Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Archives
Classifieds
Stories
Events
Contests
Music
Movies
Theater
Food
Legal Guide
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Ex-Gay Community Publisher Portantino Takes Own Life
deleted by me. Wrong spot.— December 11, 2010 9:24 a.m.
Ex-Gay Community Publisher Portantino Takes Own Life
I think they are playing Bridgepoint in the Toilet Bowl.— December 10, 2010 10:43 a.m.
Ex-Gay Community Publisher Portantino Takes Own Life
Don, At first I thought this was a joke, but it appears you have actually been spammed by a pretend college!— December 10, 2010 6:52 a.m.
Ex-Gay Community Publisher Portantino Takes Own Life
Praise from Atkins and Kehoe, but not so much from Dumanis and DeMaio?— December 9, 2010 11:21 p.m.
Padres Trade Gonzalez, Say ESPN, U-T
Just to point out the obvious: In 1996 the Padres payroll was $33.3 million and the Yankees payroll was $61.5 million. In 2010 the Padres payroll was $38.2 million and the Yankees payroll was $206.7 million. Somehow, the Padres still felt the need to jettison 4 of their top 5 paid players and cut their payroll by 1/3 to around $26 million. Thank god we built Petco so Moores could keep up with the salaries needed to compete. 12 years ago in 1998 Moores could only afford a $53 million dollar payroll leading up to the vote for a new stadium, but now with the new stadium the payroll has skyrocketed to .... half that?— December 9, 2010 12:46 a.m.
LA Times Cites San Diego Public Corruption
Of course, as part of the upgrade the numbers were removed from the posts for all blogs, not just new ones. That means the reference numbers used to link responses in past blog entries are now meaningless, making it difficult to match a response to a post in any story prior to today.— November 12, 2010 11:22 a.m.
LA Times Cites San Diego Public Corruption
Finally, the Reader has a reply button! Now if somebody can just fix the hard-coded narrow display. As it is, by the fifth reply or so it will be down to two words per line!— November 12, 2010 11:17 a.m.
Proposition D Thumbed Down Overwhelmingly
Response to #17 & #30 SP said: "If you take out the public employees who had a vested interest in getting D passed, it would have most likely failed by 3-1." SP, there are (at least) two strong reasons why you are off the mark on this one; 1) The vast majority of city employees are not union hacks and don't want their sales tax raised any more than you do. The margin was undoubtedly narrower among city employees, but it wouldn't surprise me at all to find that it lost even among employees. 2) A sizable percentage of city employees don't live in the city and weren't eligible to vote either way.— November 3, 2010 7:36 p.m.
SEC: One Touchdown, One Fumble
"I wonder what search engines did with this" I just searched for SEC and football on google, and your blog post was listed number 2!— October 27, 2010 8:22 a.m.
Sanders's "Frighten 'Em" Prop. D Scam
Don, A Correction: Pat reported that 2 crime lab DNA positions would be eliminated, not that the crime lab would close.— October 21, 2010 10:01 a.m.