Anchor ads are not supported on this page.

4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs

Sunrise Powerlink Comments to Cleveland National Forest Supervisor

The following was sent to the Forest Supervisor, so that he may allow SDG&E to put the Sunrise Powerlink project through the Cleveland National Forest... as long as it is entirely tunneled under the forest.


William Metz, Forest Supervisor
10845 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 200
San Diego, California 92127

ATTN: Sunrise Powerlink Comments

The Forest Supervisor may permit the intrusion of San Diego Gas & Electric Company's proposed Sunrise Powerlink project, but under the United States Code and the Code of Federal Regulations as to Forest Service, the Forest Supervisor may require the proposed project be conditioned by tunneling construction entirely underground to preserve the scenic integrity of the Cleveland National Forest, especially with respect to those areas that are currently undisturbed by any human presence but which may be subject to possible future utility disturbance above ground.

A Forest Supervisor decision to make a permit contingent on the utility's tunneling and other efforts to avoid disturbing Cleveland National Forest scenic integrity (36 CFR §261.1a as to “Forest Officer may place such conditions on the authorization as that officer considers necessary for the protection or administration of the National Forest System...”) is well supported by federal law and regulations as authorized by Congress and the President. Laws and regulations forbid the destruction by fire and depredation (16 USC §551), the disturbance of timber (36 CFR §261.6) or natural features and plants (36 CFR §261.9), the use of motorized vehicles that damages or disturbs that land or vegetation (36 CFR §261.15), and the entry with motorized equipment into primitive areas not previously disturbed by human presence (36 CFR §261.21). The Forest Supervisor shall aid other agencies in the performance of duties as imposed on those agencies by law (16 USC §553). The Forest Supervisor, for the Secretary of Agriculture, is obligated to determine and demonstrate the best methods for conserving forest lands in cooperation specifically with the State of California (16 USC §562).

The added cost of tunneling and otherwise avoiding any scenic integrity disturbance of the Cleveland National Forest shall be borne by SDG&E's corporate holding company Sempra Energy, pursuant to a previous Interim Decision 02-01-039 of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) on January 9, 2002 to infuse the necessary equity, working and other capital required for SDG&E expansion.

It is CPUC's conclusions of law under D.02-01-039, where one of the respondents was and is SDG&E and its holding company was and is Sempra Energy, that:

“1. The Commission is the arbiter of the meaning of its own decisions.

“2. In the context of Respondents' holding company decisions, when a utility's financial health is impaired and its ability to discharge its obligation to serve is consequently threatened, the first priority condition requires its holding company to give the utility preference over all competing potential recipients of capital resources.

“3. The holding company authorization decisions' discussion of the first priority condition in broad terms of utility financial health supports a reading of the condition as requiring the holding company to infuse the utility with all types of capital necessary for the utility to fulfill its obligation to serve.

“4. The 'balanced capital structure' condition in each holding company decision requires the utility to maintain its own balanced capital structure pursuant to the ratio set by the Commission in the respective general rate cases.

“5. According to SDG&E's interpretation – i.e., that the first priority condition only requires the utility to retain earnings to maintain a balanced capital structure and meet its obligation to serve, and does not require an affirmative holding company obligation to infuse funds into the utility – the first priority condition would impose the same requirement as the balanced capital structure condition and make the first priority condition superfluous. Because the decision cannot be read as making one of the conditions superfluous, the first priority condition must impose a different requirement, namely that the holding company must infuse capital into the utility when needed to meet its obligation to serve” (D.02-01-039 at pp.39-40).

Conclusion of Law No. 5 was modified by CPUC's D.02-07-043 of July 17, 2002 to read “The 'balanced capital structure' requirement is distinct from the first priority requirement – namely that the holding company must infuse capital into the utility when needed to meet its obligation to serve” (p. 40). According to CPUC, “Pursuant to the first priority condition, the holding companies are obligated to infuse capital into the utilities, particularly after having been the recipients of utility monies that could have been used to maintain the utilities' financial health during lean times” (p. 22). CPUC further states “The conditions under which the Commission approved the holding company structure impose a duty on the holding company to provide financial assistance to the utility should its ability to serve be jeopardized. When a utility's assets have been transferred to the holding company, as they have been for all three utilities, the utility is left with less capital with which to operate” (p. 23). Finally, “The holding companies... enjoy the benefits of a parent company as a result of the Commission's approval in the holding company decisions. If the holding company continues to exercise the authority conferred on it by the Commission, the Commission may require it to fulfill the first priority condition, even if the fulfillment causes a loss” (p. 29, emphasis added).

