• Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

"I remember my first encounter with a student here. I was wearing a suit, and a student comes up to me at lunch with a crowbar in his hand. Tapping it against his leg, he said, ‘Why are you wearing a suit? It is just going to get ripped when you break up a fight.’ That was my very first contact with a Gompers student.”

Speaking is Vincent Riveroll, director of Gompers Preparatory Academy in the Chollas View area of Southeast San Diego. The incident he’s recalling happened in spring 2004. Riveroll was not on staff at what was then two schools, Gompers Secondary and Gompers Middle School, on one campus at the corner of 47th and Hilltop. He was the principal of nearby Keillor. “I was asked by the superintendent,” Riveroll recalls, “to bring my vice principal and anyone else that Keiller could afford to go without and to come do lunch duty at Gompers to support the administration because chaos and riots were plaguing this school. So we stayed for that week to help with lunch supervision, and then I got the call to actually come back and open the next school year at Gompers — which had become two schools in one campus, Gompers Middle School and Gompers High School — as principal of the middle school.”It was not a plum post for the then–35-year-old Riveroll. “There were four principals in the two years that preceded me,” he says.

Violence reigned supreme at Gompers. The school sits in a neighborhood that is home to more than 50 known gangs, and gang culture wasn’t suspended at school. If anything, it was exacerbated by kids from rival gangs being thrown together on one campus.

In its architecture, Gompers is a typical 1950s California school — low-slung classroom buildings laid out in parallel lines east to west, covered outdoor hallways about 15 feet wide, and strips of grass growing between the structures. Cecil Steppe, chairman of Gompers’ board of governors, walks these hallways on a bright summer morning a few weeks before school starts. A cooling ocean breeze blows from the west down the long, broad, open corridors. It’s a tranquil setting, though one that saw very little tranquility until five years ago. Steppe stops at the intersection of one of the hallways and the corridor that bisects it. “Because of the gang violence this school used to have, these corridors were all lined with chain-link fencing, and there were gates so that when fights broke out these gates could be closed to isolate the behavior. The teachers and students would then lock themselves in classrooms. And we would have SWAT teams on campus.”

Riveroll remembers his first days as principal. “The police officers were present on a daily basis at the school. They would park their cars in our parking lot in anticipation of a call.”

Despite the heavy police presence, early in his tenure, “There was a riot. The police were actually jumped by the students. It was a very frantic time in Gompers’ history, and it was not safe or suitable for anyone, let alone kids.”

After school, neighborhood gangs would lie in wait for kids leaving school. “On any given school day,” Riveroll recalls, “on our side of the street there would be uniformed police officers on school property and — clothed with red or blue gang colors — gang members on the other side of the street waiting to pick their prey. And that was the norm.”

Police warned Riveroll and his staff not to cross the street into gangland. “My problem with that was that our kids crossed that street. What about our kids?”

So, like Julius Caesar who crossed the Rubicon in 49 B.C. and started civil war in Rome, Vincent Riveroll, “with a group of committed teachers and staff members,” crossed 47th Street and started the war to reclaim Gompers.

The Gates of Wisdom

That was Gompers five years ago, a place to which no well-meaning parent would send his or her child unless there were no alternative. And for many, there wasn’t. The school sits in one of the lowest-income neighborhoods in San Diego. “We have a 70 percent poverty rate,” says Gompers’ teacher and director of development Kathryn Strom, “so 70 percent of our children are from families at or below the poverty rate, which is about $21,000.”

The socioeconomic situation of the area has not improved since 2004. And yet here we are at Gompers in fall 2009, and how different things look. It’s 7:55 on the Thursday morning of the first week of school. Eight hundred students dressed in tan pants, black shoes, white dress shirts buttoned to the top, and navy blue ties gather in the eucalyptus- and jacaranda-shaded quad on the corner of 47th and Hilltop. They’re on school property but outside the chain-link perimeter of the school grounds. They chatter and laugh, but there is no fighting, no posturing, no running or shoving. Twenty or so faculty and staff members, all dressed well enough to work at a law firm, stand among the students. Collectively, they lend a definite air of adult supervision to the scene. “We have faculty and support staff out here to help check uniforms,” Strom says. “One of the biggest factors in changing the culture of the school has been having adults on hand and around the kids at all times.”

Off campus, at the major intersections on 47th and Euclid down to Market, community members in yellow vests assist kids — most Gompers students walk to school — across the busy streets. Paid by the Jacobs Family Foundation, these community members extend the sense of adult supervision beyond the campus limits.

At 8:00 a.m., Vincent Riveroll — now known as director, not principal — leaps onto a concrete bench. Tanned, well groomed, and decked in a black double-vented suit, the energetic 40-year-old holds a hand up in the air. Within ten seconds, the kids have formed two lines — one of boys, one of girls — and all noise has ceased.

“Good morning, children.”

“Good morning, Director Riveroll.”

“Please tell me what REACH stands for.”

In unison, the children yell, “Respect. Enthusiasm. Achievement. Citizenship. Hard work.”

“Good job,” Riveroll says while tossing (unsharpened) pencils to the kids as prizes.

