Friday movie meltdown: What Maisie Knew
Matthew Lickona 11:44 a.m., May 24
Matthew Lickona 11:13 a.m., May 24
Ken Harrison 10:47 a.m., May 24
© 2013 San Diego Reader. All rights reserved. No part of this site may be reproduced without our written permission.
Schooled!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyJVgISDZ94&play... more information about Obama's illegitimacy as well as his links to communism and the various levels of fraud hes involved with— June 1, 2011 1:05 p.m.
Schooled!
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageI... Trump stated he believes the BC is fake and that his own computer expert said the same when it was released— May 26, 2011 1:24 p.m.
Schooled!
charges are being filed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKxfnU2HVkw— May 24, 2011 4:01 p.m.
Schooled!
another good video exposing some of the various problems with the BC http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgIMsSEAkYc— May 19, 2011 5:45 a.m.
Schooled!
looks like its practically official at this point... ITS FAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58vFN2FFu2U— May 16, 2011 6:31 p.m.
Schooled!
are you stupid dude? I have been making the case that its fake and actually providing the evidence for that through the course of these comments what evidence have you provided? none learn how to comprehend so as to not embarrass yourself in the future— May 14, 2011 6:17 p.m.
Schooled!
here is another good video to explain it and walk you through the process visually just keep in mind that an optimization creates layers as well as OCR(and there is no OCR in the BC) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1B1RyhD32Y http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gscd6ENFDRY those are the 2 videos I would personally use in any debates with debunkers focus on the differences in the layers and demand counter evidence lets see if they can produce :)— May 14, 2011 5:18 p.m.
Schooled!
I don't consider myself a "birther" but a truth seeker and I jump from topic to topic where I see fit that outta the way any birthers trying to make the point that this is fake need to stop stating that the fact that it has layers is proof its fake cause its not and IMO it would be better to leave the graphical anomalies alone for the most part and leave that to the experts if I were you, I would focus on the NUMBER of layers and what visual information is contained in each of those layers from what I have seen thus far, the layers a computer creates from an optimization are COMPLETELY different from the type of layers in the BC. For one thing, there are MANY more layers created from an optimization and those layers contain very different data from the layers in the BC so whenever you find yourself in debate try to get the "debunker" to produce REAL evidence(not just fancy technical jargon) that a computer is capable of producing an identical AMOUNT of layers with very similar visual information in each of those layers that is the key IMO at this point in time so called debunkers have ignored the fact that the layers are completely different, instead trying to use the fact that the computer can create layers at all in an optimization as proof and its not...this indicates a deceptive tendency within the debunkers methods, who apparently cares more about appearing right than actually being right— May 14, 2011 5:05 p.m.
Schooled!
A real person who works at High Tech High is quoted in the article so if its not true(no evidence of that thus far) then she might be able to sue. There is at least one other article in this section that IS real(did the research to confirm) So are simply making assumptions about the articles validity and we won't know until we get a statement from High Tech High, or this story is retracted— May 14, 2011 12:23 p.m.
Schooled!
It seems quite simple to me. All you debunkers have to do is produce a video of a recreation So that means you will have to locate the software or the hardware or both that is capable of recreating the type of layers seen in the BC and make a quick simple video easily debunking us by showing us the same type of layers with the same differences produced by an optimization(or whatever it may be called in that particular software) simple, easy... if you cannot reproduce the effects seen in the BC then there is no explanation and no excuse that will mean or prove anything... show us with our own eyes that a computer created those layers If you cannot do this then I will consider your explanation refuted(and so will many others) so the onus of proof is now on you..GET BUSY!— May 14, 2011 8:15 a.m.