• Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

Members of the San Ysidro teacher’s union held signs, “SYSD Needs Velasquez” at the district offices on Tuesday, January 27. Supporters were there before the San Ysidro Elementary School District board voted 3-2 to hire Edward Velasquez as the district’s new interim superintendent.

George Cameron resigned on January 12th under pressure from newly elected trustee Rudolfo Linares, who in December called for Cameron to step down based on an incident that involved "the disappearance of a number of musical instruments owned by the district."

The board meeting agenda for December 11, 2014, shows that Linares and newly elected Marcos Diaz attended the 2014 CSBA Annual Education Conference and Trade Show in San Francisco from December 14 to 16 for a total cost to the district of $4500. Linares said that he met Mr. Velasquez at the conference and began to tell him about San Ysidro’s troubles.

Martin Galante, member of the San Ysidro Education Association (SYEA) and a kindergarten teacher at Willow Elementary, explained that the board then brought the teachers' union into the process of hiring a new interim superintendent.

Speaking about the choice of Velasquez, Galante said, “He was brought, I believe, to Mr. Linares’s attention. They interviewed him. They approved him. They contacted us. We met with him for two hours at the union offices.”

Trustees held a special meeting on January 22 to interview two candidates: Dianna Carberry, a former principal of Orange Glen High School; and Velasquez, a retired superintendent from Montebello Unified School District. Both had been named in lawsuits involving their districts in the past.

Zenaid Rosario, a dual-language kindergarten teacher at Smythe Elementary, asked the board that a decision not be made so quickly. “It has come to the attention of many in this community that there is a shadow of concern over the head of the person you want to recommend for employment in this position. And though they may just be allegations or false accusations, we don’t need that kind of attention.”

Carol Wallace, president of the San Ysidro Education Association, also told the board that the teachers’ union sat down with Velasquez several Saturdays ago.

“He basically told us his life: about joining the police force, being a guitar player, and he also mentioned the lawsuit. First of all, there’s no ongoing investigation with this lawsuit. This lawsuit happened over four years ago and the case was dismissed with prejudice. That means it cannot be opened again. So, he does not have to deal with any legal issues as far as the Montebello case is concerned. This case was filed by a disgruntled employee.”

After the motion passed, with José Barajas and Luciana Corrales voting “no,” Barajas commented, “I feel that there was really no need for an interim at this time…. This will be our fourth superintendent in two years.”

Velasquez’s contract starts on February 2. His salary will be $15,000 per month.

After the decision, Galante commented, “Really, we need someone to get us out of negative certification and he’s the only person that can do it. The last district he was in, two months and they were out.”

  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it


Visduh Jan. 31, 2015 @ 8:48 a.m.

While I know nothing about Velasquez other than what is in this post, I do know about Carberry. Her tenure as principal at Orange Glen was not a good one, and the lawsuit pointed out some troubling activity. Then she fled to southern Riverside County, as I remember, to get away from the stinky situation she had created in Escondido. We can now presume that she's retired now, and I say she needs to stay retired permanently.


anniej Feb. 1, 2015 @ 7:46 a.m.

After reading the 'allegations' on several websites including EGPN News I am raising the yellow cautionary flag.

WHEN WILL SCHOOL DISTRICTS LEARN IT IS IMPORTANT TO THOROUGHLY VET HIRES - especially a District like San Ysidro who has had major problems with the integrity of their Sup? UNBELIEVABLE, SIMPLY UNBELIEVABLE!!!!


Barbara Zaragoza Feb. 7, 2015 @ 4:04 p.m.

I ended up downloading large portions of the lawsuit. It's a shame that "anyone can sue anyone for anything" and the complaint can be public record, but the deposition under oath is marked confidential.

What I can glean is that the complaint -- whose contents mostly can't be printed because they are rather pornographic -- also become what might appear to be somewhat delusional at some point? The plaintiff claimed that Superintendent Velasquez-while at district offices and in the capacity of a Superintendent--needed to finish dressing into his uniform as the Police Chief of the District. He asked the plaintiff to pin the badge on his uniform.

The defense requested discovered documents, tangible things and verification (that is, requests for emails, photographs or any documents that might prove the allegations). On May 12, 2011, the plaintiff responded to most of the twenty-four requests with objections “on the grounds that this request is overly broad, unduly burdensome and therefore irrelevant.”

On May 25, 2011 a ruling granted Velasquez’s request to see the full medical records. That same ruling granted Velasquez’s request for sanctions in the amount of $525.00 and $1,137.50 because the plaintiff failed to respond to defense attorney requests for supplemental and discovered documents.

The case never went to trial. Instead, the plaintiff asked to dismiss in November 2011 with prejudice (meaning, he cannot bring the lawsuit to court again) and the plaintiff recovered zero dollars.


Sign in to comment