The status of CPUC Interim Decision 02-01-039 as modified by D.02-07-043 is that it has been reviewed and remanded to CPUC by California Court of Appeals in 2004, after the appeal was sought by the investor-owned utilities (118 Cal. App. 4th 1174). Subsequent to that remand, CPUC has closed the overarching 2000 California electricity crisis proceedings that provided the context for D.02-01-039 on ground that no investor-owned utilities or holding companies have submitted persuasive requests for rehearing (CPUC D.05-05-005 of May 5, 2005).

SDG&E holding company Sempra Energy reported total revenues of $8.1 billion for the 2009 calendar year, nearly $11 billion during year that included the Crash of 2008. Since 2000, Sempra Energy's ratio of quarterly dividend paid to shareholders relative to quarterly retained earnings is consistently between 35% to 39% of retained earnings while failing to infuse capital into SDG&E to prevent wildfires.

Without the Forest Supervisor imposing conditions necessary to preserve scenic integrity, the Forest Supervisor may be liable to Congress and the people of the United States for explaining the rationale in allowing the otherwise illegal disturbance of Cleveland National Forest scenic integrity. The Forest Supervisor should take great care to avoid any situation comparable to that of the Minerals Management Service with respect to BP as to the Deepwater Horizon incident, a situation that has resulted in the greatest ongoing ecological disaster in the history of the United States of America.


California CPUC citations available online:

D.02-01-039

D.02-07-043

D.05-05-005


If the above links do not work on your browser directly, then go to the CPUC website at http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/published/proceedings/I0104002.htm and see DECISIONS.

Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all

Previous article

Tiny Home Central isn’t solving the San Diego housing crisis

But it does hope to help fill in the gaps

The following was sent to the Forest Supervisor, so that he may allow SDG&E to put the Sunrise Powerlink project through the Cleveland National Forest... as long as it is entirely tunneled under the forest.


William Metz, Forest Supervisor
10845 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 200
San Diego, California 92127

ATTN: Sunrise Powerlink Comments

The Forest Supervisor may permit the intrusion of San Diego Gas & Electric Company's proposed Sunrise Powerlink project, but under the United States Code and the Code of Federal Regulations as to Forest Service, the Forest Supervisor may require the proposed project be conditioned by tunneling construction entirely underground to preserve the scenic integrity of the Cleveland National Forest, especially with respect to those areas that are currently undisturbed by any human presence but which may be subject to possible future utility disturbance above ground.

A Forest Supervisor decision to make a permit contingent on the utility's tunneling and other efforts to avoid disturbing Cleveland National Forest scenic integrity (36 CFR §261.1a as to “Forest Officer may place such conditions on the authorization as that officer considers necessary for the protection or administration of the National Forest System...”) is well supported by federal law and regulations as authorized by Congress and the President. Laws and regulations forbid the destruction by fire and depredation (16 USC §551), the disturbance of timber (36 CFR §261.6) or natural features and plants (36 CFR §261.9), the use of motorized vehicles that damages or disturbs that land or vegetation (36 CFR §261.15), and the entry with motorized equipment into primitive areas not previously disturbed by human presence (36 CFR §261.21). The Forest Supervisor shall aid other agencies in the performance of duties as imposed on those agencies by law (16 USC §553). The Forest Supervisor, for the Secretary of Agriculture, is obligated to determine and demonstrate the best methods for conserving forest lands in cooperation specifically with the State of California (16 USC §562).

The added cost of tunneling and otherwise avoiding any scenic integrity disturbance of the Cleveland National Forest shall be borne by SDG&E's corporate holding company Sempra Energy, pursuant to a previous Interim Decision 02-01-039 of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) on January 9, 2002 to infuse the necessary equity, working and other capital required for SDG&E expansion.

It is CPUC's conclusions of law under D.02-01-039, where one of the respondents was and is SDG&E and its holding company was and is Sempra Energy, that:

“1. The Commission is the arbiter of the meaning of its own decisions.

“2. In the context of Respondents' holding company decisions, when a utility's financial health is impaired and its ability to discharge its obligation to serve is consequently threatened, the first priority condition requires its holding company to give the utility preference over all competing potential recipients of capital resources.

