Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Archives
Classifieds
Stories
Events
Contests
Music
Movies
Theater
Food
Legal Guide
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
De La Fuente's posh Uruguay restaurant ordered closed
According to an article on 6/27/08 in Voice of San Diego, Judge Linda Quinn threw out de la Fuente's final case against the City of San Diego. De la Fuente had appealed an earlier reversal of his judgement against the city all the way to the SCOTUS, but in May of '07, that court refused to hear the case. So I assume that case is done.— June 9, 2013 11:33 a.m.
Edison shutting down San Onofre permanently
Get ready for the other shoe to drop--the rate hikes to dismantle the facility.— June 7, 2013 8:53 a.m.
Why the UT should be called the Union-Redneck
The various ownership groups of the Padres have always claimed that THEY were responsible for debt service on the bonds. That was one reason they always claimed they couldn't have a larger payroll than they did. Of course, the new ballpark was supposed to give them the higher revenues to enable them to have higher payrolls...— June 3, 2013 9:28 p.m.
Why the UT should be called the Union-Redneck
TOT revenues were supposed to be paying off the ballpark bonds, but when the city allowed Moores to build more condos and less hotels, that pretty much guaranteed the City of San Diego would be picking up that tab.— June 3, 2013 9:24 p.m.
Why the UT should be called the Union-Redneck
The longer it drags on, the higher the number. I'm not advocating building it, but I wonder how all of the "powers that be" will spin a new stadium that will pay for itself, just like Petco Park (which, of course, isn't).— June 3, 2013 5:56 p.m.
David Copley's downtown condo sold for $3.4 million
3101 might have been Moores' condo. I thought he had part (if not all) of the top floor so he could watch his neighborhood (and his wallet) grow.— June 3, 2013 11:35 a.m.
David Copley's downtown condo sold for $3.4 million
Now I know why I'm fat--we have ants all over the yard. I can't eat fast enough!— June 3, 2013 11:30 a.m.
David Copley's downtown condo sold for $3.4 million
I do know it was originally listed for just under $4 million when his estate put it up for sale.— June 3, 2013 9:03 a.m.
David Copley's downtown condo sold for $3.4 million
Don--I had the time to look, but I fully admit, I was too lazy.— June 3, 2013 8:26 a.m.
David Copley's downtown condo sold for $3.4 million
Wonder how much Copley paid for it initially.— June 2, 2013 11:02 p.m.