• News Ticker alerts

University of California Regents have approved creation of a vice-chancellorship for Equity, Diversity and Inclusion at UCSD, naming Linda S. Greene to the post at an annual base salary of $250,000, according to closed session documents released after today's meeting in San Francisco.

In addition, Greene will receive "a relocation allowance of 24 percent of base salary ($60,000) to be paid either as a lump sum or in installment payments."

Greene is currently Evjue-Bascom Professor of Law at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, according to that university's website. "Her teaching and academic scholarship are concentrated in the areas of Constitutional Law, Civil Procedure, Legislation, Civil Rights and Sports Law."

"Following graduation from the University of California at Berkeley Law School in 1974, Professor Greene began her career as a civil rights attorney on the staff of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund in New York City."

According to the University of California documents, Greene will not be coming aboard full time at UCSD until early next year.

"When she accepted this offer, Ms. Greene indicated that, because of the lengthy search process, she has already committed to teaching at her current institution this fall and will be unable to begin the new assignment before December 2012," according to the documents.

"The campus anticipates that the fall quarter will be a critical time for this position because of two significant factors: (1) Chancellor Khosla’s introduction to the community affords the occasion to touch key constituent groups and show his commitment to the diversity mission; and (2) the campus is embarking on a strategic planning exercise that would provide an important foundational effort for the work of the campus’ chief diversity officer.

"Although her arrival is delayed, Ms. Green has indicated a willingness to participate in these important activities beginning right after the Regents approve her appointment. Her visibility on campus will go a long way in addressing the campus community’s concerns about the fact that she will not formally assume the position until later."

Other Greene benefits include "a temporary housing allowance not to exceed $13,500 for a period of 90 days to offset limited housing-related expenses"; "100 percent reimbursement of reasonable and allowable expenses associated with moving household goods and personal effects from the former primary residence to the new primary residence"; "two house-hunting trips each for the candidate and her spouse or partner, subject to the limitations under policy"; "Reasonable travel expenses for all business-related visits to the campus during the transition period prior to her start date, which is anticipated to be no later than January 2, 2013"; and "eligibility to participate in the UC Home Loan Program."

The proposed diversity position, which surfaced last year, has drawn criticism from those who contend it is a costly duplication of existing programs.

"Even as UC campuses jettison entire degree programs and lose faculty to competing universities, one fiefdom has remained virtually sacrosanct: the diversity machine," wrote Heather Mac Donald, a contributing editor to City Journal, a magazine published by the conservative Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.

  • News Ticker alerts


SurfPuppy619 Sept. 14, 2012 @ 12:12 a.m.

University of California Regents have approved creation of a vice-chancellorship for Equity, Diversity and Inclusion at UCSD, naming Linda S. Greene to the post at an annual base salary of $250,000, according to closed session documents released after today's meeting in San Francisco. == IDIOTS

Taxes are DOA, and this is the reason.......right here.


ImJustABill Sept. 14, 2012 @ 6:09 a.m.

I think the governement should focus on attempting to provide the best essential services for the least possible expenses. It's pretty hard for me to accept that a tax increase is absolutely necessary when I read about expenditures such as this. This office seems to be more about pushing a certain world-view and political agenda than about providing a vital service to the CA public.

I'm voting no on Prop 30.


Visduh Sept. 14, 2012 @ 8:34 p.m.

The purpose of UCSD is educational and to perform research. It is strong with the latter, and not-so-good with the former. Its students take classes there and graduate, but feel no real connection with the old school after leaving there. It has seemingly attempted to connect with the undergraduates for a long time, yet most of them don't have any sense of connection or loyalty. In response to a very few localized and juvenile incidents on the campus, they now rob the understaffed classrooms of a quarter-million bucks plus and hire a "diversity executive." If I were in her shoes, I'd be happy to take a non-job for that size of salary. What will she do? Guarantee an end to racial/ethnic strife? Easy, there really is none. Or write position papers endlessly that set up committees to consider steps to make sure there is opportunity for all on the campus? Nine chances out of ten, she'll spend her time--until she retires--setting up a system to promote Equity, Diversity and Inclusion at UCSD. And all the while, the atmosphere at UCSD will deteriorate for the students because of understaffing and other forms of waste.


monaghan Sept. 14, 2012 @ 10:24 p.m.

UCSD could have convened a subcommittee of the faculty Senate to pay some attention to "equity, diversity and inclusion and save us the $ 250,000 price tag for this new position. On the other hand, now the Regents literally can call themselves a "job-creator" in this tough economy.

I am voting for Prop 38, Molly Munger's strict tax initiative to benefit K-12 public school kids and their classrooms. No personnel salary raises, required public participation in the spending decisions, a sunset provision and backed by the California PTA. Yes on Prop 38.


SurfPuppy619 Sept. 15, 2012 @ 12:51 a.m.

Prop 30 is DOA and Prop 38 is going to get far less votes than Prop 30. So 38 is DOA too. K-12 get plenty of cash right now. Add in the bond issues that are floated and usually passed every 2 years and over half the taxes in this state goes to K-12, and 80% goes to employee comp.


Sign in to comment

Win a $25 Gift Card to
The Broken Yolk Cafe

Join our newsletter list

Each newsletter subscription means another chance to win!