Gerry Limpic: “You can’t go into a job interview with your things on your back.”
  • Gerry Limpic: “You can’t go into a job interview with your things on your back.”
  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

Last December in federal court, Dan Bamberg was trying to figure out how homeless men and women could store their belongings safely and out of sight rather than carry them around everywhere. Transport containers of the type used on ships and railroad cars came to mind. Bamberg, chief deputy attorney for the City of San Diego, was negotiating with the Isaiah Project, a small local nonprofit, and the American Civil Liberties Union. On December 2, 2009, the two organizations had filed a class-action lawsuit against the City, arguing that several months earlier, its Environmental Services Department unconstitutionally removed from the street the property of 30 to 35 homeless people and crushed it in the backs of garbage trucks. The possessions lost included medications and family pictures in addition to clothing, blankets, and other goods. According to the plaintiffs, City notices giving advance warning of abandoned property abatement had been torn down, preventing the owners from knowing that their property was in danger of being taken.

Eventually, the opponents decided to settle out of court, although initial proposals to give victims hamburgers or gift certificates to a local clothing store were quickly rejected. But one step was easy, Bamberg tells me. “Previously,” he says, “the City would post a sign that said, ‘Hey, get your stuff out of here, and if you don’t, when we come back, we will consider it to be abandoned and we’re going to take it away.…’ Now, not only will the notices be posted on the areas to be abated, but those same notices will be posted at the homeless service centers in [East Village], such as Father Joe’s, the Neil Good Day Center, and God’s Extended Hand. We also agreed that the police department’s Homeless Outreach Team would go by every day after the posting, right up to the day of abatement, to remind the people.”

But further negotiations were “about to fall apart,” says Bamberg, “because I couldn’t get the transport containers idea into flesh and blood.” That’s when police sergeant Rick Schnell, head of the Homeless Outreach Team, called Bamberg’s attention to a 20,000-square-foot building on skid row in Los Angeles that was storing the property of 600 people on the streets. It sounded promising, so Bamberg rounded up the negotiators and enlisted Schnell to drive them to L.A. in a police van to tour the operation. In all, the group totaled eight, including Gerry Limpic of the Isaiah Project and David “Water Man” Ross, known to many as San Diego’s most tireless homeless advocate.

One key to the success of the L.A. facility, called the Central City East Association Check-in Center, is the use of 96-gallon trash barrels by each person wanting to store possessions. The L.A. center operates with a strict set of rules to keep the operation orderly and charges no money for the storage.

Dan Bamberg, chief deputy attorney for the City of San Diego, filed a class-action suit against the City for trashing the property of 30–35 homeless people.

Dan Bamberg, chief deputy attorney for the City of San Diego, filed a class-action suit against the City for trashing the property of 30–35 homeless people.

The tour impressed enough that the deal for how to compensate those who lost their belongings in 2009 would now include a similar check-in center in San Diego. “I made it my mission,” says Bamberg, “to find some brick and mortar to do it.” He tells me he went to the Centre City Development Corporation and was promised a 4000-square-foot building, filled only with junk, at 917 Ninth Avenue across from the downtown library. The Isaiah Project would get a year’s use of the building for one dollar. After that, low-income housing is scheduled to replace the structure and a parking lot at the corner of Ninth and Broadway.

“I also got the Environmental Services Department to agree to give us the bins that the stuff would be kept in,” Bamberg added. To pay for the rest of the plan, the San Diego City Council on January 11 approved $150,000, an amount that was increased to $160,000 by a donation from the Downtown San Diego Partnership, a codefendant in the original lawsuit with less liability than the City. The final amount, after approval by the federal court, would be divided into three: $20,000 to compensate the original property losers, $40,000 for the plaintiffs’ attorneys, and $100,000 to pay for a small staff, insurance, utilities, and other expenses at the new Ninth Avenue facility. The Isaiah Project’s Gerry Limpic was named as the storage center’s executive director, and while final court approval would have to wait a little longer, the City began releasing money for the organization to get to work as soon as it could.

Limpic, Ross, and a number of homeless volunteers then went to work cleaning out the building. They were joined by residents of the Lighthouse, a program at 14th and Market for early-release ex-offenders. During the cleanup, the City delivered 500 trash bins, twice as many as could fit inside the building. The Lighthouse contingent assembled 250 of the bins, arranging them in long rows with aisles in between wide enough to move the containers in and out. The remaining bins have been stored in the back for the time when a larger building can be found.

