4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs

Kodak Down 5%. Brandes Takes Another Hit

San Diego's beleaguered money manager, Brandes Investment Partners, is taking more hits this morning (Feb. 20). Eastman Kodak stock is trading at $3.39, down 5.04 percent on the day. As of Sept. 30, Brandes owned 9.61 percent of the stock, the second largest institutional holding. Kodak stock is down 94 percent in the last 12 years. Other Brandes disasters, based on Sept. 30 data, are General Motors, selling for $1.55, Brandes owning 6.03 percent, third largest institutional holder. Ford, $1.51, 4.88%, 4th largest; Gannett, $3.76, 10.81%, second largest; McClatchy, 48 cents, 6.58%, 3rd largest; Royal Bank of Scotland, $5.31, 2.69%, largest. This British bank, essentially nationalized, underwent a 20-1 reverse split, so its high for the last year is $163.12. It has lost almost all its value. Brandes also got hit hard in Freddie Mac, Washington Mutual, and Countrywide. In late 2007, Brandes had $125 billion under management; at yearend last year that was down to $53 billion.

Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all

Previous article

San Diego in books - Henry Miller, Rick DeMarinis, Max Miller, Alfred Alcorn

Don Bauder, World Almanac, Louisiana Purchase Exposition Commission
Next Article

The Addams Family 2: new kooky characters gone wrong

Cousin Itt’s synthetic CG likeness owes more to Dawk than it does Feliz Silla’s hair suit.

San Diego's beleaguered money manager, Brandes Investment Partners, is taking more hits this morning (Feb. 20). Eastman Kodak stock is trading at $3.39, down 5.04 percent on the day. As of Sept. 30, Brandes owned 9.61 percent of the stock, the second largest institutional holding. Kodak stock is down 94 percent in the last 12 years. Other Brandes disasters, based on Sept. 30 data, are General Motors, selling for $1.55, Brandes owning 6.03 percent, third largest institutional holder. Ford, $1.51, 4.88%, 4th largest; Gannett, $3.76, 10.81%, second largest; McClatchy, 48 cents, 6.58%, 3rd largest; Royal Bank of Scotland, $5.31, 2.69%, largest. This British bank, essentially nationalized, underwent a 20-1 reverse split, so its high for the last year is $163.12. It has lost almost all its value. Brandes also got hit hard in Freddie Mac, Washington Mutual, and Countrywide. In late 2007, Brandes had $125 billion under management; at yearend last year that was down to $53 billion.

Sponsored
Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all
Comments
32

Don, So many lives ruined for what? Greed? Corruption? Now we are going to help the ones that did wrong?

March 5, 2009

hopefully some day this clown and his texan buddy w. james brown will finally be exposed and held accountable.

March 11, 2009

I agree with V-I-I-D 100%.

Why are we subsidizing the slime balls who made all the profits while wrecking the lives of the poor and middle class????

Let AIG fail-unwind the garbage dirivatives.

Let GM fail, the compnay will juss get a new owner and can redo their bottom line detsroying the bad money costing contracts (wow, I never thought I would see the day that I went against a private union).

It hurts, and it is going to be painful-but the poor and middle class should NOT have to pay for the mistakes of these fools.

March 5, 2009

BIP down another 10% atleast today. Staggering. A drunk, chimp on acid throwing darts could do better.

March 5, 2009

Response to post #31: A lot of people have to be brought to justice. Best, Don Bauder

March 12, 2009

Response to post #25: Yes, the greed and corruption of the post-Reagan years matched the greed and corruption of the 1920s. Will we end up the same way? Stay tuned. Best, Don Bauder

March 6, 2009

Response to post #26: The government is worried about the counter-parties in derivatives of AIG and many other financial institutions. There has to be a way to get rid of those derivatives so AIG can go BK. The next argument is that an AIG BK would be disastrous, because the company handles such a huge percentage of 401(k)s. Come now. Do you think there aren't other insurers that can administrate these plans? Best, Don Bauder

March 6, 2009

Response to post #25: I have never seen a drunk chimp on acid throwing darts at a list of stocks. But it is great imagery. Best, Don Bauder

March 6, 2009

Is it possible their luck with investment picks could turn around? Sheesh, what a bunch of losers.

Feb. 20, 2009

They have to be down to $40 Billion or less now. They also own stakes in BAC, C, WFC, MU, MOT, XRX etc etc etc...look at the new 10 year low list and they most likely not only own it but have a huge stake at prices 10X higher. I can pay no fees and lose this kind of money.

Feb. 20, 2009

Response to post #1: Charles Brandes takes the Graham-Dodd value approach. Through the years, value investing has done better than other strategies, such as growth investing, but value has taken a bad beating in 2008-2009. Other value investors have been hit, too, but I don't know that they have been hit as hard as Brandes. Value investors look for beaten-down stocks -- often ones with good, underpriced assets. It doesn't seem to be working this time. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 20, 2009

Response to post #2: B of A, Chrysler, Motorola, Xerox, etc. have all been pounded. Again, they are beaten-down, old-style blue chips -- attractive to a value investor. But the ones Brandes chose have not done well: autos, financials, newspapers have been putrid. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 20, 2009

Reply to #3 - The biggest downfall with their approach is failure to incorporate the macroeconomic picture. They are so convinced that what happens in the "market" does not matter that in an economy like this, they get crushed. Thing is that nobody has ever went through something like this unless you are in your 90s.