“3. The holding company authorization decisions' discussion of the first priority condition in broad terms of utility financial health supports a reading of the condition as requiring the holding company to infuse the utility with all types of capital necessary for the utility to fulfill its obligation to serve.

“4. The 'balanced capital structure' condition in each holding company decision requires the utility to maintain its own balanced capital structure pursuant to the ratio set by the Commission in the respective general rate cases.

“5. According to SDG&E's interpretation – i.e., that the first priority condition only requires the utility to retain earnings to maintain a balanced capital structure and meet its obligation to serve, and does not require an affirmative holding company obligation to infuse funds into the utility – the first priority condition would impose the same requirement as the balanced capital structure condition and make the first priority condition superfluous. Because the decision cannot be read as making one of the conditions superfluous, the first priority condition must impose a different requirement, namely that the holding company must infuse capital into the utility when needed to meet its obligation to serve” (D.02-01-039 at pp.39-40).

Conclusion of Law No. 5 was modified by CPUC's D.02-07-043 of July 17, 2002 to read “The 'balanced capital structure' requirement is distinct from the first priority requirement – namely that the holding company must infuse capital into the utility when needed to meet its obligation to serve” (p. 40). According to CPUC, “Pursuant to the first priority condition, the holding companies are obligated to infuse capital into the utilities, particularly after having been the recipients of utility monies that could have been used to maintain the utilities' financial health during lean times” (p. 22). CPUC further states “The conditions under which the Commission approved the holding company structure impose a duty on the holding company to provide financial assistance to the utility should its ability to serve be jeopardized. When a utility's assets have been transferred to the holding company, as they have been for all three utilities, the utility is left with less capital with which to operate” (p. 23). Finally, “The holding companies... enjoy the benefits of a parent company as a result of the Commission's approval in the holding company decisions. If the holding company continues to exercise the authority conferred on it by the Commission, the Commission may require it to fulfill the first priority condition, even if the fulfillment causes a loss” (p. 29, emphasis added).

The status of CPUC Interim Decision 02-01-039 as modified by D.02-07-043 is that it has been reviewed and remanded to CPUC by California Court of Appeals in 2004, after the appeal was sought by the investor-owned utilities (118 Cal. App. 4th 1174). Subsequent to that remand, CPUC has closed the overarching 2000 California electricity crisis proceedings that provided the context for D.02-01-039 on ground that no investor-owned utilities or holding companies have submitted persuasive requests for rehearing (CPUC D.05-05-005 of May 5, 2005).

SDG&E holding company Sempra Energy reported total revenues of $8.1 billion for the 2009 calendar year, nearly $11 billion during year that included the Crash of 2008. Since 2000, Sempra Energy's ratio of quarterly dividend paid to shareholders relative to quarterly retained earnings is consistently between 35% to 39% of retained earnings while failing to infuse capital into SDG&E to prevent wildfires.

Without the Forest Supervisor imposing conditions necessary to preserve scenic integrity, the Forest Supervisor may be liable to Congress and the people of the United States for explaining the rationale in allowing the otherwise illegal disturbance of Cleveland National Forest scenic integrity. The Forest Supervisor should take great care to avoid any situation comparable to that of the Minerals Management Service with respect to BP as to the Deepwater Horizon incident, a situation that has resulted in the greatest ongoing ecological disaster in the history of the United States of America.


California CPUC citations available online:

D.02-01-039

D.02-07-043

D.05-05-005


If the above links do not work on your browser directly, then go to the CPUC website at http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/published/proceedings/I0104002.htm and see DECISIONS.

Sponsored
Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed Big Screen — Movie commentary Blurt — Music's inside track Booze News — San Diego spirits Classical Music — Immortal beauty Classifieds — Free and easy Cover Stories — Front-page features Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts Feast! — Food & drink reviews Feature Stories — Local news & stories Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore From the Archives — Spotlight on the past Golden Dreams — Talk of the town The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it Letters — Our inbox Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news News Ticker — News & politics Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated Poetry — The old and the new Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers Reading — The hunt for intellectuals Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds SD on the QT — Almost factual news Sheep and Goats — Places of worship Special Issues — The best of Street Style — San Diego streets have style Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves Theater — On stage in San Diego this week Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads Your Week — Daily event picks
4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs
Close

Anchor ads are not supported on this page.