Riveroll descends from his perch and makes his way to a gate in the chain-link perimeter. There he’s joined by Dolores Garcia, the school’s family services coordinator. He stands by the westward fence post, she by the east. Then, while inspirational music blares from the school’s public address system (“Ain’t No Stopping Us Now” by the Spice Girls, “It’s Off to Work We Go” by the Seven Dwarves, and “ABC” by the Jackson 5), the students enter the campus in lines. Riveroll greets each girl as she enters with a handshake and a “good morning.” The girls break their silence only to return the greeting while looking Riveroll in the eye. The boys do the same with Garcia. Standing a few feet into the campus, Strom narrates the action. “We call this the Gates of Wisdom. Every morning, the kids line up to come onto campus. When they come through the gate, they are greeted by the director or by one of the other staff. We teach them to shake hands, say good morning, and look the person in the eye when they shake hands. It shows respect, and it’s a great life lesson. Then we check their uniforms.”

As if on cue, Strom calls to one of the male students, “I need you to button up that top button, and make sure that you tuck that shirt in.”

Once on campus, the students hustle straight to class as faculty and staff members standing in the hallways exhort them to do just that. In five minutes, with little noise and lots of hustle and encouragement, all 800 kids are safely in their classrooms — no loitering, no yelling, no running and, most importantly, no fighting.

The Culture War

Before September 2004 was out, Riveroll had decided to invite the community in for “work group” discussions on how to improve Gompers. Michelle Evans, now Gompers’ assistant to the dean and a board member, attended those meetings. “She was the angriest parent there,” Riveroll says with a smile.

You wouldn’t believe it, looking at Evans. Her face emanates motherly kindness. But she doesn’t deny the charge. And when she gets talking about those days, a tidal wave of strength and attitude flows from her. Her silver and stone bracelets clink and clank as she tells a story about her son, an honors student at prior schools, being tracked into subpar classes and growing more and more disgruntled at Gompers in September 2004. After, by her own admission, chewing out teachers and administrators on campus, she came to one of the first community meetings. “I went home, rested, got dressed, got up, and I was the first one at the door at six o’clock,” Evans recalls. “Only ten other parents show up, and all these district staff show up. I am thinking, ‘What kind of parents…? No one is here.’ Then the district staff tells us in all this big fancy language that basically our school is failing because it hasn’t passed AYC or NCLP or something like that. I don’t know what those things mean. So I stand up and say, ‘First of all, talk to me in a language that I can understand. What is AYC? What is API? What is NCLP? All you white people can tell me is that you are going to close my neighborhood school down. So what am I supposed to do with my children? I don’t have a car. I don’t think so. You guys are going to fix it.’ ”

“The first parent meeting,” Riveroll recalls, “there was a lot of anger. This group had seen principals come and go and nothing ever change, so why should anyone listen to me?”

The meetings grew larger, up to 35 parents at each, and Riveroll heard a lot more anger. Parents, he says, were “infuriated that we had to bus the kids out of the community to get a good education. We had to get them up at 6:00 a.m. because their own neighborhood school wasn’t meeting their needs. A social injustice was happening, and that is a great catalyst for change.”

But for decades people had been saying change was needed at Gompers — and at nearly every inner-city school in America, for that matter. Underfunding, inner-city poverty, a lack of two-parent families, state budget cuts, bloated bureaucracies, and other seemingly insurmountable societal ills were offered as root causes. Riveroll had a simpler answer to what was wrong: culture. The violent culture of the surrounding streets spilled onto the campus, despite the police presence. Besides posing a physical danger to students, the nearly daily fights made Gompers an undesirable post for teachers. “We had a 75 percent attrition rate,” Strom says, “meaning three-quarters of our teachers were leaving every year. It was a scary environment for teachers as well as students. They didn’t want to be here.”

“There were 18 vacancies on day one of the [2004–2005] school year,” Riveroll adds. “So we started the school year with [teaching] vacancies, and we had substitutes that lasted throughout the whole year. There was a whole system that was denying equality in education for the students of this community, and that needed to change.”

Asked to explain his program of culture change, Riveroll instead offers to show what he means. He walks down one of Gompers’ broad hallways toward the intersection with a crossing corridor, arriving just as “transition” — the time between classes — starts. Kids exit their classrooms silently in lines accompanied by their teachers. There’s very little talking. “Before, kids would come out, congregate, and fight. No one was on supervision,” Riveroll says. “The transitions were a madhouse: kids running, breaking windows, dipping in and out of classrooms, fighting, very loud. There were huge tardy rates for classes. Even if their class was five seconds away, they would be ten minutes late. Now look, this is the transition. Supervision is all around — everybody is on supervision. These are our students. They are our kids.”

The kids, still in their lines, stop when Riveroll holds up his hand and calls out, “Does anybody know what REACH stands for?”

R is for respect. E is for enthusiasm. A is for achievement. C is for citizenship. H is for hard work,” the kids respond in unison.

Turning to a class of sixth graders, standing in lines nearby, he says, “Does this class, only four days old, know the mission statement?”

“The mission of Gompers Preparatory Academy, in partnership with University of California, San Diego and our community, is to accelerate academic achievement for all students through a college preparatory culture and curriculum.”

Riveroll turns to a different group of students. “I see some Latin students there. Please step forward and give us the mission statement in Latin.”

