Donna Frye and Terry Francke (left), Civic San Diego board of directors, and Kevin Faulconer
  • Donna Frye and Terry Francke (left), Civic San Diego board of directors, and Kevin Faulconer
  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

Civic San Diego: Agree to abide by the state's open-meeting laws or prepare to defend those practices in court. That was the gist of a July 31 cease-and-desist letter from open-government advocacy group Californians Aware (CalAware) to executives at San Diego's redevelopment nonprofit.

Over the span of two weeks CalAware's president Donna Frye and lead attorney Terry Francke had battled Civic San Diego staff for calling non-scheduled regular meetings and immediately adjourning to closed session in order to discuss compensation with the then-unnamed incoming president — mayor Kevin Faulconer later announced that candidate was Reese Anthony Jarrett. (While the mayor is the person who selects a candidate, it is Civic San Diego's job to negotiate a salary.)

According to Civic San Diego chair Cynthia Morgan, Faulconer had asked the board to meet before the regularly scheduled July 30 open-session meeting so Jarrett didn't have to wait until after city council's August legislative recess.

CalAware took issue with Civic San Diego's last-minute scheduling. Days before a newly scheduled board meeting, CalAware threatened to file a lawsuit against Civic San Diego for violating state law, which prohibits any legislative body from calling a "special meeting regarding the salaries, salary schedules, or compensation paid in the form of fringe benefits, of a local agency executive."

Despite CalAware's previous warnings, Civic San Diego board members met on July 16 to discuss the issue as well as to nominate board chair Cynthia Morgan to negotiate with Jarrett.

At that meeting, boardmember Murtaza Baxamusa worried that the controversy could further damage Civic San Diego/Centre City Development Corporation’s already tarnished reputation.

"Why are we spending our resources in trying to hide from the public what the process is? If we were transparent then we would be talking about in open session who this candidate is and what their qualifications are and getting input from communities…. Instead we are going into closed session so the public will not find out what we are talking about; that is not the process I want to engage in. I do not want to talk about this in closed session."

Concerns aside, the board ended up voting to schedule another open/closed-session meeting on July 24 to conduct the negotiations.

The move prompted the July 31 letter from CalAware.

In it, CalAware demanded that Civic San Diego staff agree to never again "repeat the ad hoc designation of meetings." They also requested that the agency follow the law and stick to the previously approved meeting dates unless there is a need for an emergency closed-session meeting, one where labor negotiations do not take place.

Frye, of CalAware, is still confused by the process.

"The only rush of which I am aware was the mayor’s schedule to have the new president’s salary approved by Civic San Diego before the city council went on their legislative recess."

The odd thing is, says Frye, "Civic San Diego had a regular meeting scheduled for July 30 and the council has a special meeting scheduled for August 7, so this could have been handled pretty quickly. And because the city council does not vote on the president’s compensation, the approval of the mayor’s nominee could have been docketed for the August 7 special meeting. It is not clear why waiting a week or so to do it correctly would have made such a big difference."

When asked the reason for the rush, a spokesperson from mayor Faulconer's office said that the position was ready to be filled.

  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

More from SDReader


BlueSouthPark Aug. 4, 2014 @ 7:05 p.m.

What a fab selection! Jarrett has been a defendant in several breach-of-contract suits filed in the past few years, including one by the City of San Diego.

And a history with a whole load of companies and business interests, and the obligatory tie to Florida (West Palm Beach), a must for downtown players: He's the perfect guy for Civic SD.



laplayaheritage Aug. 4, 2014 @ 8:28 p.m.

Civic San Diego's staff latest is to erase over $105 Million in CDBG Income from the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Successor Agency (SA) for low income neighborhood by reclassifying Federal HUD Debt as Inter-Agency LAIF Loans such as RDA loans from the City's Sales Tax, Water, and Sewer.

Stealing from the poor is pathetic. Please investigate the violations of the Federal Civil Rights, Fair Housing, and HEATH Act.


nostalgic Aug. 4, 2014 @ 8:53 p.m.

All of these non-profits funded by taxpayers do it. Every CDC says, "Welcome, we are now going into closed session," That is, if somebody from the public could actually find out when a meeting is going on in the first place.


eastlaker Aug. 4, 2014 @ 10:03 p.m.

If we were wouldn't be San Diego!


dwbat Aug. 5, 2014 @ 8:51 a.m.

You GO, Donna! We miss you--and your take-no-crap attitude--on the Council!


Sign in to comment

Win a $25 Gift Card to
The Broken Yolk Cafe

Join our newsletter list

Each newsletter subscription means another chance to win!