4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs

Carmel Valley residents displeased with limbo

City council postpones decision on Kilroy Realty's One Paseo plan

One Paseo conceptual illustration
One Paseo conceptual illustration

At a May 18 hearing, San Diego's city councilmembers postponed a decision on whether to rescind their approval of Kilroy Realty's 1.45-million-square-foot mixed-use project, One Paseo, or send it to the ballot at taxpayer cost.

Councilmembers have done their best to toe the line between kowtowing to the developer and going with residents. Rescinding the approval would have meant lengthy delays for the developer; sending it to the ballot would have cost the taxpayers over a million dollars.

Instead, at the outset of the meeting, councilmember David Alvarez dropped a bombshell: Alvarez asked to continue the meeting until Thursday, May 21, in order to give Kilroy Realty and Donahue Schriber time to hash out a deal. Donahue Schriber, the company that owns Del Mar Highlands Shopping Center, put up the money behind the referendum drive that more that 61,000 residents signed in an effort to overturn the council's earlier approval.

The two developers have since filed dueling lawsuits, also naming the City of San Diego.

Alvarez indicated that Kilroy was willing to cut the average daily trips on nearby roads in half, in exchange for a green light from the city.

Councilmembers were largely supportive of continuing the item and of the negotiations.

"It's unfortunate that you had to come downtown and pay the money to park," said District 5 representative Mark Kersey. "It's inconvenient. We’ve heard from a number of people in the community that they just wanted a different development. What we are hearing now is there may be a possibility for that to happen. We all know this land is not going to sit empty; it will be developed."

Residents in attendance, many of whom have fought Kilroy's plans for years, were not as thrilled. Many questioned the council's authority to accept a compromise between the two while neglecting the referendum drive.

The group of residents later issued a statement on the delay and possible compromise.

“We are disappointed the council fails to recognize the urgency of its action and is continuing to leave the community in limbo. For six years, San Diegans have worked to have their concerns regarding One Paseo heard and addressed. To date, these concerns have been pushed aside by Kilroy and the City Council. With the referendum to overturn the project’s approval now certified, the time for the Council to listen to its constituents has past.

“San Diegans are ready to put this issue behind them once and for all or move forward to the next step in the process. The council’s decision to delay its action on the referendum shows a disregard for the community and the time it has spent on this issue.”

The council will meet inside council chambers at 1 p.m. Thursday to make their final decision.

See these stories for more information:

May 16, 2012

February 3, 2015

Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all

Previous article

The funkier, groove-orientated side

The New Regime, Tolan Shaw, Scott Samuels, Satanic Planet, Putrescine
Next Article

Pretty in pink, the drink

“Spicy and approachable, but fun and different”
One Paseo conceptual illustration
One Paseo conceptual illustration

At a May 18 hearing, San Diego's city councilmembers postponed a decision on whether to rescind their approval of Kilroy Realty's 1.45-million-square-foot mixed-use project, One Paseo, or send it to the ballot at taxpayer cost.

Councilmembers have done their best to toe the line between kowtowing to the developer and going with residents. Rescinding the approval would have meant lengthy delays for the developer; sending it to the ballot would have cost the taxpayers over a million dollars.

Instead, at the outset of the meeting, councilmember David Alvarez dropped a bombshell: Alvarez asked to continue the meeting until Thursday, May 21, in order to give Kilroy Realty and Donahue Schriber time to hash out a deal. Donahue Schriber, the company that owns Del Mar Highlands Shopping Center, put up the money behind the referendum drive that more that 61,000 residents signed in an effort to overturn the council's earlier approval.

The two developers have since filed dueling lawsuits, also naming the City of San Diego.

Alvarez indicated that Kilroy was willing to cut the average daily trips on nearby roads in half, in exchange for a green light from the city.

Councilmembers were largely supportive of continuing the item and of the negotiations.

"It's unfortunate that you had to come downtown and pay the money to park," said District 5 representative Mark Kersey. "It's inconvenient. We’ve heard from a number of people in the community that they just wanted a different development. What we are hearing now is there may be a possibility for that to happen. We all know this land is not going to sit empty; it will be developed."