The kids dutifully step forward and recite, “Status Missionis: Finis ‘Gompers Preparatory Academy’ una cum Universitate Studiorum Californiae Didacopolitana ac civitate nostra, est acceleratio cursus discendi omnibus discipulis qui apti fiant ad Lycaeum per doctrinam culturamque.”

Looking pleased as punch, Riveroll turns to a guest. “Culture,” he says. “And, by the way, this is free public education.”

The Charter War

The replacement of the culture of violence with a culture of respect and achievement has produced good fruit. Fights are a rarity, not a daily occurrence. Instead of losing teachers at a 75 percent annual rate, Gompers now keeps 80 percent. And the school’s Academic Performance Index, the California Department of Education’s bottom-line indicator of school performance, rose from a 541 (out of a possible 1000) in Riveroll’s first year to 622 in the 2007–2008 school year. It’s the biggest percentage increase of any school serving a similar demographic in San Diego Unified.

In order to achieve these successes, Gompers Middle School became Gompers Charter Middle School during the second half of the 2004–2005 school year. (This year, the school added ninth and tenth grades and is known as Gompers Preparatory Academy.) The transition to charter school was not easy, because San Diego Unified School District and the teachers’ union were against the change.

How does simply going charter change the culture of a school?

“It doesn’t immediately,” answers Cecil Steppe, Gompers’ chairman of the board, “but it gives you the freedom to do it. Under the district, they make a lot of the financial decisions. They make all the hiring decisions, curricular decisions, structural decisions.”

A charter school makes those decisions on its own. For that reason, during the work-group meetings at the beginning of the 2004–2005 school year, Riveroll, Gompers faculty, and parents decided to make a push to go charter. “There were three major issues that the community and parents decided were the main problems of the school,” Riveroll recalls, “the safety issue, the ability to recruit and retain teachers, and increasing parental involvement.”

Even as principal, Riveroll had very little control over recruitment and retention of teachers. “A classic example of how this school was neglected, in terms of not having a staff that was capable and willing,” Riveroll says, “was during my first year of interviewing for the vacancies. I did not hire one [particular] person because I felt as the principal that he would not be an effective fit for the needs of the school. But that person, despite my having sat across the room from him and saying, ‘This isn’t the place for you,’ ended up, unbeknownst to me, at the first-day-of-school staff meeting, saying, ‘I was assigned here anyway.’ And the story plays out that within the first quarter there was an opening at a more desirable, affluent school, and that employee ended up abandoning our kids and leaving me with yet another vacancy. And that was just one of the many reasons why there were vacancies. It was a revolving door of vacancies. How can kids learn if they don’t have any consistency?”

One attempt to solve the teacher turnover and vacancy problem involved dialogue with the teachers’ union, the San Diego Education Association, “to ask for waivers on the hiring process with Gompers so that we could hire teachers that wanted to be here and maybe do some incentive pay to come to this particular school. And the parents and the community were denied by the teachers’ union at that time.”

Several reasons were cited by the union representative. “It was against the union contract,” Riveroll says, “and the bargaining agreement. They were adamant that they couldn’t do something for one school and not do it for all schools. It broke parents’ hearts. I sat in that room and heard the parents pleading with a union rep from SDEA, ‘Please help us.’ And the union representative said, ‘I know this may sound hard, but my responsibility is to the teachers, not to the students.’ And parents just started to weep.

“One of the major roadblocks at this particular school was vacancies that weren’t being filled. So we went to the superintendent, we went to the district, and we went to the union to really find a way within the system to make these changes. And to have it be denied at every level broke the parents’ hearts. They saw the bureaucracy firsthand.”

That was when the charter idea moved to the fore. Riveroll had resisted the idea because of the immensity of the task. But when all official channels failed, he felt Gompers, if it were to improve, had no choice but to go charter. “So this amazing, committed staff would work late at night after full ten-hour days. We would grab some dinner, and all the parents would come in at night, and starting at 7:00 p.m., we would all work late into the evening looking for solutions and writing our charter that put students first and states that all students can go to college. Word got out, and UCSD became involved. Many of the things that we wanted for our school were already being implemented at the Preuss School, which is also a charter school. So they sent representatives to see if this charter could be matched with the university. And that partnership seemed very seamless to happen. It seemed like a natural fit. So they stayed at the table and really became actively involved with the work group at night.”

Signatures of parents supporting the charter idea had to be gathered, as did signatures of teachers. It was an arduous process made more difficult by the resistance from officialdom. “There were so many people who were opposed to this even happening,” Riveroll says, “that the fact that there is a charter school here today is astonishing.”

“The resistance was never at a community level,” Steppe says. “We were weary of our kids catching a bus to go somewhere else to get an education. It was at the district level and union level.”

“As soon as the work groups started moving toward charter,” Riveroll says, “that is when the district’s and the union’s full opposition emerged. Every kind of roadblock that you can think of happened. From scare tactics, to threats to teachers for siding with the charter, to closed late-night meetings to scare teachers not to go back to those work-group meetings and not to voice approval of it, to the actual removal of me as principal, with two days’ notice. It was ‘Pack up and leave. You are being promoted to mentor principal to all the principals in the district.’ In the middle of the year, they say you have two days to pack up — you are going to the district office and leaving the school after months of building trust with the community and the parents and the students and a core group of teachers.”

Asked what was the source of district opposition to Gompers’ charter aspirations, Riveroll responds with a question: “What’s the root of all evil?”