On February 2, the facility, christened the Water Man Check-In Center, opened for business. Six days later, it was filled to capacity. To handle the shortfall, Limpic tells me, he went out and bought a slew of 33-gallon totes, stacking them along the walls and increasing the check-in center’s capacity to 328 containers. “True, they’re not as big as the other bins,” he says, “but for somebody who has only a bag and backpack, they work fine.

“Except for a couple of things like that,” Limpic continues, “we are modeled totally on the Los Angeles check-in center. We use their computer system, follow their rules, and assign all customers numbered bins. They can come in and ask us to bring their bins out into a common area that we try to keep up as much like a living room as possible. A local artist named Walter Redondo came in and painted a few small murals on the walls.

Water Man Check-In Center clients retrieving and storing their belongings

Water Man Check-In Center clients retrieving and storing their belongings

“The most important rule is that the people sign in once a week so we know they haven’t just dumped their things and taken off. We give them a grace period if they don’t come in some week, but after a while, we pack them out, though we keep their things in the back for 60 days. There are 50 to 100 people every day trying to get in here.”

  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

More from SDReader

More from the web

Comments

Bob_Hudson Aug. 10, 2011 @ 6:20 p.m.

So, let's break this down:

$100,000 to administer a (rent-free) building full of large trash cans for less than a year;

$40,000 for the lawyers;

$20,000 minus expenses to be divided amongst some apparently unknown victims who have now have to file claims...

Well, at least the lawyers did well.

0

Twister Aug. 10, 2011 @ 7:49 p.m.

Ours is a most profane culture. The "haves," at almost any level, are indifferent to the "have-nots," and what little is left of a social conscience is largely isolated to write-offs (pun intended) and rusty cans from the self-righteous. The stingiest among us depend upon the true charity of the downtrodden to help each other.

0

learnb4ugive Aug. 11, 2011 @ 8:44 a.m.

This is one of the most effective, efficient projects I have seen. You have to go there to truly understand how well it works. It helps people keep there belongings safe and clean while cleaning up the downtown community all for a relatively small amount of funding. Their funding is leveraged by using volunteers to work with the small staff. The office they mention was already there and to my knowledge was furnished with second hand stuff. These folks waste NO money. As a resident of East Village I commend them for their efforts in helping our community. It would truly be a shame if this small amount of funding was not continued to allow this project to continue helping people help themselves.

0

Fred Williams Aug. 11, 2011 @ 10:33 p.m.

This project makes a lot of sense, and David Ross continues to be one of the most heroic men in San Diego.

David Ross gets beat up, by cops, by thugs, by the very people he tries so hard to help, yet he keeps working on his mission to make a real difference in the world for those who suffer on the streets.

This simple idea, of giving the unfortunate a secure place to store some of their belongings, is long overdue. While it may seem expensive, compared to just about everything else the city is doing it's a bargain...plus, it actually works. When we see CCDC wasting hundreds of thousands on "reports" which contain falsified information to support pre-ordained conclusions, written by former CCDC insiders now working as consultants, we know that most of the money this organization spends is squandered.

Remember also that former councilman Maienschein is being paid a handsome salary by the United Way to implement the "Plan to End Chronic Homelessness". Oh really? What's he doing?

And former CCDC board member, and wife of Toni Atkins, Jennifer LeSar was just given a huge sum of public money to also "solve homelessness". How's that working out, Jen?

So while the costs of this simple and straightforward project, a hundred grand a year, seem high, it's a lot more value for tax payer's money than the quiet corruption of paying off insiders to claim credit for "helping the homeless" while preparing their next career step.

Meanwhile, David Ross gets punched in the face, lawyers get their cut, the homeless have to wait and wait for their compensation, or any assistance from a contemptuous public.

San Diego, America's Finest City.

0

Twister Aug. 12, 2011 @ 9:19 a.m.

Thanks to Fred and a handful of other real human beings, the rest of us are better advised about just how we are being rolled. Ordinary muggers get the slammer; we get what we are suckers enough to tolerate.

0

Sign in to comment

Join our
newsletter list

Enter to win $25 at Broken Yolk Cafe

Each newsletter subscription
means another chance to win!

Close