Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Print Edition
Classifieds
Stories
Events
Contests
Music
Movies
Theater
Food
Life Events
Cannabis
May 15, 2024
May 8, 2024
May 1, 2024
April 24, 2024
April 17, 2024
April 10, 2024
April 2, 2024
March 27, 2024
March 20, 2024
March 13, 2024
March 6, 2024
February 28, 2024
Close
May 15, 2024
May 8, 2024
May 1, 2024
April 24, 2024
April 17, 2024
April 10, 2024
April 2, 2024
March 27, 2024
March 20, 2024
March 13, 2024
March 6, 2024
February 28, 2024
May 15, 2024
May 8, 2024
May 1, 2024
April 24, 2024
April 17, 2024
April 10, 2024
April 2, 2024
March 27, 2024
March 20, 2024
March 13, 2024
March 6, 2024
February 28, 2024
Close
Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Up to 30 deputy city attorneys terminated
So basically he's not pulling his weight around the office. It appears to me he's dead wood, so it's a benefit to me, the taxpaying local resident, to get him out of there and find a more productive employee. His whining about white identity politics is typical of bitter people who would rather blame anyone but themselves for their shortcomings, and disgusting to boot considering the painful effects Bitter White Man Syndrome has had on our national discourse. It's too bad a sympathetic reporter swallowed it and gave him a platform, without confirming whether there was any sign of discrimination. To wit: "He BELIEVES that most, if not all, were older white males." That's one heck of an accusation and irresponsible to reproduce without checking on the other 29 attorneys. Any females on the list? Racial or ethnic minorities? How many were hired back, for what salary/benefit adjustments, and who were they? We don't know, because the reporter apparently didn't check. No evidence offered, just one bitter man's "belief." I would like to know more about this story, if only to see how Elliott's administration is differing from Goldsmith's. I hope the Reader puts a real reporter on it.— September 6, 2017 8:40 a.m.
Prevost ducks trial by Bar court
It's too bad we can't dis-bar lazy journalists.— August 31, 2017 5:59 p.m.
Prevost ducks trial by Bar court
Still no answer, Don? You seem to answer everything else. I think this has something to do with the women who rejected you while you were at the U-T. It can't all be about working for the ISS.— August 31, 2017 5:58 p.m.
Prevost ducks trial by Bar court
Aguirre is an attention whore. Now it's biting him in the ass.— August 28, 2017 7:52 a.m.
Prevost ducks trial by Bar court
My friend was one of those women. You have decided that either she's lying or she wasn't sexually assaulted. You seem to think it's OK for a guy like Filner to grope her -- groping is sexual assault, by the way. You also seem to think, without a shred of evidence, that it's OK to call her a liar because it suits your political leanings. Furthermore, Filner himself admitted he's a pervert and has a problem, but you refuse to hear it. Men may not touch women without their consent -- do you understand that? You wake up, you pathetic conspiracy theorist. Maybe if you showed your face in San Diego, you wouldn't insult victims of sexual assault. Now, once more, are you calling my friend a liar? Why are you doing hit jobs on victims of sexual assault? Why is it so important for you to try to blame the victims? Wasn't at least one a former colleague of yours at the UT? Are you calling her a liar, too? Are they all liars? Don't you understand -- Filner himself admitted it. What the hell is wrong with you? Have you attempted to interview any of them? Or was that another case of "research that may be futile." You "wake up." You're an insult to journalism, you're lazy, and you're an indecent human being.— August 28, 2017 7:43 a.m.
Chicago bosses clean out top editors at LA Times
McSwain has a column in today's paper. Please retract your statement and offer a correction, and while at it, name your incorrect source.— August 28, 2017 7:34 a.m.
Prevost ducks trial by Bar court
"Research that may be futile." Right. In other words, you're lazy. Do you really think that each of the 13 women who accused Filner of harassing them just made it all up? I guess, being the lazy Coloradan that you are, it's easier to say so and that Filner got "lynched" than bother with any of that "research that may be futile."— August 24, 2017 2:22 a.m.
Prevost ducks trial by Bar court
Maybe he was busy running for mayor and getting 5 percent instead of doing his job and representing his clients? The blowjobs you give Aguirre are embarrassing, Mr. Bauder. Wipe the jizz off your chin.— August 23, 2017 7:43 a.m.
Prevost ducks trial by Bar court
If she was charged in 1986, wouldn't it be at all possible to also include how the legal process played out? Was she acquitted? Were the charges dropped? Was she found not guilty by reason of insanity? What was the victim's name? Where did this happen? Has she been practicing in San Diego or another local town? Are you leaving these details out for OUR sake? Speaking of shady attorneys, http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/watchdog…— August 16, 2017 10:22 p.m.
Today the saddest day ever for Chargers fans
Bauder, you write that the local and national media are fawning over Spanos and blaming San Diego. Um, no. Not even close. The U-T's been ripping them a new one -- see their editorial, and a couple of Acee pieces -- and even KUSI's been pretty rough on the Chargers tonight during the special. Rightfully so, and it kind of makes me proud, but still -- the coverage has not been remotely like you describe. It's almost like you didn't even look... Had you bothered to cite an example when casting an aspersion, you might have done better. But, alas, you didn't cite an example. Not a one. So basically you made a BS statement. You're just like Spanos. And don't get me started on your comment about "lynched Filner..." The man was a sexual predator, Donald Trump with better politics. Even Filner admitted it. Don't you have a faked moon landing or autism-by-vaccine "story" to write? Has InfoWars responded to your resume? Aren't you "local media"? Oh wait...— January 12, 2017 10:58 p.m.