Gompers receives about $5.5 million per year in average daily attendance money from the State of California. “The district didn’t want to lose control of the school and the revenue it brings in. But you also had people that believe that after 30 years of failing schools that all of a sudden, within the system that failed it, we could still fix it. They thought it didn’t need to go charter. Parents and community members who lived through it were saying, ‘We have heard this before.’ ”

The issue came to a head at a contentious March 1, 2005 Board of Education meeting at San Diego Unified’s headquarters in University Heights, when Gompers student Maryam Saadati “walks up to the mike, and in an auditorium packed with 300 people bickering and making a lot of loud noise, Maryam clears her throat and timidly says, ‘Don’t we deserve good things?’ And the entire auditorium was silent. A child’s voice shut everybody up. And shortly after, the board voted 5–0 to approve the charter” and reinstate Riveroll as principal.

“We’re College Prep Here”

As she walks the halls of Gompers Prep during a transition between morning periods, Strom greets and smiles at students as they pass. She also checks to make sure uniforms are up to code. “Button all the way up, gentlemen,” she tells a couple of grinning tenth graders whose top buttons are undone and ties loosened. “We’re college prep here.”

The boys obey, and in their tan slacks, white dress shirts, and navy blue ties — buttoned to the top — they look college prep. Sure, instead of the ivy-covered walls, stone edifices, and serene exurban settings of an East Coast prep school, it’s 1950s California architecture, noise from State Route 94, which borders the campus to the north, and an inner-city location. But they look like college prep students, and they’re constantly told by Strom, Riveroll, and the whole Gompers faculty that they’re preparing for college.

The repeated reinforcement of the idea of college is a deliberate effort to get Gompers students into the mind-set that college is in their future. College after high school may seem an obvious path to many, but it’s a major cultural shift in this neighborhood where completing high school is less than a sure thing.

Riveroll understands there’s more to preparing kids for college than putting them in uniforms and telling them they’re college prep. Along with solving the teacher-vacancy problem and the safety issue, going charter allowed Gompers to institute curricular changes. One new idea Riveroll brought in was to return to an old idea, the study of Latin. Understanding that Latin can be a tough sell to parents, he supplies them with information on why it’s important. “Studying Latin,” the information packet states, “improves vocabulary… 67% of all English words have their origin in the Latin language. Indeed, the English language even contains a large number of actual Latin words which have not changed (in meaning or spelling) since the time of the Romans…just to name a few: superior, census, interim, dictum, inferior.… Up to 80% of all words in French, Spanish, Italian, Rumanian, and Portuguese…come from Latin. This makes the learning of these languages considerably easier as the Latin language supplies so many roots of the language being studied. As far as English is concerned, about 50% of the words are derived from Latin.

“And what about jobs: Teaching; there is a shortage of Latin teachers. Law; much of our legal system has its roots in ancient Rome, and as a result so many of our legal terms are simply expressed in Latin. Medicine; did you know that the language of medicine for over a thousand years was Latin? Many of the terms used in medicine still come from this language. Archaeology; for those who work in archaeology and specialize in Greece or Rome, a reading knowledge of Latin is a must. Linguistics; this is a study of how languages work. Its importance is clear for this field as well. Arts; in literature, music, painting, sculpture and drama there are countless references to the worlds of ancient Greece and Rome.”

Beyond Latin, Gompers has installed the “A–G Curriculum,” which, Riveroll explains, “is the specific course work that students need to complete in order to be eligible for UC and Cal State schools. Proficiency in A–G requirements demonstrates that students have the rigorous courses and skill set to be successful in college.”

The requirements are:

a. Two years of history/social science, including one year of world history, cultures, and historical geography and one year of U.S. history or one-half year of U.S. history and one-half year of civics or American government.

b. Four years of college preparatory English that include frequent and regular writing and reading of classic and modern literature.

c. Three years of college preparatory mathematics that include the topics covered in elementary and advanced algebra and two- and three-dimensional geometry.

d. Two years of laboratory science providing fundamental knowledge in at least two of these three disciplines: biology, chemistry, and physics.

e. Two years of the same language other than English.

f. One year of visual or performing arts, including dance, drama/theater, music, or visual art.

g. One year (two semesters) of college preparatory elective(s), chosen from additional “A–F” courses beyond those used to satisfy the requirements above or courses that have been approved solely for use as “G” electives.

Riveroll lists other curricular changes that have been made to establish a college preparatory culture at Gompers. “All eighth graders take Algebra 1. Before the charter, only 50 students took Algebra 1 in eighth grade. All students will take at least one AP class before graduation. Ninth graders take geometry. Students are required to perform presentations of learning for each unit. High school students are enrolled in university prep classes to help with college entrance. Students in need of extra academic support are enrolled in college study group for math or English support, which is an additional 90 minutes of math or English support every other day, beyond their regular math or English class, in a 15:1 [student-to-teacher ratio] setting. All students attend a weekly college class.”

The weekly college class, which Riveroll teaches, is held in Gompers’ auditorium. “College class,” Gompers’ website states, “serves as an opportunity to connect and communicate with the student body in a formal setting that simulates a large college lecture hall. With a high regard to respect and discipline, students are educated on schoolwide events, areas of growth, areas of achievement, and character education as it relates to school culture. College class also serves as a platform for students to learn public-speaking skills that will serve in other formal settings. College class is the foundation of school culture that supports the overall instructional program at [Gompers Preparatory Academy].”

