Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Archives
Classifieds
Stories
Events
Contests
Music
Movies
Theater
Food
Legal Guide
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
It's not over. Chargers given time to woo San Diego
I wish some of you folks would run for "clowncil" (thanks for that) and the mere mare (thanks again, but you are offending real mares). When it comes to infrastructure, as soon as the stadium financing is passed, you will see bond issues to rebuild infrastructure that has suffered from neglect while money and attention has been diverted from preventative maintenance. At first, these projects will be "cheap" billion-dollar patches which will soon fail, leading to more bonds, leading to more bonds ad infinitum, because to replace the poorly-done work of the past would cost marginally more (or sometimes less, but "money-saving" will be what is crowed about). This does not include privately-owned utilities who will charge their victims for the same kind of scheme at the corporate level. Watch--all ratepayers will pay for the poisoning of Porter Ranch and beyond, not to mention the effect on the ozone shield.— January 15, 2016 12:59 p.m.
It's not over. Chargers given time to woo San Diego
That's a true hero.— January 15, 2016 12:40 p.m.
It's not over. Chargers given time to woo San Diego
How you survived all those years in the San Diego Onion is some kinda miracle. To be a hero, you must suffer mightily, I guess.— January 14, 2016 5:31 p.m.
It's not over. Chargers given time to woo San Diego
Mendicants--does that mean they can't mend?— January 14, 2016 5:28 p.m.
It's not over. Chargers given time to woo San Diego
The purpose was PRIMARILY to put pressure on San Diego voters to subsidize a new Chargers stadium. In a "special" election, most voters will be rabid, pumped up by TV (KUSI is the worst) propaganda. It's hard to get "NO" voters out.— January 14, 2016 9:58 a.m.
It's not over. Chargers given time to woo San Diego
CORRECT! But why is it that only you shout this from the rooftop of your doghouse?— January 14, 2016 9:40 a.m.
Chargers head opposed to Inglewood move
That's just a start. Even when they spend on infrastructure, they out-source as much as they can. As you whisper, "Follow the money."— January 13, 2016 8:30 p.m.
Dr. Robert Frank Mansueto: “Guaranteed growth rate.” Hmm...
Mr. Bauder, did you reveal your identity at the beginning of your call, so he was on guard or were you anonymous and he slowly clammed up because of the increasing quality of your questions--which no patsy would think of asking?— January 13, 2016 8:22 p.m.
It's not over. Chargers given time to woo San Diego
I resent every second that the Mayor spends on anything but public health and safety, especially including the time staff at all levels spend on non-governmental issues. Just what in the City Charter authorizes such squandering of taxpayer money on private business? What justification is there for diverting resources from public health and safety to such scheming?— January 13, 2016 8:08 p.m.
Their son died in jail
At least not on this issue.— January 13, 2016 8:01 p.m.