Please see the link I supplied at http://www.sandiegoreader.com/weblogs/news-ticker… and Don's comment.
Since the "country's egregious education failures . . . involve our nation's future," what should be our strategy in moving it in a better direction?
Colleges and Universities should have charters--someone could work on providing a Word file on them. If there were enough people willing to devote just a little time to do this for one institution, then they could be assembled in one place and shared.
A chart could be prepared that would illustrate the standards and objectives of the charters and group them according to their similarities--what they have in common, and which ones were outliers. Do "land-grant" institutions group well? Outliers, should then stand out from the herd, such as those with honest scholarship programs and other student-support rather than student enslavement-to-debt-for-life de jure or de facto policies, consistent or inconsistent with their own charters. Nail down hypocrisy, such as blather about "the success of our students being our primary concern" that is contrary to the evidence.
That is, a project like this, given a disciplinary framework, could then develop a comprehensive study that is backed up with specifics rather than opinion and generalities without foundation or with the foundations hidden from the reader. That is, we could put our collective muscle where our "mouths" are and actually get something done.
Don needs help. We can all start a "tree" where we disseminate information to our friends, thus increasing effective "circulation" and increasing eyeballs for the Reader.
I have restrained myself from going into more detail to keep this short, and I want to encourage others to contribute their own ideas. I will mention in closing, however, that this might be taken up by one or more professors and their students--is that irony, or what?
— March 5, 2013 9:23 a.m.
Massachusetts nails LPL Financial
Knock, knock--are you there?— March 8, 2013 10:42 p.m.
Hotel/worker battle escalates as cops arrest 20
We who fail to stick together will hang together.— March 8, 2013 10:41 p.m.
For-profit education stocks hit on legislation fear
I agree that "success of our students" should not be a university's primary concern, nor should it be the student's concern, as in "preparing for the job market." But beyond knowledge lies UNDERSTANDING, which that magical moment when everything comes together, a "breaking through."— March 8, 2013 10:38 p.m.
San Diegans in their 20s don't make enough for rent
What is most important is consideration of the tougher questions regarding the nature of CONCENTRATED power. The authoritarian personality needs other authoritarians who will do the boss' bidding. Back to the Milgram study.— March 8, 2013 10:32 p.m.
San Diego, haven for pyramids
Didn't Amway get started selling alfalfa capsules? I won't visit the links, because I don't want ANY kind of connection with those flim-flammin' crooks.— March 5, 2013 9:50 a.m.
San Diegans in their 20s don't make enough for rent
. . . with the consent of the governed. The TRUE consent of the governed. The problem with rank is that it stifles creativity and concentrates power. Name ten people in history who have resisted that kind of temptation. Or at least start the list with the first one that comes to mind . . .— March 5, 2013 9:37 a.m.
For-profit education stocks hit on legislation fear
Please see the link I supplied at http://www.sandiegoreader.com/weblogs/news-ticker… and Don's comment. Since the "country's egregious education failures . . . involve our nation's future," what should be our strategy in moving it in a better direction? Colleges and Universities should have charters--someone could work on providing a Word file on them. If there were enough people willing to devote just a little time to do this for one institution, then they could be assembled in one place and shared. A chart could be prepared that would illustrate the standards and objectives of the charters and group them according to their similarities--what they have in common, and which ones were outliers. Do "land-grant" institutions group well? Outliers, should then stand out from the herd, such as those with honest scholarship programs and other student-support rather than student enslavement-to-debt-for-life de jure or de facto policies, consistent or inconsistent with their own charters. Nail down hypocrisy, such as blather about "the success of our students being our primary concern" that is contrary to the evidence. That is, a project like this, given a disciplinary framework, could then develop a comprehensive study that is backed up with specifics rather than opinion and generalities without foundation or with the foundations hidden from the reader. That is, we could put our collective muscle where our "mouths" are and actually get something done. Don needs help. We can all start a "tree" where we disseminate information to our friends, thus increasing effective "circulation" and increasing eyeballs for the Reader. I have restrained myself from going into more detail to keep this short, and I want to encourage others to contribute their own ideas. I will mention in closing, however, that this might be taken up by one or more professors and their students--is that irony, or what?— March 5, 2013 9:23 a.m.
Accreditor puts Bridgepoint on notice
I suspect that the "science" behind it might be untrustworthy.— March 5, 2013 8:38 a.m.
Accreditor puts Bridgepoint on notice
See: http://chronicle.com/img/photos/biz/26employers_o…— March 4, 2013 8:47 p.m.
Hotel/worker battle escalates as cops arrest 20
I will boycott them.— March 2, 2013 9:59 p.m.