Another key piece of the budding college prep culture at Gompers is the involvement of the University of California at San Diego. “UCSD is involved on many levels,” Riveroll says. “We are modeled after the Preuss School at UCSD. Three of our boardmembers are UCSD professors. College tutors come in to work directly with our students, and UCSD interns come to us as part of their credential program. And UCSD CREATE [Center for Research on Educational Equity, Assessment, and Teaching Excellence] provides professional development and data-evaluation services. Each year we sign a memorandum of understanding with the university that spells out these services and gives us permission to use the UCSD logo. However, we do not receive any funding from the university. [And] our students do not have access to any kind of special admissions track to UCSD, although we make it a priority for every student to know the A–G requirements for acceptance to the UC system. Through our partnership with UCSD, our students have access to the campus through many field-trip opportunities each year, from general campus tours to attending lectures and content-area-specific field trips.”

The Preuss School is a middle and high school founded at the university in 1999 and specifically designed to provide a college-preparatory environment and curriculum to inner-city students who, if they go on to graduate from college, would be the first in their families to do so. “The second mission [of Preuss],” Riveroll explains, “was to serve as a model school to study and develop best practices in the college preparation of low-income, urban students to be disseminated to improve public education. When Gompers decided to become an independent charter school, UCSD professors involved in the Preuss project saw an opportunity to fulfill this second mission by implementing the best practices from Preuss into one of the urban neighborhoods in which many of their students live. Many of the structures of Preuss have been duplicated with success over the past four years at Gompers Prep.”

Gompers vs. San Diego Unified

Test scores are up. Violence is down. Teachers are being retained. Inner-city students are taking college preparatory courses. You’d think San Diego Unified would be thrilled by the turnaround at what was once one of its worst schools. But the relationship between Gompers and the district has, since the beginning of the charter days, been strained. “But I also think that you see the friction between charters and districts all over the United States,” says Strom.

“Because the money follows the students,” Steppe adds.

The school district has the power to place special-education students at any of its schools, including charter schools. And Gompers, Steppe says, receives a disproportionately high number. “Last year,” Steppe says, “18 percent of our students were special-ed students. That was higher than anyplace else in this district. So what we did was, because we believe that every child has the capacity to learn, we mainstreamed a lot of our special-ed students.”

The problem is, Gompers had to pay the district to oversee the school’s special education, and it had to use the special-education teachers the district sent. This year, Northern California’s El Dorado County Office of Education will oversee special education at Gompers. The $520,000 Gompers pays El Dorado County is $89,000 less than it had been paying San Diego Unified. Beyond the savings, the switch to El Dorado allows Gompers to hire its own special-education teachers who, Strom says, “we know will buy into the way we do things here, because we hired them ourselves.”

There have been other disputes with the district. This past summer, the district announced plans to appropriate enough of Gompers’ grassless athletic field to erect 11 classroom bungalows for neighboring Millennial Tech Middle School. On top of that, the district declared its intention to build a bus turnaround on the north part of Gompers’ campus, hard by State Route 94. Gompers objected, maintaining that the nature of its charter gives it discretion over how all the land within its fences is used. In late July, Gompers was prepared to initiate legal action on this point, when the two parties agreed to meet and work out some kind of compromise, which is still being hammered out. Says Riveroll, “The district is holding monthly work-group meetings with both Millennial Tech parents and Gompers parents to create a long-range master plan for the site. The district is creating drawings that reflect the parents’ wishes for the district to build a high school sports complex for Gompers Prep, a gym for Gompers Prep, and a new academic building for Gompers Prep. It will be up to the Board of Education to approve the plans and the funding for such projects.”

Asked if the compromise will end antagonism from the district, Steppe smiles and shakes his head. “There will always be something. But I’ve told them, ‘We’re not going anywhere. So if you want to come after us, you’d better bring your A-game, because we are going to fight you every step of the way.’ ”

Welcome, Honored Guests

Strom leads a guest into a tenth-grade English class where Ms. Hobbs is teaching a class on Shakespeare. When the visitors enter, the class stands up, and one young man says, “Repeat after me: ‘Welcome, honored guests.’ ”

“Welcome, honored guests.”

The class sits and resumes its discussion of climax and denouement in Shakespeare. Strom motions to one girl to come outside for a chat. Her name is Shanique Davis. She’s dressed in tan pants, a dress blouse, and a navy blue tie. Blue and green beads accent her braided hair. A pretty smile flashes across her face when she’s asked about the mandatory uniform. “I like wearing it,” she says. “First of all, it saves time. This morning I was running behind, and I would have been late for school if I’d had to pick out what I was going to wear. With the uniform, I don’t even have to think about it. I just throw it on and head out the door.”

But convenience isn’t the only reason Davis likes the uniform. “I’ve been to schools without uniforms, and people spend a lot of time looking at what other people are wearing and talking about it. ‘Did you see what she was wearing? Oh my gosh, look at those shoes. How embarrassing.’ At Gompers, we don’t have to worry about that. We can focus on learning.”

  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

Comments

ladana Dec. 9, 2009 @ 6:55 p.m.

