Anchor ads are not supported on this page.

4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs

City Attorney's Office responds to sexual harassment lawsuit on Filner's behalf

Denies any wrongdoing and says Irene McCormack Jackson only exacerbated the problem.

Just four days removed from office, former Mayor Bob Filner and City Attorney Jan Goldsmith had crafted their response to claims set against him by former communications director, Irene McCormack Jackson.

On July 22, McCormack Jackson appeared before a crowded room of journalists alongside famed attorney Gloria Allred to announce that she was suing the then mayor for sexual harassment. She claimed that her boss made inappropriate comments -- read: sans-panties -- and unwarranted advances on her during work.

On September 3 Filner and his new set of lawyers -- read:City Attorney Jan Goldsmith's Office -- answered the allegations, more like, blatantly denied them having ever occurred.

Those answers appear in a court document filed with the Superior Court on September 3 and posted today on September 11.

The document is short and to the point and suggests that Filner did nothing wrong. The answer claims that it was actually McCormack Jackson who was the one to make matters worse by filing the lawsuit and going public with her allegations.

Here is the answer in it's entirety:

Defendant Bob Filner ("Defendant") hereby provides the following answer to Plaintiff Irene McCormack Jackson's ("Plaintiff') unverified Complaint on file herein as follows: Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 431.30(d), Defendant generally denies each and every allegation of the Complaint. Also, as separate, distinct, and affirmative defenses to the allegations in the Complaint, Defendant alleges as follows:

The facts alleged in the Complaint, and each cause of action therein, fail to state a cause of action against Defendant.

Plaintiff cannot establish a prima facie case of sexual harassment under the Fair Employment and Housing Act or Title VII.

Plaintiff was not subjected to unwelcome, harassing conduct by Defendant based on her gender or sex.

The harassing conduct alleged by Plaintiff was not sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of Plaintiffs employment at the City and create a hostile or abusive work environment on the basis of sex.

Plaintiffs work environment at the City was not objectively and subjectively hostile or abusive on the basis of sex.

Defendant had legitimate, nondiscriminatory, non-retaliatory reasons for his acts and/or omissions in regard to Plaintiff.

Defendant acted in good faith, without malice, and with a reasonable belief that his conduct was lawful, welcome, and/or consensual at all relevant times.

Defendant's act and/or omissions with respect to Plaintiff were without any harassing, discriminatory, or retaliatory intent, purpose, or motive.

Defendant's conduct in connection with all matters alleged in the Complaint was reasonable, lawful, and consistent with community standards; Plaintiff's conduct was unreasonable.

Plaintiff unreasonably failed to use the preventive and corrective measures that the City of San Diego provided; such use would have prevented some or all of Plaintiff's harm, if any.

Plaintiff failed to avail herself of the protections offered by the City of San Diego; Plaintiff failed to utilize and exhaust the City of San Diego's internal grievance and/or complaint procedures and remedies.

Plaintiff failed to comply with the claims presentation requirements and the requirements pertaining to commencement of civil actions against Defendant, a City employee, as set forth in the Government Code.

Plaintiff is barred from recovery by non-compliance with the Government Code, in that the allegations in Plaintiffs Complaint herein were not described in any Government Claims Act claim Plaintiff timely filed with the City of San Diego.

Plaintiff is barred from recovery by non-compliance with the Government Code, in that the allegations in Plaintiff's Complaint herein were not described in any charge Plaintiff timely filed with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing.

Plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies prior to bringing suit.

Plaintiff failed to pursue and exhaust her judicial remedies.

Plaintiff's claims, or some of them, are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations.

Plaintiff's claims, or some of them, are barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel.

Plaintiff's claims, or some of them, are barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

Plaintiff's claims, or some of them, are barred by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act.

Plaintiffs claims are barred by the doctrine of unclean hands.

Plaintiff's claims are barred by the doctrine of laches.

Plaintiff has waived some or all of her claims.

Plaintiff has released some or all of her claims.

Defendant is immune from liability, in whole or in part, by virtue of the statutory immunities set forth in the Government Claims Act, including, but not limited to, Government Code sections 820, 820.2, 820.4, 820.6, 820.8, 820.9, 821, 821.6, and 822.2.

Plaintiff has not sustained injury or damage due to any act or omission of Defendant.

Plaintiffs injury and/or damage, if any, was proximately and substantially caused or contributed to, in whole or in part, by Plaintiff and/or third parties.

Plaintiff has failed to mitigate her injuries or damages, if any.

Plaintiff's conduct has exacerbated her injuries or damages, if any.

Plaintiff cannot establish through clear and convincing evidence that Defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice, so as to allow Plaintiff to recover punitive or exemplary damages against Defendant.

WHEREFORE, Defendant prays as follows: 1. That Plaintiff takes nothing by way of her action; 2. That Defendant be dismissed and awarded his costs of suit; and 3. That Defendant be awarded such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all

Previous article

A history of the house on the hill at Ivanhoe Ranch

From Apolinaria Lorenzana to Jane Goodall

Just four days removed from office, former Mayor Bob Filner and City Attorney Jan Goldsmith had crafted their response to claims set against him by former communications director, Irene McCormack Jackson.

On July 22, McCormack Jackson appeared before a crowded room of journalists alongside famed attorney Gloria Allred to announce that she was suing the then mayor for sexual harassment. She claimed that her boss made inappropriate comments -- read: sans-panties -- and unwarranted advances on her during work.

