Maria Severson. Mike Aguirre and Severson won a verdict against the city’s creation of a Maintenance Assessment District their clients didn’t want to be part of.
  • Maria Severson. Mike Aguirre and Severson won a verdict against the city’s creation of a Maintenance Assessment District their clients didn’t want to be part of.
  • From You Tube
  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

San Diego city officials confirmed that the city has suspended the creation of Maintenance Assessment Districts — but couldn’t find any documentation of that policy shift during the more than four weeks they searched after it was requested.

Mike Aguirre. The city attorney confirmed they will seek new trial in case they lost to Aguirre and Severson.

From You Tube

They finally remembered that it is new policy late last week after a city staffer who talked about the memo in a community meeting told her boss a reporter called her to ask for it. In less than 24 hours, Economic Development Director Erik Caldwell confirmed the change in a written statement.

Journalists' survey. City employees have confirmed that they have been instructed not to talk to reporters and many say they are afraid of retaliation if they do.

San Diego Society of Professional Journalists

More than a dozen city employees have confirmed that they have been instructed not to talk to reporters and many say they are afraid of retaliation if they do, even though they are allowed to talk with other citizens and residents. Questions and messages from reporters must go to the city’s Communications Department or to the city’s NextRequest system, which failed to find any documents that suspend the use of maintenance assessment districts.

The NextRequest system has become a concern for local journalists who see it as an obstacle to getting information the public is entitled to. An informal survey by the Society of Professional Journalists found that half the reporters surveyed are dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with the system’s response and 19 of 30 reported that responses didn’t arrive before the reporters’ deadlines.

The assessment districts are set up to tax an area like a neighborhood to pay for special services and features. They’re a common tool in business districts – the city counts 57 existing districts where residents, businesses and property owners have voted to tax themselves for services and improvements.

In December, Mike Aguirre and Maria Severson won a verdict against the city’s creation of a Maintenance Assessment District their clients didn’t want to be part of. The judge ruled that the proposed district in La Jolla planned to provide services that look a lot like the services the city is required to perform.

Assessment districts can only be used for services above and beyond those that are city obligations. So people can’t be taxed for services like cleaning sidewalks, street sweeping, disposing of trash, and maintaining city landscaping, according to the ruling.

In January, sources said that at least twice, city staffers had told groups about a memo freezing plans for new assessment districts because of the verdict.

By the end of January, the city attorney had confirmed they will seek a new trial in the case they lost to Aguirre and Severson.

In February, I asked city officials for a copy of the memo — and to not have the request routed through the city’s NextRequest system. The system is supposed to be a tool to satisfy public records act requests.

Reporters have been told that using the NextRequest system is not mandatory. (That is consistent with the state public records act, which trumps policies that slow the process down, according to former California First Amendment lawyer Terry Franke.)

Reporters try to avoid the system after experiences of strange decisions to black out information, the long slow process and because the documents are eventually received from the offices and departments without any explanation of what the information means or its context. And the documents come from the very same city staff that reporters would have asked without the torturous, slow route.

My February 6 request includes the language “But not through NextRequest, which the mayor has indicated is a route people can opt out of as I am doing here.”

My entire request was copied and pasted in the NextRequest opened by a city employee the city declined to identify. At least four phone messages to Public Records Administration Program Manager Jacqueline Palmer received no response.

From there, the unwanted NextRequest went to the mayor’s office, city council offices, the city attorney, Economic Development and then to Parks and Recreation. It was closed on Mar. 7 by NextRequest staff, saying the city has no responsive documents.

But a quick call to the city staffer who, sources said, had spoken about the memo to a business group trigger a response in less than 24 hours. Her boss went to the city communications office to send this message:

“Due to ongoing litigation the City is not moving forward with the formation of new maintenance assessment districts at this time,” attributed to Erik Caldwell, the director of the Economic Development department, which was included in the NextRequest.

The city continues to maintain that there are no documents supporting this policy change.

What the freeze means isn’t clear for the existing Maintenance Assessment Districts. Plaintiff’s attorney Severson said that the verdict really only applies to the La Jolla district. But in the process of planning many city projects and some with SANDAG, planners often tell residents that setting up an assessment districts to maintain city infrastructure is the best path.