While it is true Gompers has had issues for years, it was not always the case. Back in the 1980's, academically, it was one of the most competitive, desirable high schools to attend in San Diego. At that time, it served grades 7-12, with the high school classes being small. Most graduates at the time went on to college, and many to Ivy League schools. One could merely check National Merit Scholarship awards, Academic Decathlon, Science Olympiad, and Science Fair award records to verify this. What changed? SDUSD dumped a principal there who had no regard or appreciation for the reputation Gompers' faculty and students built. In a year or two, she managed to undo all of it, which resulted in the strongest teachers fleeing the school for the likes of La Jolla High, etc. The school soon failed. Congratulations to the current faculty, staff and students for the leadership and dedication you all have shown to bringing dignity and substance back to a Gompers education. Well done!

0

wiro Dec. 9, 2009 @ 7:35 p.m.

Gompers has proved to be a great success story. Being part of the GPA family myself, I have experienced the hard work ALL staff puts into day activities. The kids are our number one priority and we all work together to help our students who need someone to believe in them. GO GOMPERS PREP ACADEMY!!!!

0

werdup Dec. 10, 2009 @ 9:53 a.m.

Also a new staff member, and, I must admit, I was a skeptic...but, I have stayed focused and committed and this school has changed my life. These AMAZING kids have changed my life. Director Riveroll is a visionary, and he is taking us and our kids on a path that can only lead to success. If you are an educator who is not in it for the kids, then GPA is not for you. But, if you show up everyday wanting to do right by them, even when it's hard, (and let me tell you, it is the hardest job I have EVER done,) then you are in the right place.

You should come witness the magic for yourselves!

0

ChuckAdkins Dec. 10, 2009 @ 7:29 p.m.

While much of the article is valid, it seems more like a fluff piece than objective reporting. The article mentions teacher retention. Ah, a simple peruse of edjoin.org on a given day will find three to four open positions. Why are so many teachers bailing on the academy if things are so rosy?

I am not saying the good things are not happening at GPA but I would enjoy some objective reporting instead of more PR fluff from Director Riveroll, the master of spin.

0

teela Dec. 10, 2009 @ 8:58 p.m.

As Ladana mentioned. Gompers was a very good school for many years. I graduated in 1996, in a class that had over 90% of students going to college in the fall. Leaving out the former legacy of Gompers seems like a major hole in this article.

0

crewinbruin Dec. 11, 2009 @ 10:23 a.m.

As a former Gompers student and graduate I was there throughout the 90's being bussed in as part of the magnet program. The former principal there did drive the school into the ground and ruined it's once great history. I'm very happy to see that the school has been reclaimed by the neighborhood, caring teachers and the parents of the students.

During my time there I'd say the #1 problem with the school was the complete lack of parental involvement. Kids come from families where school is an afterthought to parents and there is no push to excel from home. The parents simply expect teachers to put in 100% of the work needed to raise their children. It's great to see that someone has finally broken through this cultural problem.

As for ChuckAdkins, as a former student this is not a fluff piece, but refreshing knowledge that my school is rebuilding its legacy of academic prowess. Chuck, go spend a week observing and assisting in low income schools across the county and then try and call this fluff.

0

charterwatch Dec. 12, 2009 @ 6:46 p.m.

Fluff piece would be the least criticism that could be made about the article. Ignoring the misspelling of Keiller, the article is riddled with inaccuracies and overly one-sided. Beginning with the name of the school being Gompers Prep. While that is the name of the newly opened high school with 9th graders only, there is a 6th through 8th grade Gompers Charter Middle School (GCMS) still in operation. There was a recent U-T article that brought to light the somewhat nebulous reason to merge the schools. Mostly, the ability to bury the middle school and forget that it's in Year 3 of Program Improvement and not have the high school loose a $450,000 federal grant received by every new charter school that is opened. This money grab by charter operators is only just being exposed to the light of day. Mainstreaming Special Education students does not change the fact that they may still be identified as such and must receive services per an IEP. GCMS could still have 18% of its students identified as Special Education. Gompers did not "hire" the El Dorado County SELPA but had to apply to join. While Gompers may have a large Special Education population, charter schools as a group have a much lower percentage of such students due to their ability to put up barriers to enrollment. Interesting that GCMS would like to emulate the Preuss Model school as it has one of the lowest Special Education populations and yet insists it does not cherry pick students. Most charter schools will continue to abandon Special Education students as educating them can be quite costly and they don't really fit into their vision. Also of interest, is that the school's Director and several other top level administrative staff of the school, remain employees of the San Diego Unified School District. Wouldn't it be nice that these "District" employees were subject to the same "at will" employment contracts as GCMS employees. The continued privatization and profitization of public education under the guise of "public" charter schools continues. It would be amusing if it wasn't so scary but the question about the root of all evil is all to apt and should make the taxpayers greatly concerned. A game indeed!

0

Hmmmmm Dec. 12, 2009 @ 7:45 p.m.

