Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Close to Home — What it’s like on the street where you live
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
The Swift Justice Of Cosmetology
I am waiting for my dept. to return the entire message sent them, so I can check the IP address. I do not think it will turn out to be you, Josh. I don't think you are capable of quoting the theories (however hodge-podged they were) that goatttfish quoted. If you had half the knowledge he did, you wouldn't be writing the blogs you do. If you slapped me in the face, there would be consequences beyond your wildest dreams. As Pete might say, "Bank on that, sweetie." ;)— November 22, 2009 1:20 a.m.
The Swift Justice Of Cosmetology
I'll check the IP address on my own--don't need to enter a wager with a non-gentleman. "But then...many of your theories on people don't." Let's hear it Josh, oh master theorizer of humanity. Examples of my theories not bearing out, whatever those might be.— November 22, 2009 12:57 a.m.
The Swift Justice Of Cosmetology
re:#32: You are going to quote "Anal retentive" to me from wiki? Why is that particular diagnosis (besides the oedipal complex) the reference point for people who know nothing about psychology or psychoanalysis? Maybe you can research that one. No, I don't overanalyze you--it really doesn't take that much analysis, much less overanalysis to read you, Pete. I simply remember what you have said in the past and take your current statements in the context of the sum total. re: #35: "asses" re:#36: This just in! Gringo follows Eddie Izzard on Twitter! re:#39: Telling us you were bored by our convo on wedding dresses would not have ruined the discussion, Pete, any more than if I chose to step into your "endless" monologues on football and remind you that you are very repetitive on that subject. Remember, you aren't really god. re:#41: Can you consider that perhaps your admittedly slowed mental growth due to PTSD has interfered with your understanding of matters of the adult heart? And your ability to speak accurately for the majority of males? You have to "wonder" about a man who considers how he and his life partner will influence each other for the better? re: #44: Oh, hi there, Josh-ette!— November 22, 2009 12:39 a.m.
San Diego Coalition of Reason
re: #103: Only ideally. That's when you close the second cover. This never ends... re: #102: Then they came for African Americans, but I was off lynching them, with my comrades.— November 21, 2009 11:36 p.m.
San Diego Coalition of Reason
I love everyone in this debate--for the space of it, at least. Even you, Pete ;)— November 21, 2009 11:09 p.m.
The Swift Justice Of Cosmetology
I didn't think you meant that--just that your point was perhaps oblique. But-- dumbed down for whom? "And SD, a battle of wits? I prefer intellegent exchange of ideas." I was kidding--I've been called "stupid" several times this week by a couple of the most obtuse individuals I've ever met. Allow me a freaking joke, gringo.— November 21, 2009 6:59 p.m.
Obama taps Alan Bersin to oversee the border
re: #58: Visduh confessed: "Hey, maybe he's in a hurry, or maybe he's enjoyed his cocktail hour too much. Both factors can degrade ones performance." Poor Visduh. You know, there are drugs to help ;)— November 21, 2009 6:26 p.m.
The Swift Justice Of Cosmetology
re: #24: Points taken. (I think you meant "oblique," though--not obtuse). And it does seem that you have called out female posters angrily, while seemingly unconcerned when Pete or Josh ridicule women for being--"women" as they see it. For example, it wasn't "broad," gringo--it was "DUMB broad," so let's not pretty it up or mitigate it. I'm tired of it too; perhaps our being tired of it will influence those who persist in relying on such easy, unfunny, unintelligent--and pointless material. I will not be pigeonholed, spend most of my time contributing informed or well-argued opinion on a variety of subjects, do not spend my time "endlessly" droning about weddings or other inane subjects--and stay away from the topics if you don't like them, Pete-- and am ready to take on any poster, male or female, to a battle of wits.:)— November 21, 2009 6:18 p.m.
The Swift Justice Of Cosmetology
re: #22: Pete, if you are trying to claim that you were being tongue-in-cheek, it doesn't work for you. Your claims about women and people of color are sometimes meant as a kind of joke, but you are always dead serious, whether you realize it or not. Sometimes you accept that you are a misogynist and a racist, and other times you deny it. That is called "ambivalence." re: #21: Pikey, I wouldn't place any bets on that particular match ;) And by now, I guess you know that your pristine threads are going to be soiled a bit here and there. I've only been blogging for about eight months and only on this site, but it's long enough to know that people are passionate about issues and everyone snarks. I hope you can take it as you would listening to the ambient noises and the great rush of squabbling humanity on the street outside your window, like Stella does (and forgets to blog about it).— November 21, 2009 4:20 p.m.
Help! Help! Help!
I only enter wagers with gentlemen. Speaking of gentlemen in the plural, Cuddles you are going to have to ask at least one more handle, possibly two, to marry you. ;)— November 21, 2009 4:13 p.m.