I'm not sure how many of you attended the Summitt last night at Sweetwater High School. I did and here is some of what I heard.

Five major topics were discussed by the district. The first was the Compact for Success. The district reported a 578% increase in college ready students over a ten year period of 2000 - 2010, or more than 5000 students.

The second item discussed were the IPads. There are currently 6000 Ipads with an additional 8000 anticipated next year. They were funded with Mello Mello Roos and Proposition O monies. They used a proportionate share from the Mello Roos fund (25%) which is equal to rhe number of students that live in Mello Roos areas. The district anticipates having to upgrade their wireless infrastructure as the number of users increases over the next few years.

The third item discussed was the budget for 2012-2013. This is the 5th straight year of cuts to education in California. The total budget for this year is $339 million. Salaries and benefits account for 80% of the budget. It costs the district $7700 to educate each student, but they are reimbursed only $5800 by the state. They have anticipated total expenditures at $331 million. The district also indicated that state aid represents 52% of their cashflow, and because the timing of how the state pays them, they have a cash flow problem. As a result, they have resorted to borrowing money from the Mello Roos fund to make up the cash flow shortgage. However, they do repay this fund as required by law. They are not borrowing from Prop O or the state matching funds as the Trustees gave the district a directive not to.

The district also discussed the Mello Roos in a bit more detail. There are 17 Community Facilities Districts, and Mello Roos from these districts can be used for school facilities, students, personal property, modernization and technology. So it was okay to use this fund for the IPads.

The district told us they had declining enrollment over the last 3 years, so they implemented various initiatives to stop this. As a result, enrollment is up by 650 students this year.

The fourth item discussed was facilities, which includes transportation and maintenance. There are 100 buses which provide 8800 student rides per day. The district services a 100 square mile area, and cut 10% or $800,000 out of the budget. Walking distances were increased to 2.5 miles for middle schools and 3.5 miles for high schools. There are now only 200 students on the waiting list.

As far as maintenance, the district has spent $287 million in Proposition O projects.

The fifth and final item was the high school/middle school redesign. This will make all district students college and career ready by the time they graduate. Each middle and high school will have a pathway program on campus. The key focus areas are health care, construction, IT, engineering and business.

So that is a summary of what i heard. If you were there, what did you hear?


anniej Sept. 23, 2012 @ 9:23 p.m.

bvagency: IF this information would have been shared by an identity other than suhsd i would trust what was being said. unfortunately it has gotten so bad that the community trusts little if anything that is told to us. yes, i know sad that i feel this way. but you know what they say the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior and i am reminded how many times the truth has consistently been kept from us. recent case in point, brands resignation which he turned in mid july yet we did not learn of it until he gave 2 interviews, one to star news and one to ut.

compact for success data - i would like to see the graduation data from state. professors at state seem to have a different view point regarding the number of 'college ready' students suhsd is sending them. bit of a conflict

the mello roos financing of ipads, interesting that this statement was made to the public as dr. brand seemed to have a different answer when questioned a few months ago at a board meeting. according to him the discrepancy was due to the students who live in mello roos areas transferring to west side schools. bit of a conflict

enrollment is up by 650 students, hmmmmm, not according to the schools - with the exception of few on the east side which have been inundated to do brand removing home school boundaries (WITHOUT A BOARD VOTE) enrollment is DOWN i am told. this is another situation in which brand appears to have stated something different at a board meeting.

high school/middle school redesign - many within the district are sending out the alert - the changes are going to result in disaster since the district has failed to provide the means necessary to obtain the results they are looking for.

mello funds being paid back on time. ah yes, we were told the same thing regarding prop o - then the auditor disclosed in their audit that the district had 'forgotten' to pay back borrowed monies - old news? yes - but again past behavior future predictor?

prop o project - we are still reeling from what the pay to play upcoming trial has revealed.

too bad the public was not encouraged to ask questions. feed back from last years indicated the community wanted interaction.

the only area in my life in which i am this negative is suhsd. and for the record i want to change the way i view my school district. if anyone would have told me 4 years ago that my school district was riddled with such problems i would have found it hard to believe.

hopefully tomorrow night will begin to change my view of the board and the future of our district - yes, i am full of hope - and am looking towards a brighter future under the leadership of a new superintendent.


Sign in to comment

Let’s Be Friends

Subscribe for local event alerts, concerts tickets, promotions and more from the San Diego Reader