Feb. 20, 2009

A Brandes and his investor's money are soon parted.

Feb. 20, 2009

It is better to be thought a Brandes than to make lousy stock picks and remove all doubt.

Feb. 20, 2009

Response to post #5: Yes, I think value investors often don't take new trends into account. They tend to think that if GM, Ford, Bank of America and various newspaper stocks were once good buys, and now appear cheap, that the market must have overreacted. But, as you point out, conditions change. On the other hand, growth investors tend to fall into their own traps, too. They fall in love with techs, worshipping technological progress, but forget that competition is ferocious in the tech area and a lot of companies fall by the wayside. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 20, 2009

Response to post #6: It has worked out that way in the last couple of years. Incidentally, one institution that uses Brandes to manage part of its money is SDCERS. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 20, 2009

Response to post #7: Another memorable aphorism. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 20, 2009

Don, tell me how this place can stay in business? Wouldn;t pension fund managers be doing due diligence and fire them for someone with better numbers? If you saw a list of their portfolio, you would be shocked. It is littered with absolute junk. I think they should do a video online explaining themselves. To think they go show off the wealth at multi-million dollar halloween bashes makes someone who has lost 75% of their money feel like the biggest SUCKER in loli-pop history!

Feb. 20, 2009

Response to post #11: Not all Brandes numbers are bad. True, they badly underperform the benchmarks in many areas, but there are some areas in which they overperform. Not many now, however. There is no doubt: they are on a losing streak. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 20, 2009

Reply to #12 - Really? I am curious to which numbers you think are good? You can subtract another 30% on US VALUE and 20% on INTL since December.

Would you put any money there personally?

Feb. 21, 2009

Response to post #13: I was relying on yearend 2008 numbers. Definitely, some of the categories outperformed the benchmarks. I posted this at the time. If, as you say, there have been higher-than-average losses since the first of the year, then Brandes may no longer be overperforming in those areas. We will have to wait for his first quarter report, I think. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 21, 2009

Reply to #14 - A dart throwing chimp could have done better than this. Truly lousy managers here. An embarrassment to claim they "know" some method of investing that is worth their huge fees. Well, only a 100% return followed by a 100% return to get back to even. UGH!

Feb. 22, 2009

Response to post #15: No doubt about it, value investing has not worked in this market. Brandes seems to have done worse than other value investors. No method has worked in this market: growth investing has failed, too. Value used to do better than growth over a long period. It doesn't seem to be happening in this market. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 22, 2009

Reply to #16 - They should dissolve before any more lives are ruined. People have lost so much money here and they don't even know what they are doing. How else do you explain buying tons of banks and homebuilders LAST SUMMER? Just because you can build a $60 million home doesn't mean the RE market is booming or in for a turnaround.

Feb. 28, 2009

Response to post #17: Charles Brandes concedes he got into financials too early. Boy, is that a mouthful. Best, Don Bauder

Feb. 28, 2009

So much for Margin of Safety. If I hear that term again, I will scream. One thing is for sure...NOBODY knows how to invest. The whole thing is a big scam.

March 2, 2009

valueinvestingisdead, do you manage money for a living????

Give us the scoop on what you do. I liked the line about chimps making better stock picks throwing darts- and not charging a fee.

This thread reminds me of all the real estate agents who came into the market in the late 90's and early 2,000's who had never been through a recession and all they knew was an up market- they had no clue how the real estate market could turn.

March 2, 2009

Response to post #19: I agree that no person has ever had a sure-fire method of investing in the stock market. It's like having a sure-fire way to win at the racetrack: there is no such thing, for the outsider at least. (Of course, a lot of races are fixed. And the stock market is often rigged. But even so, there is no way to get it right every time.) Best, Don Bauder

March 2, 2009

Response to post #20: What got me about all those young real estate hotshots of the early 2000s is that only ten years earlier in San Diego there had been a big setback in real estate values. There had been many other downswoops through the years, too. Best, Don Bauder

March 2, 2009

Where is all this money going that is lost? Makes you wonder if the 3-4 families that control the World's money supply is gobbling it all up. The middle class is ruined and now enslaved to the super elite for way lower wages going forward. Evil World.

March 3, 2009

Response to post #23: It's paper wealth that is evanescing -- stock and real estate markets. You sure have suffered from the phenomenon. Best, Don Bauder

March 3, 2009

Sign in to comment

Sign in

Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed Big Screen — Movie commentary Blurt — Music's inside track Booze News — San Diego spirits Classical Music — Immortal beauty Classifieds — Free and easy Cover Stories — Front-page features Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts Feast! — Food & drink reviews Feature Stories — Local news & stories From the Archives — Spotlight on the past Golden Dreams — Talk of the town Letters — Our inbox [email protected] — Local movie buffs share favorites Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news News Ticker — News & politics Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated Poetry — The old and the new Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers Reading — The hunt for intellectuals Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds SD on the QT — Almost factual news Sheep and Goats — Places of worship Special Issues — The best of Street Style — San Diego streets have style Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads Your Week — Daily event picks
4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs
Close