• Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

On Wednesday, October 19, San Diego County supervisors will consider whether to approve a proposal to transform 1416 acres of untouched wilderness in Julian into 24 residential properties called Hoskings Ranch II.

They will consider the development, as reported by the Reader in June of this year, despite warnings from the State of California's Department of Conservation that approving the project could be illegal.

Local residents have criticized the proposal from Colorado-based Genesee Properties Incorporated and accused county staff and supervisors of kowtowing to the development company's owner (Linden Blue, who along with his brother James Neal Blue own General Atomics)[2], San Diego County's largest defense contractor.

Residents say that Genesee is taking advantage of state tax credits included in the Williamson Act which reward rural landowners for preserving open space by providing major tax breaks. At the same time,

however, the act requires the developer to enter into long-term contracts. In order to exit the program the developer must give notification which begins a ten-year long process wherein the tax breaks are reduced.

Tax records show that in 2006 Blue received a $36,000 tax break for preserving the land.

But Blue, with the county's permission, wants it both ways. The developer is asking supervisors to adjust the minimum lot sizes required by the Williamson Act from 160-acre parcels to 40 acres in order to allow him to continue to collect the tax breaks while selling off the land for a profit.

In a February 2016 letter, the Department of Conservation notified the county that the project violated the Williamson Act.

“The proposed subdivision of contracted land has no relevance to the existing commercial agricultural use of the land: therefore, the imminent residential development which will follow this subdivision cannot be considered incidental. …[T]he department finds the proposed subdivision inconsistent with the Williamson Act and the Subdivision Map Act,” read the letter.

Despite the warning the county's planning commission approved subdividing the property. That decision has now come to the full board for final approval.

Residents of Julian have objected to the development since it first surfaced in 2003 and have been steadfast in their opposition. They formed the Julian Action Committee to try and raise awareness.

The group believes the development will create additional traffic, obstruct views, and deplete natural resources. Making matters worse, the group objects to the fact that the billionaire developer and new tenants will be allowed to forego paying taxes which would normally help pay for public services.

“A billionaire will continue to receive tax breaks and be able to get that much more profit by promising prospective owners nominal property tax bills while our small community struggles to provide public safety and public works services to them,” resident Brian Kramer told the Reader in June 2016.

Residents have hinted that they would be willing to file a lawsuit to challenge the development. It appears as if the county will be prepared to fight the suit.

Included in the October 19 vote is a motion that would force Blue and Genessee Properties to indemnify the county if a lawsuit is filed.

Reads the agenda item, "Require the [Genessee Properties] to enter into a Defense and Indemnification Agreement with the county...and authorize the Director of [Planning and Development Services] to execute the agreement. If litigation is filed challenging the board's action on this project, require Genesee properties, Inc. to provide security in the amount of $750,000.00 in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit or bond..."

The board will hear the item during the 9am meeting at the County Administration Building.

  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

Comments

Herkimer Oct. 14, 2016 @ 1:39 p.m.

When are the citizens of this City,County, and/or Country going to throw their windows open and yell as loud as possible, "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!" ???

1

dwbat Oct. 14, 2016 @ 2:09 p.m.

I'm sure a lot of readers don't even know where that great line came from. It's 40 years old, and from an excellent movie.

0

JustWondering Oct. 14, 2016 @ 8:54 p.m.

I agree....so let's show them...https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AS4aiA17YsM You can skip first minute of the clip, but then pay close attention to the words. And then think....they apply more today then they did 40 years ago.

1

Visduh Oct. 15, 2016 @ 9:25 a.m.

Regardless of where the phrase originated, it was used to telling effect by Howard Jarvis in the passage of Prop. 13 in 1978.

The Blue(s) brothers are maybe the greediest pair, and the most obnoxious too, that most of us will encounter. Everything they do, and especially where it involves development of vacant property, seems to rankle the neighbors, and end up in a fight. Does Linden really need to keep a few thousand dollars of tax abatement? Might it be possible to develop that ranch and make the Julian neighbors proud?

At their ages, it's time for he and Neal to start thinking about how they will be remembered. I'd think they would prefer to have a positive memory, rather than as a pair of greedy, rapacious, land-destroying developers of mediocre facilities. But that doesn't look like what will happen.

0

SportsFan0000 Oct. 16, 2016 @ 2:08 p.m.

Out of control greedy people who feel entitled and that the laws apply to everyone else and not to them. So, they will buy off the County Planning Department. Then, they will buy off the County Board of Supervisors despite the fact that the State of California's Conservation Department has already ruled that the project violates The Williamson Act?! Then, they will clog up the Courts with litigation since they are wealthy billionaires they feel that they can bully Julian residents and the County of San Diego and the Judiciary into letting them have their way.
The Blue Bros and General Atomics are not just entitled to do what ever the heck they want with any land in California. If they want to build willy/nilly with absolutely no zoning and no restraints on what they put on their land and how non conforming the uses, then they should be buying and building in some place like Texas where zoning is often a bad joke...

And, why is the County Board of Supervisors set to approve a project that they know most likely will end up in a lengthy litigation process?! $750K may not cover it if the litigation drags on for years as expected....And, it will be County of San Diego taxpayers footing the bill..

0

Visduh Oct. 16, 2016 @ 5:58 p.m.

You and other readers may want to study the huge fight that Neal Blue had in Telluride, Colorado. From what I can gather, he lost and lost big in the Colorado courts. The controversy sounds rather everyday, unless you've been to Telluride. The topography of the area makes all the difference. But again, he had the attitude that since he owned the land, it was his to do with as he pleased. And Telluride was a hot spot for the "in" group and skiers, so it was all the more compelling for him to pull it off. The problem was that if he did it, Telluride would cease to be the unique spot that it is, and be reduced to just another Colorado ski resort town.

0

dwbat Oct. 16, 2016 @ 3:57 p.m.

"The point is, ladies and gentleman, that greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right, greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit." --Gordon Gekko, "Wall Street"

0

Sign in to comment

Win a $25 Gift Card to
The Broken Yolk Cafe

Join our newsletter list

Each newsletter subscription means another chance to win!

Close