Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Archives
Classifieds
Stories
Events
Contests
Music
Movies
Theater
Food
Legal Guide
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Yay! Got the cash and pills
You said it!— April 16, 2015 3:42 p.m.
Something sinister in Warsaw?
MURPHYJUNK--that's it, exactly.— April 16, 2015 9:56 a.m.
Something sinister in Warsaw?
Speaking of scripts, when will the James Bond series use Peevey for a model of evil genius? Or should there be a new series, with Peevey as the anti-hero? Is there any evidence that Peevey once acted in a way that would benefit the greater good, or has he always been strictly the 'looking out for number one' kind of guy? I ask this, because I do think he will find a place somewhere in the collective consciousness, and it won't be a place of honor.— April 15, 2015 11:51 a.m.
Fired — and not liking it at all
What's that Jim Croce line again? "Meaner than a junkyard dog"? Larry Anderson and Leroy Brown would have made a great team.— April 8, 2015 8:45 a.m.
Reduce water…and continue building? Huh?
swell--New developments have for the past 30+ years been assigned to Mello-Roos districts, sometimes listed as special assessment districts. For up to 40 years, these homeowners pay into funds which are supposed to support the building of schools, roads and other infrastructure that these new communities need. Part of the fund goes to the city (whatever city that may be) and part to the school district(s). Many of these funds specify a 25 year period of payments into these funds. Occasionally, the developer pays upfront, which is why sometimes you will see "No Mello-Roos!" advertised on banners or billboards at these developments. Unfortunately, the Mello-Roos is well-funded, but there are many problems with the usage of the funds. School districts do not have Oversight Committees for Mello-Roos funds the way they do (or should have) for the various bond measures that are passed. There is little to no reporting of the status of Mello-Roos funds as they contribute to cities and school districts. Specific totals are frequently glossed over, funds are mixed, and in Sweetwater, for example, it has been said that CFD #1 has been at 180% of funding--yet the Sweetwater school district continues to increase Mello-Roos by the 2% per year allowable by law. Constituents requested an audit of Mello-Roos funds last fall, and we thought we were getting an audit. But the temporary board, filled by one permanent member, John McCann, and four appointees from the County Board of Education TOOK IT UPON THEMSELVES TO CHANGE THIS TO A REVIEW. Which was essentially meaningless. As is the County Board of Education, for the most part. But I digress. In summary: all areas that have Mello-Roos funding going to school districts and cities should demand a full accounting of all monies collected and spent, because there is way too much nonsense taking place. And by nonsense, feel free to use your collective imaginations. It is not an exaggeration to realize that millions are collected and there are no real controls on the spending. It's free money for those with no moral compass, which is why it has been such a problem in the Sweetwater school district. So sad that Susan Luzzaro is no longer reporting for the Reader. Her voice is a good one, and is greatly missed. The Reader's loss. And a great loss to all who respect community reporting.— April 8, 2015 8:27 a.m.
Fired — and not liking it at all
I do think that there was a very bad pattern of driving people to distraction or near distraction as a means of discrediting their legitimate concerns, and many people didn't realize how manipulative Mr. Anderson and his cohorts were.— April 2, 2015 12:18 a.m.
Fired — and not liking it at all
Not a problem!— April 1, 2015 7:03 p.m.
Fired — and not liking it at all
While I am not a true expert in the matter, I believe it is safe to say that Larry Anderson went out of his way to make Ms. Sterling look bad in the eyes of the public--and he did so using illegal maneuvers and cruel tactics, eventually being called on his behavior--but that was long after damage had been done. If there is a good thing that can be said for Larry Anderson, I will let you know--when that day comes. But don't postpone doing anything while waiting. Just another opinion from the gallery.— April 1, 2015 2:43 p.m.
Fired — and not liking it at all
Yes, well, that was only partially tongue in cheek!— April 1, 2015 2:37 p.m.
The White Snake slithers into the Old Globe
In full agreement! This was a delight to see!— April 1, 2015 2:24 p.m.