we identified over $8,000 in charges made on the P-Card issued to the manager on a day when the manager was out of the office."
Concludes the report, "While we did not identify fraudulent transactions such as personal purchases, our findings are especially concerning given the Department of Information Technology’s responsibility for the City’s information technology security, and the specific involvement by managers who have a significant role in the City’s internal controls."
The audit's recommendation that "the Assistant Chief Operating Officer take the appropriate corrective action with respect to the employees identified in the confidential report" was agreed to by the Faulconer hands, with a target implementation date of May 1.
Comments
Where I work, there are very strict controls on purchasing things. In the past, there has been abuse, or the appearance of abuse. But it's gotten to the point that they pay far more to try to prevent abuse than they'd lose to abuse! If you buy anything on a credit card, there's a $750 charge to pay for the procurement machine. Result: if you're buying ANYTHING, you load up the purchase to as close to the max allowable charge as you can. An actual acquisition incurs far higher fees and leaves you asking for X, but then the procurement people "put it out for bid" even though they have no idea what you're actually getting. Sometimes, after all the money and waiting, what you get isn't what you expected at all and winds up excessed.
It's much cheaper to accept that sometimes people will do bad things, and when you find them you fire them and charge them with a crime.
Is there any campaign promise that was made by Kev-boy that he's actually kept? He'll go down in city history as the "all talk, no walk" mayor who actually did nothing to alter the status quo in a positive direction. All the talk about infrastructure upgrades (e.g. fixing the crumbling streets) has come to naught; those things are worse now than when he took office.
Remember the bumper sticker : "I had lunch with Uvaldo" If you do then you have been around a while and thus can see that nothing has changed.
Never saw those, but I remember the WIN (Whip Inflation Now) buttons. Yeah, that sure worked, right?
Just like the War on Drugs.