  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

Comments

Cassander March 22, 2018 @ 7:02 p.m.

As I've commented before, even when you know what you're looking for exists, there's no enforcement mechanism to compel performance. The idea that this moratorium, a major city-wide policy directive, happened without some kind of paper or electronic trail, is simply not credible.

But this does prove that the NextRequest initiative by Kev-boy is like all of his other 'actions'—no substance, just spin.

1

dwbat March 23, 2018 @ 5:54 a.m.

Kev got his "flack" training with a slick PR firm before he entered politics.

0

martygraham619 March 23, 2018 @ 12:57 a.m.

None

Ms. Severson also looks like this: a smart, skilled lawyer.

4

ebartl March 23, 2018 @ 1:35 p.m.

Four months ago I called a city park manager to ask questions about various city park amenities, how they are managed, and procedures for getting permission to use parks for various reasons. He began answering my questions until I mentioned the article I was working on. He then told me to cross out everything he told me and to contact the Communications Dept. Communications delayed responding several times. Four months later they still have not answered my questions.

1

dwbat March 25, 2018 @ 8:45 a.m.

The City wants very tight control over release of information. They do not believe in transparency, in spite of what they claim. And Communications Director Katie Keach is largely responsible for the decline. She learned about obfuscation when she worked as PR person for then-Councilmember Todd Gloria. So naturally she got promoted!

1

nostalgic March 23, 2018 @ 1:48 p.m.

A reminder that the city has had TWO Maintenance Assessment Districts overturned - the Golden Hill MAD case also prevailed on behalf of a community group, the Golden Hill Neighborhood Association (GHNA). This Superior Court decision was appealed, and the Appeals Court also ruled in behalf of GHNA. Only then was the Golden Hill MAD was dissolved.

1

martygraham619 March 26, 2018 @ 5:40 p.m.

Yup, right here: https://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2...

Looks like the people who were taxed may not have gotten refunds.

1

AlexClarke March 25, 2018 @ 7:05 a.m.

Maintenance Assessment Districts sound like a way for the city to get paid twice for doing what they are supposed to be doing.

0

dwbat March 26, 2018 @ 8:31 p.m.

From the famous line in the movie "Network": "I'm MAD as hell, and I'm not going to take it anymore!"

0

martygraham619 March 28, 2018 @ 12:34 p.m.

I just found this, at about the same time I heard there was a memo, Del Cerro did too. So that's a city council office and the economic development department - both of which were queried by NextRequest and said they had nothing.

from the Del Cerro Action Council blog:

Update on the Proposed Maintenance Assessment District for Del Cerro Posted on February 9, 2018 by delcerroactioncouncil Good afternoon all:

Mark Rawlins, who has been keeping us updated on the status of the proposed Maintenance Assessment District just sent out the following information for everyone’s reference and referral. Everything is on hold – city-wide.

(an update from Mark Rawlins) Del Cerro Neighbors, It has been a while since I have provided an update. The good news is we have made progress, but the bad news is the process is currently on hold. The City completed the Engineers report and we were expecting to have our final meeting with the City on January 12th. The goal for the meeting was to review the Engineer’s report, make any last minute edits and then get the petition approved so we could begin the signature drive. However, the ruling on the lawsuit over the newly established La Jolla MAD came back against the City. Apparently the City did not show enough distinction between general benefits (the services the City is currently providing) and the special benefits (The services the property owners would pay for from the assessments.) With that being said, the City’s plan for now is to hold formations moving forward (Del Cerro is one of them) until the City has a ruling on a potential re-trial for the La Jolla lawsuit. Unfortunately we won’t know if the City will be granted a re-trial until early March. So for now we are standing by. I will keep you posted. Once this is resolved, we will be back on track. Below are the links of two articles from the San Diego Union Tribune on the law suit. http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/watchdog/sd-me-tax-district-20171204-story.html http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/watchdog/sd-me-new-trial-20180124-story.html

0

Sign in to comment

Get $5 off any Reader event

Sign up for our email list to get your promo code

Close