Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
[email protected] — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Impeachment bragging may bite Goldsmith
Either they had control over Filner or they didn’t
City Attorney Jan Goldsmith took pride, and much credit, for ousting Bob Filner from the mayor's office. After Filner's departure, Goldsmith turned to media outlets and social media sites such as Twitter boasting about the "de-facto impeachment" he helped orchestrate.
Now, those comments may come back to bite Goldsmith, as well as the city he is sworn to defend, in the sexual harassment lawsuit from a wounded Marine veteran and her nurse.
In legal documents filed on March 17, attorneys representing veteran Katherine Ragazzino and her nurse Michelle Tyler request that a jury hear the case.
One of the arguments for doing so is Goldsmith's statements to the press claiming that he and the city were aware of Filner's erratic behavior as early as February 2013. Because Goldsmith's name appears on court documents, argues attorneys, any claims that the city had no control over the mayor's actions are baseless.
According to the initial complaint, Tyler and Ragazzino visited then-mayor Filner at City Hall on June 11, 2013 looking for help in getting Ragazzino disability benefits for the number of injuries, including a traumatic brain injury, spinal cord and nerve damage that she sustained during her tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. Tyler claims their meeting took a wrong turn when Filner "tried to extract sexual favors" in exchange for helping the disabled Marine.
The nurse and former Marine sued the city and Filner in January 2014. Now, as the two sides do the Filner legal dance in court, Goldsmith's statements to the press in the days and weeks following Filner's departure are now coming into play.
"We didn't think he had the willingness or financial ability to deal with the legal issues," the City Attorney told
Los Angeles Times reporter Tony Perry in a November 3, 2013 article. Other statements included: "I understood he needed therapy," and "It was like having the litigant from hell in your courtroom for eight months."
But it was his boasting about a quasi-impeachment that could potentially jeopardize the city's legal position.
"We strategized as lawyers: How were we going to remove the mayor? It was a de facto impeachment," Goldsmith told Perry.
Attorneys for Ragazzino and Tyler believe Goldsmith's willingness to share shows that the city shares some responsibility for Filner's actions.
"Plaintiffs request that the Court take judicial notice of public statements made by city attorney Jan Goldsmith which seemingly contradict the city's current positions in this lawsuit," reads the March 17 legal document.
"For example, the city attorney claimed that he did a 'de facto impeachment' of the mayor. Yet, now the city is claiming that the city had 'no control' over the mayor. Which is it? Impeachment is the ultimate form of control. If the city attorney 'impeached' they mayor, then the city had 'control' over the mayor."
"Here the city attorney's statements to the media are capable of immediate and accurate verification because he is listed as one of five attorneys on the city's demurrer and he can be asked about his statements; when he knew that the mayor needed therapy or was abusive, (according to his statements to the media, February 2013) and whether the city had control over the mayor (according to his statements to the media, yes)."
The two sides will appear before Superior Court Judge Joel Wohlfeil on May 9 to discuss a motion to strike filed by the City.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Impeachment bragging may bite Goldsmith
Either they had control over Filner or they didn’t
Impeachment bragging may bite Goldsmith
Either they had control over Filner or they didn’t
City Attorney Jan Goldsmith took pride, and much credit, for ousting Bob Filner from the mayor's office. After Filner's departure, Goldsmith turned to media outlets and social media sites such as Twitter boasting about the "de-facto impeachment" he helped orchestrate.
Now, those comments may come back to bite Goldsmith, as well as the city he is sworn to defend, in the sexual harassment lawsuit from a wounded Marine veteran and her nurse.
In legal documents filed on March 17, attorneys representing veteran Katherine Ragazzino and her nurse Michelle Tyler request that a jury hear the case.
One of the arguments for doing so is Goldsmith's statements to the press claiming that he and the city were aware of Filner's erratic behavior as early as February 2013. Because Goldsmith's name appears on court documents, argues attorneys, any claims that the city had no control over the mayor's actions are baseless.
According to the initial complaint, Tyler and Ragazzino visited then-mayor Filner at City Hall on June 11, 2013 looking for help in getting Ragazzino disability benefits for the number of injuries, including a traumatic brain injury, spinal cord and nerve damage that she sustained during her tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. Tyler claims their meeting took a wrong turn when Filner "tried to extract sexual favors" in exchange for helping the disabled Marine.
The nurse and former Marine sued the city and Filner in January 2014. Now, as the two sides do the Filner legal dance in court, Goldsmith's statements to the press in the days and weeks following Filner's departure are now coming into play.
"We didn't think he had the willingness or financial ability to deal with the legal issues," the City Attorney told
Los Angeles Times reporter Tony Perry in a November 3, 2013 article. Other statements included: "I understood he needed therapy," and "It was like having the litigant from hell in your courtroom for eight months."
But it was his boasting about a quasi-impeachment that could potentially jeopardize the city's legal position.
"We strategized as lawyers: How were we going to remove the mayor? It was a de facto impeachment," Goldsmith told Perry.
Attorneys for Ragazzino and Tyler believe Goldsmith's willingness to share shows that the city shares some responsibility for Filner's actions.
"Plaintiffs request that the Court take judicial notice of public statements made by city attorney Jan Goldsmith which seemingly contradict the city's current positions in this lawsuit," reads the March 17 legal document.
"For example, the city attorney claimed that he did a 'de facto impeachment' of the mayor. Yet, now the city is claiming that the city had 'no control' over the mayor. Which is it? Impeachment is the ultimate form of control. If the city attorney 'impeached' they mayor, then the city had 'control' over the mayor."
"Here the city attorney's statements to the media are capable of immediate and accurate verification because he is listed as one of five attorneys on the city's demurrer and he can be asked about his statements; when he knew that the mayor needed therapy or was abusive, (according to his statements to the media, February 2013) and whether the city had control over the mayor (according to his statements to the media, yes)."
The two sides will appear before Superior Court Judge Joel Wohlfeil on May 9 to discuss a motion to strike filed by the City.
Comments
A tight wig on a small-brained flunkie will always cause that person to brag about impeachments.
I really appreciate that comment, Justin, it is both funny and true. There's just nothing to add.
I still don't see where the taxpayers of San Diego did anything wrong. If bad deeds were committed, they were committed by INDIVIDUALS. Those individuals should be identified and held personally accountable.
All public entities should be 100% immune from civil torts.
I hope you are joking.
I think the plaintiffs are going to have their own problems based on their own comments quoted in more than one place. Here's a quote posted by La Playa Heritage in comments on a CityBeat article last August and taken from statements made by Gloria Allred. Similar statements were posted in an earlier CityBeat editorial which called on Filner to resign.
The following quote is an analysis by the San Diegans for Mayor Bob Filner Facebook Page. https://www.facebook.com/SanDiegansForMayorBobFilner?hc_location=stream
"Lets take a look at the statements Allred made, since we know the media will not.
1.. After agreeing to help Ragazzino, Filner asked to speak to Tyler alone.
AFTER agreeing to help, not before, not during, no quid pro quo but "after saying he would help."
IF they weren't in his office. Making it clear he wasn't using his office.
3.Tyler told him to stop and said she had to leave, Allred said. As Tyler left the office, the mayor told her, "I'm going to call you."
DID the mayor ever call ??
NO, it appears you owe some of your thanks to the mayor, who helped you without any trade of favors at all.
Once again the mayor flirts, ask a woman out, is rebuffed and he does no follow up on it. Once rebuffed it seems "no" works quite well with the mayor."