After reading this article I am left wondering. Why is a school that demonstrates best practices continually showing minimal to no improvement in student achievement? How is it that the administration of Gompers will go to such great lengths to hide its cracks? Gompers was built on the foundation and hard work of strong teachers and leaders with a mission that every school should adopt. Yet, as the years have passed this charter has become a fake. There are no teachers in this school that don’t live and breathe the wish to close the achievement gap, but there is a force larger than life that holds back their accomplishments. Vince Riveroll is the man behind the curtain, the man who we want to believe, but who holds no real truths. Behind the facades, GCMS, GPA, or whatever you call it, you will find cracking walls, tired and hurting teachers, students who are forgotten, and a “Director” who interrupts learning (like the progress of GCMS) at every turn. In the years before the charter they would “[start] the school year with [teaching] vacancies, and [they] had substitutes that lasted throughout the whole year”. While Riveroll might be quoted as keeping 80% of his teachers every year, I wonder how this math is calculated given the hoards of teachers that leave mid-year, and the line of teachers that left last year. While the elimination of union rights allows Riveroll to find the “better fit” teachers for his school, I find he makes up his own rules. Without these “silly” unions, Riveroll spreads guilt like this rain, over every teacher that does not spend 12 hour days and thousands of money on their classes. There is a sense that teachers are never safe at GCMS and that their very livelihood may rely on their few interactions with the Director. Futhermore, the ability to recite the A-G requirements does not ever mean that they are in fact in place or successful. Riveroll has changed the face of learning at GCMS to focus on presentation rather than content. While I promote learning through a variety of modalities, I find that his POL’s are not meant to function as demonstrations of learning; rather, they are opportunities to show off to his guests, just like the author of this article. GCMS has become a kind of Disney attraction, where every guest gets the same tour, visits the “good” classes, and the teachers plaster on their smiles so as to not be treated to a public chastising by the Director himself. While the teachers are treated with disrespect, I feel that it is the students who are suffering the most in the end. This 6 – 12th grade school serves a population of students who are tenacious, genuine, talented, and wonderful. It seems that living below the poverty line has given students in our nation a ticket to a low performing school, and unfortunately, GCMS is not a solution. I believe that as long as this school is under the guidance of this principal, Gompers will continue its legacy as a low performing school.

0

Visduh Dec. 14, 2009 @ 2:05 p.m.

It took a while for me to find the time to read the entire article and to read the comments. I'm glad that there were a few comments that pointed out that the story told by the administration is not a complete one. Having been to many of the more advantaged middle and high schools in the county, and having seen them up close and personal, the picture of these well-behaved, respectful, and smartly attired students is very appealing. But since no public school I've ever seen can achieve such results, I find this story unbelievable. If those advantaged schools cannot achieve more than so-so results, how could a school like Gompers ever hope to? One might remember that no principal will present a face to the public of anything less than a cadre of "walk on water" teachers that is the best ever assembled in one school. And the students are always bright eyed, bushy tailed, eager to learn, and great citizens. The truth about schools is far more bitter in that they are highly imperfect places that do the best they can with what they have to work with.

Some insight into Gompers would have been provided if the author had dug back into its history. Gompers was one of those schools that was heavily affected by the VEEP program that the district ran in the 80's and 90's to reduce racial segregation. (Sorry, I don't remember what the initials stood for, save that V was for "voluntary.") It consisted of taking large numbers to white students by bus to "magnet" schools in the minority areas of town, and taking minority students out of their own neighborhoods to schools in generally white areas. But it was really a sham because many or most of the magnet programs served predominately white students, even though they were in the older and poorer areas. And likewise, some of the schools in the more affluent neighborhoods were shipping out almost all of their own kids while receiving those from the minority areas. But, on paper it looked good, and met the requirements of the settlement of the Carlin lawsuit.

Gompers, in addition to being the local junior high/middle school, got a math-science magnet high school. The teachers who worked on that campus were expected to teach some of both the neighborhood middle school classes and also do some of the magnet program. But one feature of the place was mind-boggling. There was a fence in the middle of the campus to keep the local kids separated from the magnet high schoolers! If anyone had some doubts about the functionality and/or sincerity of the VEEP program, the separation of kids at that school should have substantiated them. teela and crewinbruin are graduates of that magnet program, something that does not exist at Gompers today.

Too bad this article didn't really dig deep and tell the full story of what is really happening at Gompers.

0

David Dodd Dec. 14, 2009 @ 2:55 p.m.

VEEP = Voluntary Enrollment Exchange Program

And Visduh, when I went to public elementary school, kindergarteners were separated from grades 1-3, and grades 1-3 were separated from grades 4-6. I believe it had to do with socialization in peer groups, which seems logical to me.

So far as the story goes, if you look at it in a broader sense, it simply examines the benefits of a school making its own decisions (within State guidelines), rather than a bunch of District Officers making decisions that are often nebulous concerning individual schools within the district. In that sense, Charter Schools have an advantage.

Every teacher I know teaching in public schools relates the same issues - that the students mostly don't care to learn and the teacher is handcuffed. It is a babysitting job more than anything else. Teachers in public schools are not permitted to execute that which is necessary in order to promote and ensure student involvement at a level where almost all students will benefit. My hunch, supported by this story, is that Charter Schools often find ways to accomplish what Public schools can't.

For example, Latin was not offered at any of the public schools I attended through high school. Latin should be a requirement. All five romance languages and much of the English language is rooted in Latin.