Residents in attendance, many of whom have fought Kilroy's plans for years, were not as thrilled. Many questioned the council's authority to accept a compromise between the two while neglecting the referendum drive.

The group of residents later issued a statement on the delay and possible compromise.

“We are disappointed the council fails to recognize the urgency of its action and is continuing to leave the community in limbo. For six years, San Diegans have worked to have their concerns regarding One Paseo heard and addressed. To date, these concerns have been pushed aside by Kilroy and the City Council. With the referendum to overturn the project’s approval now certified, the time for the Council to listen to its constituents has past.

“San Diegans are ready to put this issue behind them once and for all or move forward to the next step in the process. The council’s decision to delay its action on the referendum shows a disregard for the community and the time it has spent on this issue.”

The council will meet inside council chambers at 1 p.m. Thursday to make their final decision.

See these stories for more information:

May 16, 2012

February 3, 2015

Sponsored
Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all
Previous article

Hops On The Harbor: Pizza Port Brewing Company, Morning Glory Brunch Frog Race

Events April 16-April 21, 2021
Next Article

Where the author of Corpus of Joe Bailey created fictional residents of Mission Hills

The house hearkens back to an era of craftsmanship markedly superior to modern construction.
Comments
3

Dorian,

You left out the other Petition for a Writ of Mandate by three resident groups.

Residents, not Donahue Schriber control the referendum. Kilroy needs these groups to sign off, too.

Your article seems to adopt the Kilroy "talking point" that this is just a struggle between two big developers. Why?

Residents who have worked for free for five years to oppose this project resent that mischaracterization.

Some of these same residents fought the Del Mar Heights Town Center twenty years ago because of its density. This is a nice community only because of these activists who have saved it from the jaws of greedy developers.

Kilroy should be happy to get twice their entitlement. It is not our job to bail them out. Spot zoning for special interests violates the community planning board system and comprehensive urban and transportational planning efforts.

If the City Council wants increased density, they have to pay for public transit to support it, unless we get solar-powered vehicles with zero emissions. That law is made in Sacramento to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

We are wise to City Councilmembers who say one thing and then vote another way, like David Alvarez did. He now hopes that a resolution by negotiation will save his political career.

May 19, 2015

"Kilroy was willing to cut the average daily trips on nearby roads" Oh yea I'll buy that. Just how is the developer going to cut daily trips? Unless and until they build a fence around Carmel Valley with guarded gates and private roads people will drive on any road they chose to.

May 20, 2015

This "trip reduction deal" is nothing more than a wink and a nod between a potential BIG DONOR and all the City Council members (that want as many donations as they can get), that if they all play nice and vote for the Kilroy project, Kilroy will not forget them when they ask/need help.

If the City Council does not delay this vote until all the residents have had their say, then what it means is that our City Council will rubber stamp any project that Big Donors want. No matter what the residents or City Code says.

May 20, 2015

Sign in to comment

Sign in

Art Reviews — W.S. Di Piero's eye on exhibits Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed Best Buys — San Diego shopping Big Screen — Movie commentary Blurt — Music's inside track Booze News — San Diego spirits City Lights — News and politics Classical Music — Immortal beauty Classifieds — Free and easy Cover Stories — Front-page features Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts Famous Former Neighbors — Next-door celebs Feast! — Food & drink reviews Feature Stories — Local news & stories From the Archives — Spotlight on the past Golden Dreams — Talk of the town Here's the Deal — Chad Deal's watering holes Just Announced — The scoop on shows Letters — Our inbox [email protected] — Local movie buffs share favorites Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news News Ticker — News & politics Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated Of Note — Concert picks Out & About — What's Happening Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated Poetry — The old and the new Pour Over — Grab a cup Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers Reading — The hunt for intellectuals Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds SD on the QT — Almost factual news Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes Sheep and Goats — Places of worship Special Issues — The best of Sports — Athletics without gush Street Style — San Diego streets have style Suit Up — Fashion tips for dudes Theater Reviews — Local productions Theater antireviews — Narrow your search Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads Waterfront — All things ocean Your Week — Daily event picks
4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs
Close