Ian Anderson 5 p.m., May 21
A Better San Diego Talks Tax Proposals
The third installment of community/labor group A Better San Diego’s monthly breakfast forums was held this morning, with the focus of the event a discussion on the different tax proposals currently gathering signatures for the upcoming November ballot.
The meeting was more sparsely attended than others, drawing a crowd of 50-60 community members. Lower attendance was attributed to some confusion regarding a recent announcement that Governor Jerry Brown would team up with the California Federation of Teachers, combining rival proposals for a sales tax hike and a so-called “Millionaire’s Tax.”
Kim Pattillo Brownson, Director of Education Equity for the Advancement Project, spoke in favor of another plan backed by Pasadena activist and civil-rights attorney Molly Munger.
Under the “Our Children, Our Future” plan, personal income taxes would rise for Californians across the board, with the lion’s share of increases being levied on the state’s wealthier residents.
It’s expected to raise up to $10 billion in its first year, with 30% of the funding going into the general fund to pay school debts for the first four years. Remaining money would be earmarked for education.
Pattillo Brownson justified the need for increased education funding by saying that the state ranks 47th nationally in per-pupil spending, with the largest class sizes and largest ratio of students to staff members such as counselors, librarians, and nurses.
“We have seen a massive disinvestment in public schools,” said Pattillo Brownson. “It is unacceptable to have elementary students in, basically, warehouse conditions.”
She continued to say that there would be no state mandate on how funds were to be spent – they would be sent to school districts based on student population, with spending decisions made locally by school boards.
David Kieffer, the Executive Director of SEIU California, was originally scheduled to speak on Governor Brown’s proposal, but instead presented the hybrid plan proposed to replace it two days ago.
Josh Pechthalt, President of the California Federation of Teachers, was invited to talk on the Millionaire's Tax Proposal but chose not to attend given the likelihood that his initiative would be rolled into the Brown plan.
Kieffer began his presentation by attacking the idea of earmarking new revenue to address only one issue affecting the state budget crisis, saying that the state legislature was already handicapped by past measures that “run our state by ballot box.”
“Sacramento is broken because we keep breaking it,” Kieffer said.
Under the hybrid tax plan, Brown’s proposed sales tax increase would be reduced from one-half cent to a quarter cent, expected to raise $1 billion in annual revenue.
Another $8 billion would be raised by increasing the personal income tax on individuals making over $250,000 or couples making $500,000 or more by one percent, increasing taxes by two percent on those making $300,000 or $600,000, and three percent on incomes over $500,000 individually or $1 million as a couple.
“Eight billion dollars is raised by taxing the one percent. If we get a deal like that in life, we should take it,” said Kieffer, acknowledging that while a sales tax, which regressively impacts the poor more than the rich, is not ideal, the bulk of funds would be in the form of a progressive tax. “It’s probably the most progressive tax that we’ve seen in the state of California, bar none,” he added.
During a question-and-answer session following the presentations, the issue came up that many have suggested that multiple pushes for increased taxes might cause overwhelmed voters to reject all of them. This argument has been used in an attempt to push Munger’s group to withdraw their proposal.
“It is not by any stretch of the imagination a foregone conclusion that everything loses,” Pattillo Brownson responded to the suggestion. “It’s an opportunity to have a real and robust conversation about what California’s values are,” she continued.
Pattillo Brownson further suggested that since approval levels for the state legislature have chronically languished well below 50 percent that “Our Children, Our Future,” which places spending responsibility in the hands of local officials rather than adding to the state’s general fund, might be more palatable to voters.
State Senator Christine Kehoe also spoke in favor of the hybrid proposal and against the Munger plan. “The child just doesn’t go to school. The child has to have, if they come from a poor family, Healthy Families coverage, [parents] might need job training, CalWorks may kick in. You can’t just fund education, you have to fund services for the whole child and whole family,” she said, noting that health and human services budgets have been under the axe to a degree even greater than education during recent budget cuts.
“Let’s not piss away this opportunity. We could really change things for five to seven years,” concluded Kehoe.
Labor leader and event emcee Lorena Gonzalez announced that A Better San Diego would plan another forum in the coming weeks as more details became available concerning the new combined plan from Brown and the California Federation of Teachers.
Pictured: David Kieffer
More like this:
- Biggest Prop 30 tax burden would fall on wealthiest 1% — Sept. 12, 2012
- Voter Survey: Smokers' Tax Losing Support, Brown Tax Proposal Remains Strong — May 23, 2012
- Gov. Brown Calls for Deep Spending Cuts, Tax Hikes — May 14, 2012
- Californians Want School Funding Without Sales Tax Hike — April 26, 2012
- Survey Says Californians Support Tax Hikes, Oppose Education Cuts — Jan. 24, 2012