Is Proposition X a black hole?

It is hard to imagine the AGC ever encountering a school bond issue that it didn't like. Remember that most such borrowing propositions use the money for construction, and the AGC is all about building things. So, it is to the advantage of the industry to see many such bond issues approved. (There is one fly in the ointment today. "Technology" can consume some of the money borrowed. That means buying computers, and the darned things are obsolete about as soon as they are bought. After a few years, they need replacing, and the cycle starts again.) The bond issues today are far too easy to pass. Before the law change, they were hard to get approved. Despite that, some years ago, the San Ysidro district did get its voters to approve a multi-year, half-billion dollar plan, even though the district had no immediate plans to borrow and spend that much. One can only assume that the voters of that small and poor district figured that "the man" (their landlords) would pay the resultant taxes. Or they thought they would not be around to have to worry about it. District after district is putting such financing measures on the ballot. What ever happened to the notion that the state is paying for public education? The affluent districts and an occasional poor one can tax themselves to excess to pay for new schools, gyms, stadia, etc. and provide something that the poorer areas will never afford. Yet while the court decision that mandated equal funding for schools still stands, it appears to have no effect on these borrowing plans.
— October 5, 2016 8:15 p.m.

Win a $25 Gift Card to
The Broken Yolk Cafe

Join our newsletter list

Each newsletter subscription means another chance to win!