On September 3 Filner and his new set of lawyers -- read:City Attorney Jan Goldsmith's Office -- answered the allegations, more like, blatantly denied them having ever occurred.

Those answers appear in a court document filed with the Superior Court on September 3 and posted today on September 11.

The document is short and to the point and suggests that Filner did nothing wrong. The answer claims that it was actually McCormack Jackson who was the one to make matters worse by filing the lawsuit and going public with her allegations.

Here is the answer in it's entirety:

Defendant Bob Filner ("Defendant") hereby provides the following answer to Plaintiff Irene McCormack Jackson's ("Plaintiff') unverified Complaint on file herein as follows: Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 431.30(d), Defendant generally denies each and every allegation of the Complaint. Also, as separate, distinct, and affirmative defenses to the allegations in the Complaint, Defendant alleges as follows:

The facts alleged in the Complaint, and each cause of action therein, fail to state a cause of action against Defendant.

Plaintiff cannot establish a prima facie case of sexual harassment under the Fair Employment and Housing Act or Title VII.

Plaintiff was not subjected to unwelcome, harassing conduct by Defendant based on her gender or sex.

The harassing conduct alleged by Plaintiff was not sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of Plaintiffs employment at the City and create a hostile or abusive work environment on the basis of sex.

Plaintiffs work environment at the City was not objectively and subjectively hostile or abusive on the basis of sex.

Defendant had legitimate, nondiscriminatory, non-retaliatory reasons for his acts and/or omissions in regard to Plaintiff.

Defendant acted in good faith, without malice, and with a reasonable belief that his conduct was lawful, welcome, and/or consensual at all relevant times.

Defendant's act and/or omissions with respect to Plaintiff were without any harassing, discriminatory, or retaliatory intent, purpose, or motive.

Defendant's conduct in connection with all matters alleged in the Complaint was reasonable, lawful, and consistent with community standards; Plaintiff's conduct was unreasonable.

Plaintiff unreasonably failed to use the preventive and corrective measures that the City of San Diego provided; such use would have prevented some or all of Plaintiff's harm, if any.

Plaintiff failed to avail herself of the protections offered by the City of San Diego; Plaintiff failed to utilize and exhaust the City of San Diego's internal grievance and/or complaint procedures and remedies.

Plaintiff failed to comply with the claims presentation requirements and the requirements pertaining to commencement of civil actions against Defendant, a City employee, as set forth in the Government Code.

Plaintiff is barred from recovery by non-compliance with the Government Code, in that the allegations in Plaintiffs Complaint herein were not described in any Government Claims Act claim Plaintiff timely filed with the City of San Diego.

Plaintiff is barred from recovery by non-compliance with the Government Code, in that the allegations in Plaintiff's Complaint herein were not described in any charge Plaintiff timely filed with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing.

Plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies prior to bringing suit.

Plaintiff failed to pursue and exhaust her judicial remedies.

Plaintiff's claims, or some of them, are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations.

Plaintiff's claims, or some of them, are barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel.

Plaintiff's claims, or some of them, are barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

Plaintiff's claims, or some of them, are barred by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act.

Plaintiffs claims are barred by the doctrine of unclean hands.

Plaintiff's claims are barred by the doctrine of laches.

Plaintiff has waived some or all of her claims.

Plaintiff has released some or all of her claims.

Defendant is immune from liability, in whole or in part, by virtue of the statutory immunities set forth in the Government Claims Act, including, but not limited to, Government Code sections 820, 820.2, 820.4, 820.6, 820.8, 820.9, 821, 821.6, and 822.2.

Plaintiff has not sustained injury or damage due to any act or omission of Defendant.

Plaintiffs injury and/or damage, if any, was proximately and substantially caused or contributed to, in whole or in part, by Plaintiff and/or third parties.

Plaintiff has failed to mitigate her injuries or damages, if any.

Plaintiff's conduct has exacerbated her injuries or damages, if any.

Plaintiff cannot establish through clear and convincing evidence that Defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice, so as to allow Plaintiff to recover punitive or exemplary damages against Defendant.

WHEREFORE, Defendant prays as follows: 1. That Plaintiff takes nothing by way of her action; 2. That Defendant be dismissed and awarded his costs of suit; and 3. That Defendant be awarded such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

Sponsored
Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all
Previous article

Former Filner staffer asks for $1.48 million in damages

Irene McCormack Jackson's "emotional distress, pain and suffering" worth $950,000
Next Article

Garbage truckers’ gripes

Lawsuit claims city devised computer program to cheat workers
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed Big Screen — Movie commentary Blurt — Music's inside track Booze News — San Diego spirits Classical Music — Immortal beauty Classifieds — Free and easy Cover Stories — Front-page features Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts Feast! — Food & drink reviews Feature Stories — Local news & stories Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore From the Archives — Spotlight on the past Golden Dreams — Talk of the town The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it Letters — Our inbox Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news News Ticker — News & politics Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated Poetry — The old and the new Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers Reading — The hunt for intellectuals Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds SD on the QT — Almost factual news Sheep and Goats — Places of worship Special Issues — The best of Street Style — San Diego streets have style Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves Theater — On stage in San Diego this week Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads Your Week — Daily event picks
4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs
Close

Anchor ads are not supported on this page.

This Week’s Reader This Week’s Reader