• Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

On Saturday, October 2, 2010, the Sialoi family held a barbecue in front of their apartment to celebrate the seventh birthday of a family member. (The lawsuit does not indicate in which San Diego neighborhood the incident took place.)

No alcohol was served. Around 10:20 p.m. the apartment manager called 911 and reported that two black or Samoan men were ducking around the apartment complex. One carried a handgun and the other a shotgun, according to the report.

Before long, more than 20 San Diego police were on the scene, many with arms drawn. But the two black men were nowhere to be found.

One of the teenagers was holding a plastic paintball gun in his hand. When he saw the officers, he dropped it. A policeman confirmed the gun was a toy. But the other policemen handcuffed three teenagers and herded them into a police car. Then the officers began to detain, search, and handcuff members of the Sialoi family.

Several officers entered and searched the Sialois' apartment without a warrant or consent. The family sued the City of San Diego and the police officers individually. The district court gave the city qualified immunity but denied it to the officers. The officers appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth District considered the appeal, taking the facts "in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs."

The appellate panel, in a decision filed May 24, said the police were not entitled to summary judgment. Once the police found that the gun was a toy, they should not have handcuffed family members and shoved them to the ground or into a police vehicle, ruled the panel.

The officers "acted wholly unreasonably in using extreme force to disrupt a peaceful birthday party for a seven-year-old girl," said the appellate court. Furthermore, "No reasonable officer would have thought it lawful to search the Sialois' apartment," said the appellate panel, affirming the trial court's decision.

  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

Comments

laplayaheritage May 27, 2016 @ 4:04 p.m.

Published on Feb 5, 2016. City of San Diego police officers appeal from the denial of qualified immunity in an action brought by Edward Sialoi and other family members alleging that they were detained and unlawfully arrested at their apartment complex.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOGK3-X8eP4

0

Don Bauder May 28, 2016 @ 8:49 a.m.

laplayaheritage: The youtube of the appeal hearing is quite enlightening. Best, Don Bauder

0

Flapper May 28, 2016 @ 11:52 a.m.

The video apparently did not include the decision.

0

Don Bauder May 28, 2016 @ 7:22 p.m.

Flapper: As I said in the story, the decision was filed May 24. I am not aware that it was made public before that. Best, Don Bauder

0

MichaelValentine May 29, 2016 @ 1:56 p.m.

With 20 cops showing up there must have been a supervisor among them. He or she needs to be gotten rid of if they don't have a basic understanding of the fourth amendment. Such abuse of a citizens' rights should be a costly event for the police and the city.

0

Don Bauder May 29, 2016 @ 3:16 p.m.

MichaelValentine: Yes, there was an officer in charge. His role is discussed by the judges in the youtube. Best, Don Bauder

0

jnojr May 31, 2016 @ 3:18 p.m.

"The police" never pay a dime. Why should the taxpayers write a check? A judgment for bad deeds should be paid by the INDIVIDUAL(s) who performed the bad deeds. Even by union members.

0

Don Bauder June 1, 2016 @ 6:12 a.m.

jnojr: It's the same throughout our society. Individuals don't pay for wrongdoing. Institutions pay. Best, Don Bauder

0

Sign in to comment

Get $5 off any Reader event

Sign up for our email list to get your promo code

Close