Recent advertising in favor of Proposition 16 state that if the PG&E-sponsored constitutional amendment passes, then Californians get the right to a 2/3 vote on creating municipal public utilities.

But it appears that voters in the City of San Diego already have the right to do the same with a simple majority vote, courtesy of the 1970 electricity franchise agreement that covers current franchise grantee SDG&E.

According to Section 17 of the franchise agreement, the electors in San Diego have the right by a simple majority to amend or terminate the franchise agreement with SDG&E. Together with other franchise language authorizing the City's right to acquire SDG&E properties through eminent domain, it appears that San Diego voters already have the power to create a municipal franchise by default once an initiative to terminate the franchise is approved by a simple majority (http://www.sandiego.gov/undergrounding/pdf/sdgefranchiseagree.pdf).

This blogger believes that a constitutional amendment requiring a 2/3 vote for a municipal utility effectively would ultimately negate the franchise language on our right to terminate the franchise agreement by a simple majority vote.

A NO vote on Proposition 16 would definitely be in order this June.

Comments

Sign in to comment

Let’s Be Friends

Subscribe for local event alerts, concerts tickets, promotions and more from the San Diego Reader

Close