• Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

— In an alleyway in Ocean Beach, near the intersection of Newport and Bacon, Keith Morgan sits in a white plastic chair padded with two pieces of cardboard. He’s slept in that chair since May, when he returned to San Diego from Maryland to try to rekindle his relationship with his kids. The alleys are his home now, where he spends his time when he’s not out trying to find odd jobs or sell the jewelry he makes from beads. He’d rather stay on the beach — he has a tent — but his homeless friends have warned him against that, especially if he wants a drink. “It’s not worth it, man, it ain’t even worth the trouble,” he says. “No, this is my spot. I got some shade and a cool breeze. It’s not worth going to the beach and getting an open-container ticket.”

Since last January, when the City of San Diego banned drinking at the beach, complaints have risen in beach communities about an increased number of homeless people loitering in alleys in residential areas and hanging around in business districts. Some believe the ban has moved homeless people from the sand to farther inland.

Prior to the ban, from noon to eight at night, the beaches served as safe havens for the homeless, a place where they could go to drink and stay out of trouble. Since the ban, much has changed.

O.B. Boston James sought refuge at the beach for eight years, and you can tell by his tanned face and the dried-out, scabby skin on his arms. He went to the beach to hang out with friends and have some beers. But since the ban, he’s found refuge in alleys. “I’m going to drink no matter what. I just have to be a lot more discreet now, that’s all. It’s like a child’s game now, like hide-and-seek,” he says as he slips behind a Dumpster and takes a swig from a large can of beer. There are laws against drinking in alleyways too, but according to James, the alleys provide a cover that the beach does not. “Now we’re always ducking and dodging the police,” he says. “I know they’re only doing their job. I didn’t tell them what profession they should go into, but if they want to spend three times as much gas and energy trying to catch me drinking, let them do it.”

Midday in Pacific Beach, near the corner of Garnet and Cass, in the center of the business district, a group of homeless individuals drink from Slurpee cups and sip on bottles of Gatorade. “Robby,” a long-haired, bearded man in his late 20s, is among the group. When asked what has changed since the alcohol ban went into effect, he responds, “We stay away from the beach, but besides that, not much. Everyone still drinks, but we just pour it into cups. The cops can’t search every cup on the streets. It would be total harassment. What, are they going to stop everyone from drinking out of cups? Are they going to smell everyone’s drink?”

Another Pacific Beach homeless man, “Gabriel,” says he sees people drinking on the beach all the time, but instead of drinking right out of the can or bottle, they’re drinking out of red plastic cups. He feels the ban targets the homeless. Otherwise, he says, the cops would be handing out tickets to the younger crowd carrying the red cups. Instead, they’re chasing the homeless around town.

Benjamin Nicholls is the executive director of Pacific Beach’s business improvement district, Discover Pacific Beach. Since the ban, Nicholls has heard more complaints from business owners about homeless people. “One of the issues with the ban is that before, homeless folks could sit on the beach and drink and not bother anyone, plus there are public restrooms they could use. What they’ve done now is they have moved into the alleys. If you drive around PB’s alleys, you’ll see homeless people camped out. It’s a little ‘out of sight, out of mind’ — people don’t see the homeless folks on the beach, and they sort of congratulate themselves about the success of the ban.”

Nicholls expected the ban to push homeless people into the business district. “We knew it was coming because it just makes sense,” he says. “These people have a problem, and banning them from drinking at the beach doesn’t solve those issues. They’re going to find a place to drink. It’s a little bit disappointing this city can’t find a way to help these people. I don’t think the number of homeless in Pacific Beach has increased, but there are definitely more around the business district since the ban started.”

Farther south, in Ocean Beach, Denny Knox, director of the Ocean Beach Mainstreet Association, hasn’t seen much change. She says OB’s business district has always had a large number of homeless people. According to Knox, her office was getting more calls about drunk and disorderly people at the beach before the ban took effect than it’s getting now about homeless people loitering in alleys and around businesses. Residents have complained about more homeless congregating near Sunset Cliffs and about a few pockets of problem beaches, she says, but for the most part, the police have addressed those issues.

Officer David Surwilo, community liaison for the police department’s western division, says his division has seen a spike in complaints about homeless people loitering in the alleys and in business districts. “We knew that there were going to be some negative side effects that we were going to have to work through,” he says. “We knew many of these homeless people would be displaced, and they were likely to move off of the sand and into the alleys and behind the liquor stores. So we expected that, and we had a plan that addressed it. On May 10, we stood up our beach team, so now they are on the beach and in the alleys. It’s a misconception that the beach team only covers the beach. They cover the entire beach community — the alleys, the bars, the house parties, everywhere during the summer months — and so far it has been effective.”

  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

More from SDReader

Comments

LAL Aug. 13, 2008 @ 3:18 p.m.

The City Council never had a plan to monitor the "trial alcohol ban" and now 6 months into the 1 year ban they declare it is working. This is going to be interesting how they are going to prove to San Diego that the City is better off since the ban was enacted. I hope they realize we are not stupid and we expect to see metrics, factual evidence, hard undisputable statistics and not just options' of small vocal minority. The City Council should have taken the Mayors compromise seriously. A Holiday ban may have been a good deal for everyone. The problem is that Councilman Faulconer is playing politics and we know what happens to political figures in San Diego who try to pull one over on everyone especially when it comes to banning alcohol. It will be interesting to see if he has a political career after this little mess it has gotten himself into.

0

velo333 Aug. 21, 2008 @ 1:50 p.m.

The City Council definitely think we are stupid. Their political strategy counts on it. I am optimistic that the majority of registered voters in San Diego will defeat the vocal minority of New Puritans and their Cromwellian leader, Kevin Faulconer this November. Get these kooks off our beaches before we are required to wear black from head to toe because the New Puritan families who want to take over object to seeing girls in bikinis on the beach. The beach belongs to everyone, not just those wealthy enough to own property there.

0

dr_zero Feb. 27, 2009 @ 8:48 p.m.

true. the beach is for everyone. not just vermin.

let me have my pabst in the sand.

0

Sign in to comment

Join our
newsletter list

Enter to win $25 at Broken Yolk Cafe

Each newsletter subscription
means another chance to win!

Close