Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Close to Home — What it’s like on the street where you live
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
UT-TV goes dark on cable
I believe it was for radio station KPRI.— February 20, 2014 11:25 p.m.
UT-TV goes dark on cable
I don't get to run over mine until Friday morning. I wish it would come on Thursday, as it would give me time to get in into the recycle barrel before it gets picked up on Friday.— February 20, 2014 11:21 p.m.
UT-TV goes dark on cable
They couldn't reach a deal with TWC? Sounds like Fox Sports San Diego. All the Manchester U-T had to do was wait another year or 2, and I'm sure TWC would have added them to the line-up. Maybe TWC figured that the Manchester U-T's TV channel had nothing of importance to add to the cable lineup. They would be correct.— February 19, 2014 1:36 p.m.
City attorney’s report on medical marijuana ordinance
So what happens if Laura Duffy enforces Federal Law and closes them down (or if there are vending machines, confiscates them)?— February 17, 2014 4:17 p.m.
Guy in the sky: Drought no joke
Lake Henshaw never has much water in it, as the authorities have been worried for years about the dam's ability to hold back water.— February 16, 2014 10:08 a.m.
Filner accuser McCormack Jackson to get $250K
Don: And may you live and write many more years.— February 14, 2014 9:32 a.m.
Filner accuser McCormack Jackson to get $250K
Don: Comcast bought TWC for $45 billion. They might need more than a few billion.— February 13, 2014 10:49 p.m.
Filner accuser McCormack Jackson to get $250K
Don: I do not think you are paranoid, and I may not be skeptical enough. Knowing your history writing about San Diego, I fear your writings about me not being skeptical enough may turn out to be true, and I could be in for a rude awakening. I know you will keep digging, and I will keep reading.— February 13, 2014 10:45 p.m.
Filner accuser McCormack Jackson to get $250K
Don: True, the system doesn't work very well. But Filner gave the "powers that be" all they needed. I refuse to believe this was an orchestrated plot based on the number of women involved. I may be naïve in thinking that way, but I can't believe that San Diego is THAT corrupt. As far as Filner going bankrupt--the first settlement (apparently) stated that Filner was not financially liable in the settlement. What about attorney's fees? Never heard about those.— February 13, 2014 10:39 p.m.
Chargers pushing for $700 million stadium in spite of city debt
Don: I know part of the alleged Chargers plan for a new stadium is to use the ruse of selling the Qualcomm property and Sports Arena property to generate revenue to help pay for a new stadium, as this will keep general fund revenues from having to be used, thereby saving the city hundreds of millions of dollars. Which, of course, is utter B.S., as money from the sale of those properties would have gone into the general fund to begin with. So the team wants that money to go directly into the monies needed to build Spanosworld. Not to mention the sale of those properties is supposed to go to a vote of the people. I wouldn't mind seeing a ballot measure--maybe the citizens would finally get to see the actual Chargers proposal regarding actual cost, who would pay what, and an actual artist's rendering of what the stadium would look like and how many seats it would have. And I am SURE it would be written in a VERY impartial way. And then I could vote NO. The next move would be up to the Chargers.— February 13, 2014 1:09 p.m.