Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Print Edition
Classifieds
Stories
Events
Contests
Music
Movies
Theater
Food
Life Events
Cannabis
May 15, 2024
May 8, 2024
May 1, 2024
April 24, 2024
April 17, 2024
April 10, 2024
April 2, 2024
March 27, 2024
March 20, 2024
March 13, 2024
March 6, 2024
February 28, 2024
Close
May 15, 2024
May 8, 2024
May 1, 2024
April 24, 2024
April 17, 2024
April 10, 2024
April 2, 2024
March 27, 2024
March 20, 2024
March 13, 2024
March 6, 2024
February 28, 2024
May 15, 2024
May 8, 2024
May 1, 2024
April 24, 2024
April 17, 2024
April 10, 2024
April 2, 2024
March 27, 2024
March 20, 2024
March 13, 2024
March 6, 2024
February 28, 2024
Close
Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Prominent entrepreneur sues prominent judge
Don, What do you mean "may be"? For now ten years I've been screaming about McConnell, Aaron, and MacDonald writing a 2006 anti-SLAPP opinion in which they concealed that the plaintiff and his attorney were lying to manufacture reason for malice in a SLAPP over scientific fraud in policies and toxic torts. For ten years I'm been screaming about her concealment that a retired Deputy Director of CDC National Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) was a concealed party to the SLAPP. For six years I've been screaming about Huffman, Benke and Irrion burying the evidence in a 2010 Appellate Opinion that McConnell, Aaron, and MacDonald fixed their 2006 anti-SLAPP Opinion as they proceeded to additionally conceal that the face of the judgment from the case is a fraud. It didn't acknowledge that I was a trial prevailing party. That is a Penal Code violation under 134 to conceal falsified and back-dated court documents. It's punishable by up to four years in prison. Ya know what would help me to stop having to scream for another decaed as lives are still being destroyed by McConnell's continued burying a phoney court docs in SLAPP? Some media sunlight on her and fellow 4th/1st justices' decade of unrepentant and unpunished case fixing SLAPP to defraud the United States public. Hint! hint!— July 21, 2016 6:32 a.m.
Prominent entrepreneur sues prominent judge
Oooo-kay. Well, it looks like I may have shut down yet one more discussion of problems in the San Diego courts by my directly stating and providing the evidence that Judy McConnell belongs behind bars for the rest of her life -- for case fixing and concealment of falsified SLAPP documents purposed to harm the lives of thousands. Ya know that saying "Evil flourishes when good men stand by and do nothing"? That's the nightmare I have been living for now over a decade. C'est la vie. I'm not shutting up until that woman is behind bars. Too many lives remain at stake for me to be silenced. See "Justice Judith McConnell, Grow a conscience. People are dying from your fraud upon the court." https://katysexposure.wordpress.com/2015/11/11/ju…— July 18, 2016 10:54 p.m.
Prominent entrepreneur sues prominent judge
CCP 425.17 was never really about stopping unethical application of CCP 426.16. It was about making those who spoke out of wrongs and were retaliated against under the color of law -- look like they were crying "foul" over nothing. I am told that 4th/1st Justice Cynthia Aaron was a big proponent of the creation and implimentation of CCP 425.17. I have no documentation to prove that, but for good cause I believe it to be true. The 4th/1st has a bad habit of misquoting codes not based on facts in evidence or rules of law. For six years they've been burying the evidence that a back-dated void-on-its-face judgment wrongfully did not state I was a trail prevailing party entitled to costs. They can't lawfully recall and rescind their 2010 remittitur so the void-on-its-face 2008 judgment may be vacated w/o exposing that they fixed a SLAPP suit over a matter impacting the public health and safety of tens of thousands of people. No one will punish them for criminal concealment of falsified court docs in SLAPP. NO ONE.— July 18, 2016 10:30 a.m.
Prominent entrepreneur sues prominent judge
Please call me "Sharon". Correct that Mr. Kinsella's federal suit against McConnell does not name the CJP. His suit is merely one example of ethics problems in the CA courts. The problems continue b/c the CJP has been a toothless watchdog -- to the point that orgs from across the state (and nation?) are calling for an audit of the CJP. This is what I was showing you in the above link to the Center for Judicial Excellence. FYI, there is another federal suit involving case-fixing (for lack of a better term) by San Diego jurists. I THINK it should have some decision within the next few weeks. In this federal matter, the CJP is a named defendant. It's the California Coalition of Families and Children suit. http://www.weightiermatter.com/uncategorized/nint…— July 17, 2016 9:19 a.m.