0

Visduh Dec. 14, 2009 @ 5:09 p.m.

refriedgringo, in my previous post I was making some comments about charter schools, but space limits forced me to delete them. Gosh, I wish that I could buy into the notion that charter schools were the answer to all our educational ills. The sad part is that most of them don't accomplish much, although a few are doing good things. Worse yet, many have ended up in scandals that involved mismanagement or financial improprieties. The advisory boards that run many of the charter schools are made up of well meaning folks, but they often just don't know how to run a school. The result is often falling for a big talker who makes promises that could not be kept by JC himself. Career public school administrators are very good at that, and I suspect Riveroll is better than most. Then there are the charter schools that end up hiring a company to run the place, and the owners/managers of the company are paying themselves millions a year. Talk about siphoning dollars out of the classroom! Generally, the district that granted the charter is not equipped to act in an oversight manner, and has its hands full with just running its own schools.

Take a look at Helix Charter High. It was struggling for years, and finally when some involved people decided that a real change was needed, it was converted to charter status about a decade ago. Today it is still struggling, and has had a series of sex scandals wherein male teachers had illegal contact with female students. Chartering Helix doesn't seem to this casual observer to have done anything positive for the place.

What charters do is give too much power to the chief executive of the operation. The board cannot control him/her, nor can the chartering district, and he/she gets to ride roughshod over teachers, and students and parents. Some of them act like the tsars of old. Is Riveroll one of those?

0

David Dodd Dec. 14, 2009 @ 5:50 p.m.

Visduh, I reckon there's an entirely different set of issues of concern with charter schools, as you point out. I never attended any school other than public, so I couldn't say first hand. The chief executive having too much power can be a problem. But the positive angle is that it eliminates much of the politics played in the public school district.

Perhaps the chief executive should be accountable to a parental board, an unpaid board elected by other parents to do nothing but oversee the chief executive? If Riveroll turns out to be a dictator who fails, and my child was enrolled at Gompers, that would be something that I would suggest.

0

ladana Dec. 14, 2009 @ 6:48 p.m.

Vishduh, what "fence" are you referring to which separated the local kids from the magnet high-schoolers? Are you speaking literally? I graduated from the Gompers in the early 90's and have no recollection of such a fence.

0

Visduh Dec. 14, 2009 @ 8:34 p.m.

ladana--I was earning my credential in the 1993-4 period through UCSD, which had a strong interest in Gompers. The instructors spoke about the fence at that time, and I had no reason to doubt them because they weren't looking for things to knock at Gompers. They described how the local middle schoolers were physically separated from the bussed-in magnet school students. I remember comments to the effect that it prevented fights and intimidation. Sound familiar? But no, I actually had only second-hand knowledge of that fence. When they talked of a fence, they meant it literally.

0

ladana Dec. 15, 2009 @ 11:35 a.m.

Visduh: I can say there was no such physical fence in the 6 years I attended Gompers (grades 7-12). However, one might argue there was a symbolic fence because of the different tracks the magnet students were on, as compared to the local students. Some might recall, at the time, it was termed the "school within the school." However, even if you were on the magnet track, you still had classes with non-magnet students in language classes, physical education, student government, yearbook, student newspaper, art, shop, music, and chorus, not to mention the interaction at lunch time and during passing periods. If you were informed there was an actual fence, you were misled, at least for the time I attended. Further, students during the early 90's may recall the "REM" Center, which was developed on what was then called the east campus, which was a small school next door that Gompers acquired. REM, as I recall, stood for "Respect, Expect, Motivate" and students from magnet and non-magnet classes attended a week of workshops and activities at the center. There was no fence dividing the magnet and non-magnet students...I'm not saying it was all one big happy family, but there was a community there and not the rampant violence portrayed in the article that seemed to develop at a later time.

0

Braukuche Dec. 15, 2009 @ 2:06 p.m.

It is complete nonsense to blame teachers and their unions for the state of education in this country. The problem is the demands of the job have changed and no one wants to owe up to who is responsible and therefore there is no solution. 30 years ago, teachers were not expected to parent their students. Does anyone beside me find it odd that teachers have to teach such rudiments of civilized social behavior as pulling your pants up and not swearing at adults? But that is the reality. Teachers have to deal with social decay, which is bad enough, but then to be blamed for it, is beyond the pale. I guess true believers like Riveroll think all teachers should put in 12 hour days to parent parent less children, but then who will take care of the teacher's kids? It is absurd to think teachers should have to do more than teach.

0

David Dodd Dec. 15, 2009 @ 3:01 p.m.

Braukuche, if you are drawing the conclusion that moral decay is the cause of an often failing system of the proper education of youth in California, I couldn't disagree more. Note that moral decay is relevant; two hundred years ago I'm sure that moral decay was considered the reason for a lot of failed endeavors. They were mostly wrong back then, too.

Schools and school districts are funded based on attendence. They are not funded based on the scholastic achievement of the student body. Students no longer have to learn, they just have to show up and endure. My son, after nine years of school in Mexico, attended a San Diego high school for three years and, by his own admission, learned very little on his way to graduating with better than average grades.

0

CuddleFish Dec. 17, 2009 @ 11:19 a.m.

This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.

0

Visduh Dec. 26, 2009 @ 8:24 a.m.

This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.

0

CuddleFish Feb. 2, 2010 @ 11:03 p.m.

This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.

0

Sign in to comment

Let’s Be Friends

Subscribe for local event alerts, concerts tickets, promotions and more from the San Diego Reader

Close