• News Ticker alerts

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, whose La Jolla beach house construction project has been attacked by his political foes as grossly extravagant, has lagged on paying city fees for the mega-million dollar endeavor, city building records show.

According to an exchange of emails furnished by the city after a request under the California Public Records Act, Romney and his wife Ann were nearly five months late paying their bill to the City's Development Services Department for a variety of building inspection and permit services for the project, which first came to iight in a report here back in December 2010.

As reported then, city lobbying reports revealed that the Romneys had hired Island Architects to help push the project through the city.

But after the project began receiving national attention, progress apparently slowed.

The recently released documents show that In March 2012, the City sent Ann Romney a bill for $17,921 for management work performed between April 2010 through February 29, 2012. The April 27 due date came and went.

Then, one month later, another invoice for $18,520, was sent out.

On June 7, three weeks before the second invoice was due, Matt Peterson, a lawyer based in San Diego working on behalf of the Romneys, wrote to program manager Michelle Sokolowski about the outstanding balance.

"My clients were not aware of this bill," wrote Peterson. "Was this one of those city billing glitches?"

It wasn't a glitch said Sokolowski.

"I received a phone call after the first statement from a woman who identified herself as Ann Romney's secretary saying she was calling about the statement, so I know they received it. I returned the call and left a message but never got a call back.

"You should note that the last invoice that was paid on this project was well over one year ago (March 2011), and there have been charges since then. Although the project has been placed on hold, there are periodic charges to it, since we still receive calls from the public with various questions and other minor items. However, as you can see by the statement attached, there have not been substantive charges since you placed the project on hold.

"Thank you for ensuring prompt payment."

According to the City of San Diego, the balance was paid in full on July 30.

Plans previously filed for the project have included turning an existing 3,000-square-foot oceanfront house into a 8,105-square-foot estate, featuring an outdoor water feature and a car lift in the garage.

I am waiting to hear back from Mr. Peterson on the late payments

  • News Ticker alerts

Comments

jaybeecee Sept. 8, 2012 @ 1:27 p.m.

It's going to be so much more advantageous for the Romneys when (they think) Uncle $am pays the bill - after all, noblesse .... errr, I mean even imagining oneself being POTUS does have its privileges. I still feel cheated when, years ago, so many improvements were made to Mr. Nixon's California White House at taxpayers' expense that he promised to transfer the mansion's title to the people of the US (also POTUS, LOL) once his term expired. It's absolutely normal for people to change their minds --and he did -- and the title remained with the original POTUS.

... anyone else feel like deja vu ?

0

ricky Oct. 24, 2012 @ 12:22 p.m.

This sentence in your posting here is fabricated:

"It wasn't a glitch said Sokolowski."

In fact, this was her response: "As you know, statements were not sent from the City's Comptroller's office for awhile."

Not only did she not say "it wasn't a glitch," she in fact confirmed that it was a glitch.

As the U-T has reported, the reason the bills did not go out "for a while" (it was actually nine months) was complications with the computer system transition. You can read about that here: http://bit.ly/HkxGSP

0

NonnyMus Nov. 8, 2012 @ 1:29 a.m.

Hey ricky,

On this planet, it's best to have good evidence before you accuse anyone of fabrication!

Yes, in March 2012, some people received bills from the San Diego Development Services department in error. The Romney's bill was NOT one of those. How can we tell? Well, the bill was paid in full in July, which wouldn't have happened if the bill was a error from their computer glitch!

It's also important to cite your sources. For example, you supposedly quote Ms. Sokolowski, but don't cite a source for that quote. It's certainly not in this article nor in the one you cite.

On the other hand, this article clearly states its sources for its report that the Romney's received the bill in March 2012 and received follow-up bills, yet didn't pay the bill until July 2012, almost four months late.

It's important to have clear evidence and cite your sources of that evidence before you start making accusations, K?

Kthxbye!

0

Sign in to comment