Anchor ads are not supported on this page.

4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs

North Park Jack in the Box court case surprise

"I am not going to subject my clients to abusive depositions by Mr. Briggs."

Jack in the Box, at the intersection of 30th and Upas streets, before the rebuild, in 2012. - Image by Alan Decker
Jack in the Box, at the intersection of 30th and Upas streets, before the rebuild, in 2012.

San Diego Superior Court judge Gregory Pollack ruled today that a complete overhaul of the North Park Jack in the Box was within the scope of the permit. The ruling should put to rest what has been a four-year-long legal battle.

In 2013, a group of residents calling itself the North Park Preservation Coalition sued the city for allowing Jack in the Box to demolish its restaurant located at Upas and 30th streets and construct a new building, despite current zoning that forbids drive-thrus at that location.

THE HISTORY

In 2011, Jack in the Box submitted a proposal to the city to rebuild the 35-year-old restaurant. The company planned to add 234 square feet, extend the drive-thru, and build outdoor seating. Neighbors, however, opposed the plan. They said the proposal would increase traffic, noise, and litter. But most importantly, it was illegal under the city's municipal code. In fact, the city council changed the zoning in 2000 to prevent new drive-thru restaurants from being built in the area. Because it was built before the zoning changes took effect, the Jack in the Box could remain, but only if the restaurant did not close for an extended period of time and if no major rebuild of the restaurant occurred.

Sponsored
Sponsored

The company ditched the proposal and opted to remodel the existing restaurant.

In May 2013, the burger chain obtained permits to renovate the existing restaurant. To ease the neighbors’ concerns, then–construction manager Mike Hogeboom sent a letter to the planning group informing them that the company would not "demolish any exterior walls."

Not long after, residents saw that the restaurant had been completely demolished, save for a handful of studs.

The residents complained of the rebuild to then-mayor Bob Filner. Filner attempted to issue a stop order but had failed to clear it with the city attorney's office before construction began. Filner backed off. The residents then filed a lawsuit in August 2013.

THE LEGAL FIGHT

The neighbors hired attorney Cory Briggs to represent them. In January 2015, judge Ronald Prager found that the group had not filed the lawsuit within 90 days of the permit and was a few days late, thus barring the lawsuit from moving forward.

Briggs and the North Park Preservation Coalition appealed. Last year the appellate court ruled that in fact the statute of limitations had not expired and the lawsuit was sent back to trial court.

Today (September 25), Briggs, deputy city attorney Jana Will, and an attorney for Jack in the Box appeared before judge Gregory Pollack.

After beginning the hearing, Pollack immediately informed the attorneys that he believed the permit allowed for exterior walls to be demolished. He stated that during the course of the remodel crews were forced to demolish additional walls due to dry-rot, which was all within the scope of the permit.

Briggs argued that Pollack would have no way of knowing the scope of the permit because neither the city or Jack in the Box ever produced the original permit, only a revised copy of one. In addition, said Briggs, the company's own construction manager had informed the residents that no exterior walls would be demolished, meaning that the walls were torn down after the permit had been issued.

Deputy attorney Will stated that the city only keeps electronic versions and was not aware if the city had the original plans.

Briggs asked that the judge allow him to depose city workers to testify on the permit process and whether copies of the plans and permits exist.

A judge asked deputy attorney Will whether she would agree. She did not.

"I am not going to subject my clients to abusive depositions by Mr. Briggs," said Will. "This case would never end if we did and Mr. Briggs would continue to raise different issues at the last minute.”

After the hearing, Briggs said his clients had not decided whether to file an appeal.

The latest copy of the Reader

Please enjoy this clickable Reader flipbook. Linked text and ads are flash-highlighted in blue for your convenience. To enhance your viewing, please open full screen mode by clicking the icon on the far right of the black flipbook toolbar.

Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all
Previous article

Clikatat Ikatowi returns to the Casbah for October 8 show

Venue saw the band’s last performance over a quarter century ago
Next Article

A rope course designed to resemble the Giant Dipper at Belmont Part

Maruta Gardner Playground - a parent's playground
Jack in the Box, at the intersection of 30th and Upas streets, before the rebuild, in 2012. - Image by Alan Decker
Jack in the Box, at the intersection of 30th and Upas streets, before the rebuild, in 2012.

San Diego Superior Court judge Gregory Pollack ruled today that a complete overhaul of the North Park Jack in the Box was within the scope of the permit. The ruling should put to rest what has been a four-year-long legal battle.

