• Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

"The Uptown Partnership voted to take the suicide pill," reported one Hillcrest denizen in an email after returning from the parking agency's November 4 meeting.

According to several area residents who attended the meeting, Uptown Partnership, the agency responsible for the parking supply in Hillcrest, Mission Hills, and Banker’s Hill, passed two resolutions, both of which appear to signal the end of Uptown Partnership after ten years of administering the parking district.

The first resolution passed during the monthly board meeting allows the City Planning and Community Investment Department, not Uptown Partnership, to find a facilitator to restructure and reform the parking district and manage its annual $750,000 contract.

"There is such a lack of confidence from the neighborhoods," said one resident of Uptown who was present at the meeting and helped draft the motion. "The thinking behind the resolution was if Uptown Partnership was involved, then the perception from community members is that the process would be tainted."

The second resolution, introduced by board member Jim Frost, notified the city that once Uptown Partnership's contract expires on December 28, the nonprofit corporation would not pursue any additional city contracts.

Both resolutions come after staff, board members, and councilmembers Todd Gloria and Kevin Faulconer attended an October 16 public workshop, conducted by management consultants Albert Hall and Associates, aimed at restructuring the parking agency.

Tim Gahagan, a Hillcrest resident and longtime advocate for reform of Uptown Partnership, was present at Thursday's meeting. Gahagan is not convinced that the end of Uptown Partnership is near.

"No one saw it coming," said Gahagan during a November 5 phone interview. "Maybe the motion was meant to show that Uptown Partnership is just done, no more contracts. But, I don't really know.... It seemed as if [Uptown Partnership] was telling the city to go pound sand."

Carol Shultz, Uptown Partnership's Executive Director, failed to respond to a request for comment.

Photo courtesy of www.hillquest.com

  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

More from SDReader

Comments

a2zresource Nov. 6, 2010 @ 7:35 p.m.

If the end of the current contract ends a $750,000 annual expense with very little to show for it in the public interest, and it is a sincere offer not to seek additional contracts, then LET'$ $AVE $OME!

0

nostalgic Nov. 8, 2010 @ 4:02 p.m.

Maybe it will become all new, like Parking District of Uptown, and if the board members have the same name, oh well.

0

HonestGovernment Nov. 8, 2010 @ 7:18 p.m.

The entire Parking District concept is a huge sham and scam. Contracts with the numerous groups in the business community, emanating from CPCI's Economic Development division, have been a colossal joke for years. Donald Shoup, indeed. Anything that will disable this give-away of money that should go into the General Fund will be a great move forward. And anything that will disable and upend the most corrupt, useless, wasteful San Diego department, CPCI, headed by Bill Anderson and Beth Murray, will be the beginning of the end of everything that is wrong with San Diego.

0

a2zresource Nov. 9, 2010 @ 6:20 a.m.

RE #3:

Don Bauder has spent considerable time and effort following the KESSLER V. CITY OF SAN DIEGO whistle-blower case involving business improvement district problems with conflicts of interest, investigated by HUD, FBI and SDPD but not prosecuted by our incumbent district attorney. See Bauder's SCAM DIEGO blog posts and at least one CITY LIGHTS article by him on that matter.

0

Sign in to comment

Join our
newsletter list

Enter to win $25 at Broken Yolk Cafe

Each newsletter subscription
means another chance to win!

Close