Prominent entrepreneur sues prominent judge
Seems Mr. Kinsella and his legal counsel were wise to take this matter out of the California state courts and into federal court. There is a systemic problem in the CA judicial branch which is feeding McConnell's and company's self perception of being above the law, with no fear of punishment. The Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP) is mandated by the CA Constitution to admonish judiciaries for unethical behavior. In reality, the CJP is a toothless watchdog, which often times covers-up the bad behavior. McConnell is their former chairwoman. On August 10, 2016 discussion of a Bureau of State Auditors (BSA) audit of the CJP is to be heard before the CA Joint Legislative Audit Committee. One can read of it in the below link: http://www.centerforjudicialexcellence.org/cje-ad…— July 17, 2016 5:38 a.m.
Prominent entrepreneur sues prominent judge
Don, thanks for saying people shouldn't judge w/o knowing the subject. Respectfully, you're incorrect, SF, that I haven't picked my battles wisely. I picked one to stop a scientific fraud in environmental medicine that is harming thousands. I was rewarded with McConnell's 4th/1st concealing falsified court documents in Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPP) to keep the fraud going. She has to be prosecuted for me to win this battle. I don't have the finances of Mr. Kinsela to file a civil suit. That doesn't change that her unrepentant concealment of back-dated court docs in SLAPP is a felony under CA Penal Code 134; or that her felony court-doc-concealment continues to harm thousands. No one from CA to DC seems to want to prosecute her. Many attys seem to fear her retaliation. I've been told many times of attys who like to help, but have families to feed. I am doing the best I can with no legal counsel and no sunlight from the media on the SLAPP-fixing. They call me "Woman with Stones" http://survivingmold.createsend1.com/t/ViewEmail/… I think Mr. Kinsela probably has a strong case for his rights being violated based on my superior knowledge that they use the 4th/1st to retaliate and silence critiques of ethics problems in the local courts.(Mine's not the only one) Also, McConnell has been dancing close to the flames of JAMS/felons for decades. If you know the history of the SD Presiding Judge Michael Greer RICO matter from the 90's, you would know what I mean. Judy was Asst PJ of the Superior Court at the time. She submitted an affidavit to the Comm on Judicial Performance (CJP) on behalf of one of the later convicted judges. Judge Malkis, Adams and Atty Frega went to jail. Greer turned states evidence to avoid jail. He went to work for JAMS. McConnell was appointed to the 4th/1st. It's rumored she was FBI investigated in the Greer matter.(See Depak Chopra's attorney's accusations circa 2000) She became CJP Chair. So unless you can explain why I have: 1. an unvacated-void-on-its-face-back-dated judgment that concealed I was a trial prevailing party; and 2. a back-dated lien which states an entry of judgment date that is not possible to have occurred; and 3. repeated denials from the 4th/1st to recall/rescind their 2010 remittitur so those fraudulent docs can be vacated -- then please don't judge me as not wisely picking battles. To understand how the greater fraud continues by Judy McConnell's unclean hands; watch this presentation I gave at conference last Nov. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJc5bKVUZ9k I scored against the fraud last year -- but it's not enough to shut it down completely w/o McConnell being prosecuted for case-fixing SLAPP to keep it going. http://www.wondermakers.com/Portals/0/ACOEM%20Aba…— July 16, 2016 2:46 p.m.
Prominent entrepreneur sues prominent judge
Justice Judith McConnell is bad news. In November 2015, I filed a complaint against her with the USDOJ for her concealment of falsified court documents in Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation. For six years, the California Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP) has had the clear and convincing evidence of her case-fixing. When I first complained to them in 2010, she was chairwoman of the CJP. Cover letter to my USDOJ complaint against McConnell. https://katysexposure.files.wordpress.com/2015/10…— July 15, 2016 10:24 p.m.
County worker felonies unreported by D.A.
Things that make you go Hmmmm. Is there anyone in Bonnie's office who might lose their pensions for committing felonies?— June 20, 2015 10:46 a.m.
Who told the feds about Azano? Bob Brewer, that’s who.
FYI, The third candidate for San Diego District Attorney is Terri Wyatt. I don't know much about her, but do see from her site that the Honorable Judge Victor Rimerez (retired) appears to have good things to say of her. I respect his opinion. http://terriwyattforda.com/2014/node/2 Speaking of endorsements, Bonnie Dumanis appears to be handing them out all over the county and racking up quite a few for herself. I think that's great. All I have to do is look on a candidate's website to see if they are proudly displaying the Dumanis endorsement, or look on her website to see if a candidate is endorsing her. If they are, then I know its probably wise to vote for the other person running for same office.— March 20, 2014 11:03 p.m.
O.B. Rag Takes Stand on Publishing Location of Dumanis Fundraiser
It would seem the Spoons have misdirected their anger. The OBRag didn't publish their address for the private fundraiser. Ms. Dumanis published it on her website. Since this was a private fundraiser by invitation only (according the the emails) Dumanis did this apparently in self promotion to let it be known she has supporters. And she apparently did this without the Spoon's knowledge or permission. What is really telling is that the Spoons did not want it to be publicly known that they were holding a fundraiser at their home for Dumanis. It smacks of old guard, local politicians trying to operate behind closed doors.— September 22, 2011 10:36 p.m.