In 2013, a group of residents calling itself the North Park Preservation Coalition sued the city for allowing Jack in the Box to demolish its restaurant located at Upas and 30th streets and construct a new building, despite current zoning that forbids drive-thrus at that location.

THE HISTORY

In 2011, Jack in the Box submitted a proposal to the city to rebuild the 35-year-old restaurant. The company planned to add 234 square feet, extend the drive-thru, and build outdoor seating. Neighbors, however, opposed the plan. They said the proposal would increase traffic, noise, and litter. But most importantly, it was illegal under the city's municipal code. In fact, the city council changed the zoning in 2000 to prevent new drive-thru restaurants from being built in the area. Because it was built before the zoning changes took effect, the Jack in the Box could remain, but only if the restaurant did not close for an extended period of time and if no major rebuild of the restaurant occurred.

Sponsored
Sponsored

The company ditched the proposal and opted to remodel the existing restaurant.

In May 2013, the burger chain obtained permits to renovate the existing restaurant. To ease the neighbors’ concerns, then–construction manager Mike Hogeboom sent a letter to the planning group informing them that the company would not "demolish any exterior walls."

Not long after, residents saw that the restaurant had been completely demolished, save for a handful of studs.

The residents complained of the rebuild to then-mayor Bob Filner. Filner attempted to issue a stop order but had failed to clear it with the city attorney's office before construction began. Filner backed off. The residents then filed a lawsuit in August 2013.

THE LEGAL FIGHT

The neighbors hired attorney Cory Briggs to represent them. In January 2015, judge Ronald Prager found that the group had not filed the lawsuit within 90 days of the permit and was a few days late, thus barring the lawsuit from moving forward.

Briggs and the North Park Preservation Coalition appealed. Last year the appellate court ruled that in fact the statute of limitations had not expired and the lawsuit was sent back to trial court.

Today (September 25), Briggs, deputy city attorney Jana Will, and an attorney for Jack in the Box appeared before judge Gregory Pollack.

After beginning the hearing, Pollack immediately informed the attorneys that he believed the permit allowed for exterior walls to be demolished. He stated that during the course of the remodel crews were forced to demolish additional walls due to dry-rot, which was all within the scope of the permit.

Briggs argued that Pollack would have no way of knowing the scope of the permit because neither the city or Jack in the Box ever produced the original permit, only a revised copy of one. In addition, said Briggs, the company's own construction manager had informed the residents that no exterior walls would be demolished, meaning that the walls were torn down after the permit had been issued.

Deputy attorney Will stated that the city only keeps electronic versions and was not aware if the city had the original plans.

Briggs asked that the judge allow him to depose city workers to testify on the permit process and whether copies of the plans and permits exist.

A judge asked deputy attorney Will whether she would agree. She did not.

"I am not going to subject my clients to abusive depositions by Mr. Briggs," said Will. "This case would never end if we did and Mr. Briggs would continue to raise different issues at the last minute.”

After the hearing, Briggs said his clients had not decided whether to file an appeal.

Comments
Sponsored

The latest copy of the Reader

Please enjoy this clickable Reader flipbook. Linked text and ads are flash-highlighted in blue for your convenience. To enhance your viewing, please open full screen mode by clicking the icon on the far right of the black flipbook toolbar.

Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all
Previous article

Roll-over crashes crop up in San Diego and Baja

Nails, beer, Coca-Cola, Mexican pop singer Luis Miguel's stage equipment
Next Article

When Rafael Payare met with Irwin Jacobs

The new Music Center is a heavenly hall
Comments
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed Big Screen — Movie commentary Blurt — Music's inside track Booze News — San Diego spirits Classical Music — Immortal beauty Classifieds — Free and easy Cover Stories — Front-page features Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts Feast! — Food & drink reviews Feature Stories — Local news & stories Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore From the Archives — Spotlight on the past Golden Dreams — Talk of the town The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it Letters — Our inbox Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news News Ticker — News & politics Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated Poetry — The old and the new Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers Reading — The hunt for intellectuals Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds SD on the QT — Almost factual news Sheep and Goats — Places of worship Special Issues — The best of Street Style — San Diego streets have style Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves Theater — On stage in San Diego this week Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads Your Week — Daily event picks
4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs
Close

Anchor ads are not supported on this page.

This Week’s Reader This Week’s Reader