• News Ticker alerts

Environmental groups have filed suit against a proposed development near the Salton Sea that they say would irreparably harm the environment.

The Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity allege that Travertine Point, a 4,900 acre development that would include up to 16,655 residential units and 5 million square feet of commercial space in a remote location 16 miles from the nearest established town, would dramatically increase vehicle pollution and further damage the already-imperiled Salton Sea.

“Given the project's remote location, project residents - and especially early residents - will be forced to drive long distances for job and basic services. This massive influx of people, and the resulting traffic, will lead to an increase in air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions in a region that already had some of the nation's highest air pollution levels.

"It will also catalyze more growth and cause significant new impacts on nearby parks, biological resources and cultural resources,” says the groups’ complaint, which claims that the project’s approval and allegedly inadequate environmental report violate the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Code of Regulations. They’re asking a judge to order approval of the project to be revoked and new environmental studies to be commissioned.

“It's baffling why they approved the project in light of the economic downturn and the decline in the housing market,” Center lawyer Aruna Prabhala tells the Courthouse News Service.

Paul Quill, the project manager for developer Black Emerald Properties, disagrees with the environmental report assessment, as well as the timing for the project.

He says it’s estimated the population of the area will expand by some 150,000 over the next 30 years, and his project offers a better option for smart growth rather than piecemeal development.

“The opponents claim that the project's environmental impact was not thoroughly studied, but there are around 3,000 pages in the environmental report, excluding the appendices,” says Quill.

“It was a five-year process, and it was revised and recirculated three times. The project was thoroughly vetted on the environment aspect, so we take issue with their assertion that it wasn't.”

Environmentalists respond that despite the revisions, issues brought forth by their groups and government agencies were never fully addressed.

“We also had outside experts come in and analyze the project, and their studies showed that it addresses voluminous clean energy concerns by including sustainable measures like making places within walking distance, having electrical vehicle outlets, and using solar opportunities in residential and commercial areas,” Quill continues, rebutting the claim that the remoteness of the project will increase vehicle traffic and air pollution.

“Overall, they estimated that a person living in the community would reduce their carbon footprint by 38 percent as compared to someone living in a standard area like San Bernardino.”

Erin Chalmers, a lawyer with the Sierra Club, is skeptical of these claims.

“They claim that residents will make 14 percent, or one in seven trips in the community on foot, but this is an area where temperatures are routinely over 100 degrees three to four months a year.

The air quality is horrid, the sea smells disgusting, and there are many military flyovers at very loud decibels,” Chalmers says. “Believing that anyone will willingly walk anywhere in conditions like this is just unrealistic.”

Pictured: Salton Sea shoreline

  • News Ticker alerts


dwbat March 20, 2012 @ 9:59 a.m.

Why would anyone want to live in such a stinky place? I've driven past the Salton Sea and never wanted to stop, even for five minutes. It's basically like a large sewage disposal lake. Here's a better plan: drain that swamp, as it is not worth saving. There are other far-better parcels available around Palm Springs for future development. One correction: courthousenews.com says it is a "4,918-acre project."


Joaquin_de_la_Mesa March 20, 2012 @ 11:06 a.m.

You can't drain a body of water which sits below sea level.


Ruth Newell March 20, 2012 @ 12:27 p.m.

The Salton Sea is gorgeous and serene and far less polluted than coastal waterways, aside from the occasional naturally occurring fish die offs due to the increasing salinity. As far as the smell is concerned, I suppose it depends on what part of the shoreline you land on as the geothermal plants to the south and the agricultural fields to the north would certainly explain offensive orders. I, myself, have never thought it stank on any of my enjoyable visits. AND, for the record, there is nothing SMART in developing raw land in the middle of a desert on top of the San Andreas Fault miles away from any services or infrastructure, the view aside. Black Emerald would earn more points from the sustainable development/environmental community if it were to redevelop existing urban slums instead, I would think.


InOmbra March 21, 2012 @ 8:20 a.m.

For a detailed report on the backers and the current lawsuit, see the March 14 2012 Builder Online: http://www.builderonline.com/development/lawsuit-seeks-to-halt-huge-socal-housing-project.aspx

Interesting data: "Salton City, which in the 1950s was drawn up as a 25,000-household community. According to the 2010 Census, Salton City currently has only 1,204 households and 3,763 people, and is riddled by foreclosures..."


Ruth Newell March 21, 2012 @ 12:16 p.m.

Well, in the '50's--'60's the Sea was a hot spot--the State Park had more than 15 boat ramps if that is any indication of how popular it was. And yes, there are existing towns along the coastline that are mostly abandoned. The developers would do well to begin reviving them given the footprint and infrastructure has already been established.


Sign in to comment

Let’s Be Friends

Subscribe for local event alerts, concerts tickets, promotions and more from the San Diego Reader